April 23, 200917 yr Hi guys, well, in a while I'll be finished with my goal of 99 Attack, and I'm doubting what to do with my melees after that. Currently I'm thinking about three options: - 99 Attack, 99 Strength and 75 Defence - 99 Attack, 70 Strength and 99 Defence - 99 Attack, 90 Strength and 80 Defence I would appreciate it if you could give me some opinions on the matter. Also do take in mind that I like the occasional monster hunt trip. Thanks a lot guys :thumbup: Dj Chuck Norris doesn't ever need a compass; he randomly points somewhere and north goes there in order not to anger him.
April 23, 200917 yr I like the last option, but try for 80 def first. What I'm doing after i got 99 att was get 90 def then 90 str, after that I plan on 95 def then 95 str 99 def 99 str. With training Str you are kinda stuck with either the Sara Sword or a D scim+Rune Defender. Whip+Def for training def. [hide=Drops]Slayer:Draconic Visage x3, Abyssal Whip x23, Dark Bow x3, Dragon Platelegs x3, Dragon Boots x40, Dragon Plateskirt x4, Shield Left Half x3, Dragon Medium Helms x10GWD:CS: Zamorakian Spear x2, Zamorak Hilt x1, Bandos Chestplate x1, Sara Sword x1DKs: Dragon Hatchet x3 Beserker Ring x1[/hide][hide=Completed Goals]Achieved April 26, 2009Achieved Sept. 15, 2009Achieved Nov. 21, 2009 Jan. 10, 2010 Achieved Mar. 5, 2010[/hide][hide=Goals][/hide]
April 23, 200917 yr Author All 99's. I'd rather go with one of the three options listed above. I just don't get the feel of 99 flat :-# Chuck Norris doesn't ever need a compass; he randomly points somewhere and north goes there in order not to anger him.
April 24, 200917 yr I'd get 99 attack and strength and 75 defence. I don't really pk much, but from what I've read, low defence is better. YouTube
April 24, 200917 yr THIS would be the easiest in my opinion. Get 99 str frist, then 99 attack, then 99 def. Reason 99 str and 99 attack ( high hits/acc) so training def would be faster and easier :)
April 24, 200917 yr THIS would be the easiest in my opinion. Get 99 str frist, then 99 attack, then 99 def. Reason 99 str and 99 attack ( high hits/acc) so training def would be faster and easier :) Hate to be mean but, can you not read? He is about to get 99 attack, wants to know what he should do next. And it seems like he has a decent idea about what levels he wants. Really, its up to you how and what you train. [hide=Drops]Slayer:Draconic Visage x3, Abyssal Whip x23, Dark Bow x3, Dragon Platelegs x3, Dragon Boots x40, Dragon Plateskirt x4, Shield Left Half x3, Dragon Medium Helms x10GWD:CS: Zamorakian Spear x2, Zamorak Hilt x1, Bandos Chestplate x1, Sara Sword x1DKs: Dragon Hatchet x3 Beserker Ring x1[/hide][hide=Completed Goals]Achieved April 26, 2009Achieved Sept. 15, 2009Achieved Nov. 21, 2009 Jan. 10, 2010 Achieved Mar. 5, 2010[/hide][hide=Goals][/hide]
April 24, 200917 yr Author 99/90/90 is very good and balanced. Do that :thumbup: I like this option :thumbup: any more ideas? And thanks for all the feedback everyone Chuck Norris doesn't ever need a compass; he randomly points somewhere and north goes there in order not to anger him.
April 24, 200917 yr 99/99/75 proberly would be best for pking and since you have 94 magic you could veng. It would also be the fastest i think because you could hit the most damage, training is also very easy hp wise because you could use guthans/bunyip/b2p. Proud Warlord of DragonwoodIf it's natural to kill, how come men have to go into training to learn how? ~ Joan Baez Rest in Peace 3xtermination
April 24, 200917 yr 99-90-90 or something, try slaying it and I'll love you #4500 to 91 rc - 03-03-09
April 24, 200917 yr Author 99-90-90 or something, try slaying it and I'll love you Whichever option I take I will be slaying it :thumbup: Chuck Norris doesn't ever need a compass; he randomly points somewhere and north goes there in order not to anger him.
April 24, 200917 yr For your next goal I'd recomend your first option ( 99 Attack, 99 Strength and 75 Defence), but with higher def, closer to 85 if not full on 99. :) KoAClan.org for adults
Create an account or sign in to comment