If they acquire nuclear weapons yes they are.

 

Maybe, but considering a large quantity of countries already do...

 

It's all about MAD bro.

Most of those countries have "stable" leadership though. Apart from NK. India and Pakistan are only likely to blow each other up as I understand it.

 

@Napalm: Ok.

If they acquire nuclear weapons yes they are.

 

Maybe, but considering a large quantity of countries already do...

 

It's all about MAD bro.

Most of those countries have "stable" leadership though. Apart from NK. India and Pakistan are only likely to blow each other up as I understand it.

 

@Napalm: Ok.

Dunno man, India is a pretty important part of the modern economic landscape. I think there are quite a few places that wouldn't survive an economic collapse from a nuke'd India.

If they acquire nuclear weapons yes they are.

 

Maybe, but considering a large quantity of countries already do...

 

It's all about MAD bro.

Most of those countries have "stable" leadership though. Apart from NK. India and Pakistan are only likely to blow each other up as I understand it.

 

@Napalm: Ok.

Dunno man, India is a pretty important part of the modern economic landscape. I think there are quite a few places that wouldn't survive an economic collapse from a nuke'd India.

I don't think it would be good for anywhere if anybody got nuked, I'm just commenting that everyone who has them as of yet is fairly predictable.

Time to finish up homework.

If they acquire nuclear weapons yes they are.

 

Maybe, but considering a large quantity of countries already do...

 

It's all about MAD bro.

Most of those countries have "stable" leadership though. Apart from NK. India and Pakistan are only likely to blow each other up as I understand it.

 

@Napalm: Ok.

Dunno man, India is a pretty important part of the modern economic landscape. I think there are quite a few places that wouldn't survive an economic collapse from a nuke'd India.

I don't think it would be good for anywhere if anybody got nuked, I'm just commenting that everyone who has them as of yet is fairly predictable.

Probably.

 

I don't like talking about religion or politics, they make me seem as stupid as I actually am.

yerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Post.

I don't like talking about religion or politics, they make me seem as stupid as I actually am.

Don't worry, usually when I argue, I know what I mean, but once I try to explain it I just sounds more and more retarded.

Man the vikings almost won....almost :(

That wall of text in Y_Guy's sig.

afuuuuuuuuuuu

Fuh WOOSH piddle piddle

 

Food time

FUS RO DAH!

So the next episode of the walking dead is titled "Nebraska".

Wondering if the group will try to head to Nebraska or there's some news relating to the whole zombie virus over there.

[hide=Spoilers] Or, as I said before, the group will find the overrun Fort Bennett and start making their way to Nebraska after learning news of possible refuge.[/hide]

THE WALKING DEAD WILL WALK TO NEBRASKA

I bet it has nothing to do with the state of Nebraska.

I dunno. Every title has been relevant to something in its respective episode.

Whats the point of honors programs in college? Does it just make you feel good or something?

The "prestige". If you take so many honors credits and pass, you get a "honor's stamp" or something on your degree. It's supposed to make employers think you took the hard route in college and are a hard worker.

So pretty much just to make you look and feel good.

Oh

Yeah but it could be code for something, like you said they're going to Fort Benning, maybe it's a callsign that they hear?

A possibility, yes.

 

It could be like Chupacabra, where it was mentioned in one scene that lasted 20 seconds. Or it could be like Cherokee Rose. Where we were introduced a motif that lasted through out the rest of the season.

Oh, hey. Seany's rank is "Bear Fur". Just noticed.

Yes, we know Seany is a furry.

My tummy hurts. Can you penetrate it?