Sam Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 What's so bad about it? I've seen people many a time giving putting it down, but I don't see why. Discuss. 2257AD.TUMBLR.COM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Runar Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 I've used it since 2007, and zero problems so far. Great program IMO. The Runar's (OSRS) DIY blog - most viewed Blogscape blog ever! Contract? ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laura Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 Same with AVG really, it's all based on synthetic performance. One scores higher than the other and one person takes this data without considering variables, which then spreads to another person; it's an epidemic. That, or they are real tests and one scores higher in detection rates, low in false positives, and low in resource consumption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbrideau Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 Meh, it goes with the experience I had with it. With Avast, [cabbage] loads of false positives and seems to not be able to fully delete the virus, AVG, a very low detection rate. Avira, on the other hand, while having some false positives too, actually detects the viruses and fully deletes them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now