What's so bad about it? I've seen people many a time giving putting it down, but I don't see why.

 

 

 

Discuss.

I've used it since 2007, and zero problems so far. Great program IMO.

Same with AVG really, it's all based on synthetic performance. One scores higher than the other and one person takes this data without considering variables, which then spreads to another person; it's an epidemic. That, or they are real tests and one scores higher in detection rates, low in false positives, and low in resource consumption.

Meh, it goes with the experience I had with it. With Avast, [cabbage] loads of false positives and seems to not be able to fully delete the virus, AVG, a very low detection rate. Avira, on the other hand, while having some false positives too, actually detects the viruses and fully deletes them.