Humidify Vs High Alch.

[skylor12344]

Which would be better to go from lvl 72(current lvl) to 77 mage with?

[FellonyNoob]

Which would be better to go from lvl 72(current lvl) to 77 mage with?

if it still works you get money when you humidify

[manitstinks]

its really the same but for humidify, you gotta pay more attention

[gorgoroth]

TBH you shouldnt do either. Superheating Iron Ore is the way to go.

[skylor12344]

umm...no offence but i need 2k more superheats than i do high alchs and humidifys so its completely out of the question, thank you for replying though.

[gorgoroth]

umm...no offence but i need 2k more superheats than i do high alchs and humidifys so its completely out of the question, thank you for replying though.

Well, you can do 1.2k Alchs an hour MAX, and 1.5k Superheats an hour MAX. So Superhating is going to be faster anyway. Its about 67k Alching and 75k Superheating. Superheating wins :)

 

You could always try the Superheat - Alching Combo. I've heard it gets about 130k EXP an hour.

[skylor12344]

yes but i cant afford the extra 2k nats atm so that puts it out anways

[gorgoroth]

Superheating will work out cheaper. If you Superheat Iron Ore you will get the following:

 

1 * Iron Ore = 193 gp

1 * Iron Bar = 371 gp

1 * Nature Rune = 282 gp

 

193 + 282 = 475 gp.

 

475 - 371 = 104 gp Loss

 

If you Alch Yew/Magic Longbows you will get the following (I believe these are the best items to High Alch? Or one of the most Common):

 

1 * Bow = 668 gp/1448 gp

1 * Nature Rune = 282 gp

Bow alchs for 768gp/1536gp

 

668 + 282 = 950 gp

1448 + 282 = 1730 gp

 

960 - 768 = 192 gp Loss

1730 - 1536 = 194 gp Loss.

 

Superheating is 88 - 90 gp cheaper per cast.

So ummm.... Superheating wins.

[skylor12344]

even if im losing money i still wont be able to afford the extra 2k nats so superheating is still out of the question...

[gorgoroth]

even if im losing money i still wont be able to afford the extra 2k nats so superheating is still out of the question...

:wall:

[skylor12344]

forget it ill figure it out for myself CLOSE THIS TOPIC PLEASE

[gorgoroth]

To answer your origianal question: Alching is faster than Humidifying. Whilst Humidifying offers some profit i would go with alching since it is about x2 faster. However, both of these methods are outdated.

[Gandorf61]

Locked upon owner's request.

 

Basically what the other users were trying to tell you is that you would save enough money by using the superheat spell rather than high alching that you could afford the extra 2k nature runes. ;-)