barrows armour vs dragon youll probly end up spending more money repairing overall than for full drag and is full dragon really worthy of 30M? can sum1 plse post in stats of full dragon and one of full dharoks, torags guthans, or veracs? all answers appreciated

this would go in help and advice...

 

 

 

also barows over dragon, it takes alot of time for the repair cost to get over dragona nd the defense is way way over dragon not to mention the set effects :wink:

Thx

if you dont care about the set effects and only want a helluva lot of def, then you use full torags + obby shield/drag sq+whip.

 

 

 

with obby shield that set would add up to about 6.5M.

 

 

 

this is BETTER def than full dragon. repairing the barrows parts of this would cost around 200k each time. say full drag is 30M.

 

 

 

(30M/200k)*15=2250.

 

 

 

it would take 2250 hours of PURE TRAINING to make it cost you the SAME amount as full dragon. not to mention it gives you way better defence.

 

 

 

thats 3 MONTHS of NON-STOP training.

 

 

 

i'd say you get barrows :wink:

yah but i think dragon for the looks i meen barrow look cool in all but dragon is original and since its worth so much only go's to rich and powerfull players if u have the money get drag and long looks best with itor scimmy maybe who no's

in my opinion, full dharoks and full veracs both look WAY better than full dragon,

 

 

 

but thats just me :wink: .

The thing about this debate is that both have their advantages and disadvantages:

 

 

 

Dragon - Certainly it's expensive and less defense than Barrows, but at the end of all your training, you can resell for full value, whereas with Barrows, you're tossing all that money away and can only resell a small amount.

 

 

 

Barrows - Better defense, but as I said, you can only resell for a fraction of the price you spent training with it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

These are both assuming the ideal conditions of NOT losing either armor from death.