Dexek Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 I agree with all the rules, but I think that username changes shoudl be available for a previous account...."purepure4774" .....rofl. PoetryIndexed Picture 1Indexed Picture 2 Killed my maxed Zerker pure April 2010 Rebooting Runescape Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deaners1212 Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 (I sort of went off topic of multi-login and referred to trading between 2 accounts of yours but I think you'll get the point) I think number 8 is a stupid rule and could careless if someone brings up the fact that it gives other players unfair advantages. God forbid someone who's successful in runescape decides to make another account weather it be a pure smither or tank mage or what have you, they're having fun doing it. If lower levels don't like that higher levels are making lvl 3s and spoiling them, don't whine about it, go and mine, fish, woodcut, pk, etc, and make a profit and then spoil yourself then maybe they'd understand why they shouldn't whine about it. Just because someone has what you don't doesn't mean you can't have it. So world class boxers should enter the minor leagues and beat the crap out of every one? Let's try to stay on the topic of virtual reality buddy, not real life. :wink: Back to P2p soon! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lim_Dul Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 (I sort of went off topic of multi-login and referred to trading between 2 accounts of yours but I think you'll get the point) I think number 8 is a stupid rule and could careless if someone brings up the fact that it gives other players unfair advantages. God forbid someone who's successful in runescape decides to make another account weather it be a pure smither or tank mage or what have you, they're having fun doing it. If lower levels don't like that higher levels are making lvl 3s and spoiling them, don't whine about it, go and mine, fish, woodcut, pk, etc, and make a profit and then spoil yourself then maybe they'd understand why they shouldn't whine about it. Just because someone has what you don't doesn't mean you can't have it. So world class boxers should enter the minor leagues and beat the crap out of every one? Let's try to stay on the topic of virtual reality buddy, not real life. :wink: His analogy is completely legitimate. The rule helps protect newer players from being slaughtered by pures with deep pockets. Assuming low level players who recently started playing runescape were cut to ribbons everytime they enter the wilderness, why would they keep playing? They can't hope to compete with accounts funded by lvl 120+ mains. The level system in the wilderness is there for a reason. That reason is not, so you can start a new account and give it millions of gp and weapons, to kill lower levels. The level system in the wilderness is to allow everyone to take on fighters of their own class, much like boxing. You could still start an account and make it just as good, but it is much more laborious because of the rule Jagex wisely implemented. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstrayDog Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 (I sort of went off topic of multi-login and referred to trading between 2 accounts of yours but I think you'll get the point) I think number 8 is a stupid rule and could careless if someone brings up the fact that it gives other players unfair advantages. God forbid someone who's successful in runescape decides to make another account weather it be a pure smither or tank mage or what have you, they're having fun doing it. If lower levels don't like that higher levels are making lvl 3s and spoiling them, don't whine about it, go and mine, fish, woodcut, pk, etc, and make a profit and then spoil yourself then maybe they'd understand why they shouldn't whine about it. Just because someone has what you don't doesn't mean you can't have it. So world class boxers should enter the minor leagues and beat the crap out of every one? Let's try to stay on the topic of virtual reality buddy, not real life. :wink: His analogy is completely legitimate. The rule helps protect newer players from being slaughtered by pures with deep pockets. Assuming low level players who recently started playing runescape were cut to ribbons everytime they enter the wilderness, why would they keep playing? They can't hope to compete with accounts funded by lvl 120+ mains. The level system in the wilderness is there for a reason. That reason is not, so you can start a new account and give it millions of gp and weapons, to kill lower levels. The level system in the wilderness is to allow everyone to take on fighters of their own class, much like boxing. You could still start an account and make it just as good, but it is much more laborious because of the rule Jagex wisely implemented. Thanks lim, you just said everything ive been trying to get across much more clearly then i was managing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Elephant Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 His analogy is completely legitimate. The rule helps protect newer players from being slaughtered by pures with deep pockets. Assuming low level players who recently started playing runescape were cut to ribbons everytime they enter the wilderness, why would they keep playing? They can't hope to compete with accounts funded by lvl 120+ mains. The level system in the wilderness is there for a reason. That reason is not, so you can start a new account and give it millions of gp and weapons, to kill lower levels. The level system in the wilderness is to allow everyone to take on fighters of their own class, much like boxing. You could still start an account and make it just as good, but it is much more laborious because of the rule Jagex wisely implemented. It's a well-stated argument, I'll admit, and your points are valid. That said, do you find it fair that a high level clan-leader with deep pockets can fund a mage-pure recruit and a range-pure recruit and hunt in packs, yet I - not a PKer - cannot fund a secondary account to buy my way through boring (yet crucial) quests that increase mobility (Grand Tree, Gnome Village, Fishing Contest, etc)? I do understand what you're saying and you were able to provide me with a reason for the rule at the very least. That helps me understand it more. I can't say it helps me agree with it any more, but I've said time and time again. As long as the rule is in place, I'll follow it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
audee Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 well personally i think the drop trading thing is to stop mules from helping f2pers from "expanding" their bank.. like u can store some seldom-to-be used stuff on a mule like arrows, ores or bars etc? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarritos Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 has anyone ever been banned for drop trading? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now