Hedgehog

He wants one. That's the whole point of the thread.

I love your topics L Just go solo bandos or something. Maybe attend a TMHT event :P

http://www.autohotkey.com/docs/Tutorial.htm

Not getting 99 for a while kiddo Also, I got a compliment. +1 self esteem

L Oh, just got this

I have almost no intention of getting 120 anymore, and I'm still in DGS

Melo Yelo, gummy worms, and pizza rolls = best meal I've ever had.

Getting 95 craft tonight, then maybe thieve a bit.

I'm a bit tired, you?

Hi

Mudkip transforming into some other pokemon

Luke what?

I'll miss you, Diane ;/

Living rock creatures have nno defense. Mauls can train any stat so your issue there is moot. Terrordogs are an easy points task if you unlock slayer rings. As far as ranging goes, there aren't any tasks that are worth it. Melee everything (apparently pps is comparable to melee at miths/steels). Its not worth dramatically slowing down slayer xp, so melee past max cb and chin for 99 range.

I think Jagex gets more money off the cards than anything else, so they're offering an incentive for players to buy them instead of using a credit card.

Pay a noob at the ge 100k/hour to die for you.

It was a trap

COME GET [bleep]ED UP

Which invariably resurrects the "define normal" argument. Having played 'scape for 5 years or more now, I've gained a grand total of about 20m exp on my major account. Gross experience points earned throughout total playtime would be somewhere closer to 50m, but by no means is that "a lot". "normalcy" is just about as ridiculous as the "efficiency" argument. I don't see how the efficiency argument is ridiculous. PM me your answer so we don't start a huge argument again (that goes for all of you).

Or just accept that your side lost.

Whew! At least you made up for it and cancelled the first one. So in effect you abstained. Which reminds me of one of their cheap biasing tactics: Make a first vote that only accepts "yes" votes, including the ones tricked into voting "yes" by mislabeling the button for a few hours, and the "no" voters' names that the "yes" vote cheaters fradulently voted because no login was required. Then tell all the people opposed to the idea that the correct way to register a "no" vote is to abstain, secure in the knowledge that lots of "no" voters not paying enough attention will mistakenly abstain during the REAL phase 2 vote. Which plenty of them announced they in fact did on the debate thread. And I hope I've made it clear that I agree with you - W/FT was coming no matter how the voting went, but all the biasing tactics they built into the "vote" probably did turn out to be adequate to achieve the desired result. Though how could we know this? Is it not interesting that the voting split remained almost entirely unchanged since literally about an hour into the tallying? (When I first saw the standings) It never varied more than a percentage point one way or another from 90% / 8% / 2% THE ENTIRE VOTING PERIOD. At least to my memory, and I was paying pretty close attention. Not proof of fraud by any means, but a bit suspicious. If they hadn't given us PLENTY of reason to BE suspicious, it would have never crossed my mind that they might have just written a script to display their desired "results." That seems awfully paranoid

93 crufting

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOVK_iQvvsw