Jump to content

None2None

Members
  • Posts

    585
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by None2None

  1. No, it makes Runescape the same as most games.. No it doesn't... I explained that before... Kinda More-so Anyway, added DarkVincent to the support list, thanks :)
  2. ^^Please Read... I specifically said durability wouldn't be included... Plus most MMPRPGs have those qualities... No Jagex wouldn't be sued... No it wouldn't become another version of WoW for the sake that we have other skills that are non-combat based :roll: Anyhoo. I'll update later... Busy... Bump.
  3. At level 65, you shouldn't be training on 92's in the first place... Most level 50-70 members train on a level 13 monster... (Rock Crabs) But if you insist on attacking higher-leveled monsters, here are your choices 50+ I completely disagree with your idea because of the reasoning you put behind it.
  4. Well... I guess you could try... But I'm sure when Jagex doesn't recognize the .dat that is there, they know something is up and your computer would most likely be monitored... I don't recommend trying regardless the outcome
  5. Ugh, I hate putting down these ideas, but it's not that simple! Simple ways to get around this... Delete your cookies... :? ... Once the game is running, it doesn't need a cookie anymore... Therefore you can delete them and begin a new session while still on... Jagex does something like what you're talking about with UIDs, but those can still be deleted... Pic of what I'm talking about cookie wise: Here's the UID Jagex uses as well as the location: ^That can easily be deleted and that forces a new one to be made. (goes along with your "It could just be the computers ID number" thing)
  6. Omfg no. Skiller. Dur. There are thousands of us members... And for the total level suggestions: A Log Burner (level 3, firemaking pure) had 99 firemaking as his only skill (low total level) until he was ranked #10 in it... He was most definately not a macroer. Horrible. How about we kill the bots instead of working around them... :roll:
  7. From the sound of it, you were AFK training mage... Idk if that's true or not... but either way, it's not Jagex's fault you "just forgot to log out!"... It's your own... And this is most definitely a rant and not a bug... Oh and by the way you broke a rule AFK training or not: Linked: (last section) http://www.runescape.com/kbase/viewarti ... le_id=2077
  8. Updated... I put up a new section... "My Skilling Outfits..." basically being what I wear around Runescape. I got 99 cooking, so I updated that picture, and now I've updated all of the skill achievement's pictures to only show the newest picture of that stat (in the No_Cb_Skils section...) Hopefully that cuts down on the lag I... And I assume others... have been having ;)
  9. Ooo, I like the new spin, sephiroth_king, somewhat like a pre-war or during-war mini-quest for lower levels or other people who want to take part in a different way. I like the idea... I'll add it with a note on the page. ;)
  10. Wow Silentsurf, I love those examine examples... I'll have to add them to my front page :P But yea, you get what I'm talking about... Higher leveled monsters/smithers would drop/make better weapons and armors than lower leveled monsters/smithers that can drop/make the same weapon. And yea... Whips were probably a bad example because only demons can drop them... But there would still be a chance for a higher one and a lower one, yea. (and about the durability that you mentioned as being complicated... Yea... I didn't add that... We'll work in baby steps ;) )
  11. umm. noDon't get that post... But yea, you're right... As I said... That's the point, adds a new dimension to pking/staking/fighting in general :P
  12. : 4 more added Yea, you're right... but then again, I personally think they should change the exp given... Won't totally add that yet... Either that or have it periodically change (like they move every 20-30 ores taken or something)... That's up for Jagex to decide. ;)
  13. Ha, and screw over skillers? great idea =D> (I hate people like you who are that closed minded ... At least schmuall took us into account...) and schmuall, I heard you say that writing a script would be hard... and to be completely honest, you're relying on the fact that macroing programs arn't able to take things from the client, which I believe they can... Therefore they could easily get all the IDs for the quest and etc. TBH - Writing a script would be cake... Knowing a bit of Java myself... If I had the resources, I bet I could make a script to do the whole quest in less than 500 lines of code :? So I don't support the idea in general, sorry... It will just have to be more direct in shutting down the bots, not patching the game...patches can just be opened again. But if nothing's there to open them, they can't be... I personally believe the idea's too small to work for more than a week... We just need something perminent.
  14. Okay. Don't add me yet. One thing I'd want you to work out first... Is how will this be any different than Rune Mysteries, which macroers seem to have gotten past :-k And schmuall, as for writing a script... ALL item IDs are already known locations are just told to be clicked, NPCs have their own IDs as well, so it wouldn't be hard to locate them... I don't think it would really work.
  15. Not at all... Many games use this... Diablo II, WoW, KO, CO, and obviously Maplestory. It's not a new idea, but considering it hasn't been suggested yet :P I'll add ya, but just tell me if you want to get off the list and I"ll take you off when I next update it.
  16. The mining sites wouldn't move but the rocks would maybe move a couple feet or so. Thanks for clarifying that ;)
  17. Wow! Sorry, I've been gone for a while... But I'm very glad to say that I've had to add 9 new supporters since then! 120+! :D
  18. Thanks Stewie, I added you.. And thanks to Saradomin for reading :roll: #-o *Kicks back to page 1.
  19. newb4lyfe7, you're absolutely right, there would be many new downsides in the idea... But I'm sure players would find one way or another to use an anti-scam in this. And at the same time, I can't imagine many times when you're trading for a whip, or even a rune scimmy, where you buy more than one. Maybe 2 in some cases, but even then, it wouldn't be horribly hard to check the second screen :) I'll add you for now, because it seemed like a scepticle support, but if you'd like to be taken off, just ask ;)
  20. 98 cooking, Fixing my first page to only show the most recent stats in each skill :P
  21. Make a new account as a pure, skiller, staker, anything. Just start over... That's what I did :P Just don't drop transfer - that's against the rules. :)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.