[hide] [/hide] :thumbsup: Been a while since I have seen you on Poor :) I'll throw in my two cents. I find that COD is an arcade shooter, and BF is a less arcade shooter. While both might have tactics I just find BF has more. It's not a massive difference, but enough to make BF more enjoyable. Also, COD always felt like a 'loan wolf' game. Even if you was in a squad you rarely helped others out. It was always about yourself and K/D. I found BF more about teamwork and W/L. I always strived for 1.50+ K/D but if it fell below that it wasn't horrible. I always made sure my W/L was always more wins then losses and by a fair amount. If I had to switch classes to make sure our team would win, I would do it. Whatever it takes. Maybe I am biased on the time I have played both games. COD MW2, second prestige, BO only got to level 44. On BFBC2, got to level 34(which I am very very proud of), and on BF3 got to level 45 if I am not mistaken. I just found BF to be more realistic...if that is even possible I don't know but that's how I feel about it. So in short, I find BF more enjoyable. The realism the game adds with added tactics, the importance of teamwork, and vehicles just made the experience all the more enjoyable. I have moved on from my shooter days so it could be possible my argument could be thrown out, but I still think my thoughts are valid across the board.