PaperClipsYaaaar

ctp please post in this thread

The only part of the bible that condemns homosexuality is Leviticus of the Old Testament, and if you follow Leviticus, then you must also follow the rules within it regarding incense, altars, and meat offerings. Genesis 2:23-24 [hide]The man said, "This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called 'woman,' for she was taken out of man." For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh. [/hide] And thanks for the response on genes, but it makes me wonder about the Hypothalamus thing that ClareJonsson posted. That is a description of reproduction, not a condemnation of homosexuality. For example, a passage in the bible that talks about vaginal sex does not condemn oral sex. Once again, the only part of the bible that condemns homosexuality is Leviticus in the Old Testament, which contains a whole bunch of other outdated rules.

I'm Steve.

Guys suck. You should turn gay. Mmm, considering it :P The hungarian women are HOTT! Those are men in drag. The real women are hairy. I love how Paperclips gets all the Hungarian love whilst he has never been there whatsoever. :XD: I'm kind of worrisome at the moment. I still have a little bit of german homework remaining but instead of doing it, I watch south park online and browse Tip.it at the moment. I also have a book that I have to read for school but I'm only about halfway through (310th page). On Thursday I'll be having a German exam as well. Misi is number the two in hungary in the studying of the english the writings!

The only part of the bible that condemns homosexuality is Leviticus of the Old Testament, and if you follow Leviticus, then you must also follow the rules within it regarding incense, altars, and meat offerings. The XX/XY genes are identifiers of a person's sex. They have very little to do with the actual makeup of a person.

Guys suck. You should turn gay. Mmm, considering it :P The hungarian women are HOTT! Those are men in drag. The real women are hairy.

Guys suck. You should turn gay.

Rapist

Wow, you are so ignorant. Social anxiety is a psychological problem, just as bad as depression, and it often leads to depression. By saying it's "normal", you deem that social anxiety doesn't exist, and that all the people who suffer from it are idiots imagining things. IT'S A PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEM YOU MORON. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_anxiety You can't even imagine what I went through. No point in arguing with you though, you're a stuck up idiot and you know it. What's your comback for your ignorance you loser, that psycholoists made up "social anxiety" and that it doesn't exist, that are the symptoms and made up and that you just decided so? Ffs, ignorant fool. Go tell that to entire forum communities that suffer from it! Shut up. Thinking of social anxiety as a medical disease will not help you get rid of it, no matter whether or not it really is a disease.

I KNOW IT FEELS GOOD BUT YOU HAVE TO PULL IT OUT!!!

Can I ask what the necessity behind that was? If (s)he wants to call him/herself that, fine. Surely, anyone that should be respected in a debate should see through any mask being put up by the user, and focus on their actual argument anyway. :? Because fake accounts are annoying, you dumb[cabbage].

Intelligent design is not God guided evolution. Just a hint of what it's about: I can't really understand where you get the idea to defend ID and evolution as if they were on the same page. Yeah, it seems I've been using the wrong term all this time. Very embarrassing -.- The correct name is Theistic Evolution. Here's something about how I got confused because I forgot that American fundies had taken over the name Intelligent Design: So replace ID with Theistic Evolution and everything I said still makes sense. There is no conflict between Genesis and Theistic Evolution, and thus no conflict between the bible and evolution. ------------------------- And only some of them agree with scientific experiments, observations, and artifacts. It's your choice whether to accept or ignore science.

Intelligent Design does not state that God "idly watched things happen." Intelligent Design is Evolution in which God is in control. Creationism is a human interpretation of Genesis, where each day is thought of in terms of a human day, and each creation (of nature, land, animals, humans, etc) is thought of as God directly zapping things onto earth. Intelligent Design is a much sounder interpretation of Genesis, with the acknowledgment that God's days and methods are probably grander, more complex, and over a longer period of time than previously assumed. More importantly, ID and Creationism are not equally viable viewpoints: ID matches scientific experiments and observations, while Creationism does not. Please address my other replies to you, Korskin. I've been waiting for your responses. Please stop ignoring Intelligent Design. There is no conflict between the Bible and evolution. There is no conflict between Intelligent Design and evolution. There is a conflict between creationism and evolution, otherwise known as ignorance vs evolution.

DD can I take your sig and username and password blink twice for yes

You are making the mistake of thinking that the scientific and religious explanations represent different paths. From a viewpoint that merges both science and religion (and, in fact, combines your own words), humans have higher evolved intellect handed to us by a divine creator. That is intelligent design, and that is what should be taught in theology.

In science, we are not distinguished from the animal kingdom. We are the most intelligent member of the animal kingdom. In religion. we are distinguished from the animal kingdom because we are God's chosen creatures.

I will read your essay please pm and then send me money through paypal for this free grading that you will send me money through paypal for.

Your "yes" statement is incorrect. If yes, then God created evolution and guided it towards the formation of man. The fact that man has a soul, superior to all other animals, is proof that God is creator and governor of evolution. You mean our evolutionary ancestors. "We," the humans, were not around back then. Humanity is distinguished for its ability to make intelligent choices. The creatures you described who "act purely on instinct" were not human. I understand that in your layman's eyes, the word "animal" denotes lower, subhuman intelligence. This is another situation where you assume that the layman and scientific definitions of a word are the same, even though they are in fact very different. Science deals purely with the physical world. All beings that live and breathe are classified as animals. This classification does not carry any connotations of lower intelligence, and it does not deny humanity's superiority in biblical history. They change due to God. Apes do make intelligent choices, actually. They are definitely less intelligent than humans though. In any case, the bible never said God would only give choice to humans. The ape-to-human life is not considered human. Only humans are considered human. Because Man is God's ultimate goal. Man is made in God's image. That is why Man can read the bible but his predecessors on the evolutionary tree could not. That is why the bible was given to Man. And I have countered all of your facts, as stated above. You don't seem to understand evolution. Generations of changes created humans. The very first humans were able to have choice. That is why they are called humans. There were no humans without the ability to make choice. Those who were before humanity on the evolutionary tree are called predecessors for a reason. They were not humans. They were before humans. So humans inherited choice from God the moment they evolved from their predecessor, who is not considered human. Remember, humanity was created on the sixth day, not the first day. There was plenty of time for evolution to occur. Yes. Humans are alive, with choice. That is why they are called humans. Because Man is made in God's image but ape isn't. Just because apes came earlier than humans doesn't mean that God made apes in his image. He obviously didn't, because he went on to make humans and he specifically told humans that we are made in his image. I agree. I have never said apes are God's image.

ok please now elaborate..pm me..im a Christian, and im also studing psych, socio, and a interpersonal speech in college..behaviorism isn't against us.. just because we study how behavior can effect you psyche..i don't understand how that is against "beliefs" do pm some stuff on this..and get a real answer from a Christian..not what you think we should think.. She's saying that psychologists shouldn't use their personal bias against patients. So a Christian psychologist shouldn't express his personal disapproval of transsexuals if he is counseling a transsexual. This sort of fair, ethical psychologist is obviously not the kind that the OP's mother wants to hire.

DO NOT STEAL http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/1913/wwidas6.jpg http://img107.imageshack.us/img107/7587/blueib0.jpg http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/2589/greends5.jpg http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/2696/pinkws4.jpg http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/5518/purpletz8.jpg http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/6083/forkidsaz7.jpg DO NOT STEAL

And you of course think everyone agrees with you? Problems generally don't arise when one person expresses his views. Problems generally arise when there is a conflict of views among people. If you don't accept that evolution is an issue in the religion vs atheism debate, I don't really have much more to say to you. We should also all listen to the Simpsons: You are welcome to disagree with me as long as you give me some explanation of what your view is. I have already given you my explanation. Now you have to give me yours. Yes, I know you told me to read Genesis (and I have read Genesis, thank you for your concern), but I have already shown you that Genesis does not interfere with Evolution in my replies to you and Defender. Your simpsons quote is also inaccurate. Intelligent Design states that God created and guides evolution. It does not undermine his power in any way.

I've always been curious about this. Does your desire to be a woman involve negative feelings towards your current anatomy? Namely, the schlong and hoverballs?

what's up with everybody saying there's no evidence? I hear this alot, but not yet 1 person has been able to name that "common ancestor" that we seemed to have evolved from. http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-90 ... yopithecus Please address the other parts of my post.

I hear this alot, but not yet 1 person has been able to name that "common ancestor" that we seemed to have evolved from. http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-90 ... yopithecus Please address the other parts of my post.

I'm saying that in an evolution vs religion debate we have a demarcation problem. Example is Intelligent design which is not pure science but has some aspects of science. Evolution might be pure science but when it conflicts with the Bible we can no longer have a pure scientific debate as the Bible isn't science. Intelligent design is evolution + god. It is not a science because it includes the supernatural, but that does not mean it is wrong. As I said in my previous post, science deals only with the physical environment. It does not affirm or deny god. There is no demarcation problem. Evolution is science, and Intelligent Design is science + religion. To Recap: 1) Evolution: Correct Science 2) Intelligent Design: Correct Science, Accurate Religion 3) Creationsm: Incorrect Science, Accurate Religion Science classes should teach: Evolution Religion classes should teach: Intelligent Design It doesn't say physical appearance. Why would God have a single physical appearance anyway, when there are so many different skin colors and appearances among humans? We are all made in God's spiritual appearance, and that does not interfere with evolution at all. Again, nowhere in the bible is there a description God's physical image, and nowhere does it say that we are made in his physical image. Once again, there is no talk of God's physical image in the bible, and no talk of us reflecting his physical image. Also, just for your knowledge, we did not evolve from monkeys. We evolved from a common ancestor to both monkeys and humans.