PaperClipsYaaaar

she told me she doesn't enjoy sex with you but she does it because she loves you. it is a tragedy

lol i agree being intelligent sucks we should all just erase stuff from our memories that are not cheap mainstream macdonalds-fueled commercial products because who needs writers anyway we have xbox

your internet girlfriend is bleh i saw pics hydraides: pick o nsoemone else because i am not available

i cant' do boobs on this calculator http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/8889/photo14hx5.jpg yeah thats right mario and i got it for free too i dont pay for no gameboys http://img152.imageshack.us/my.php?image=photo14kt1.jpg it was from highschool

if it was unsmooth then how did i just score a wife

and this girl started talking to me and she knew my name but i didn't know hers. and she was asking me all these intimate questions like "how are you" I think that means we have to get married now also I kind of stuttered because that was my third time talking to a girl and i havent practiced much yet, but i pretended that i was doing some extreme computing in my head and i think she understood because i transmitted the excuse to her psychopathly (i can send emails from my brain)

That's because you're a girl. Your parents trust you more.

You have talked about "problems with compatibility" in numerous posts, but you have never shown us any of those problems. What, exactly, is wrong with theistic evolution besides your personal bias against it? Before you reply, please read this post. It is related to your concerns for compatibility: http://forum.tip.it/viewtopic.php?p=534 ... t=#5349599 Edit: If you have no problems with theistic evolution besides your personal bias, then please describe your bias (i.e. what about evolution makes you feel uncomfortable) so I can address it. Sometimes religion can't explain things either. That is why you need to combine both. Science explains how we are made. Religion explains why and by who. There is no overlap. Science + Religion = Correct Viewpoint Evolution + Creation = Theistic Evolution Disregard doesn't mean disprove. Biologists don't bring religion into their work simply because it is outside their field of study. In the same way, biologists wouldn't bring astronomy or nuclear physics into their work. God. The most frequent criticism isn't that it's not science. The most frequent criticism is that it's wrong science.

craigslist

SKEET SKEET SKEET SKEET SKEET SKEET

http://badwebcomics.blogspot.com/2007/08/vg-cats.html

You want to go to New York, California, Arizona, Nevada and Florida in three months, while working?

Life by abiogenesis became conscious (not suddenly, but gradually) because God decided it should. The wikipedia definition you quoted applies to both Intelligent Design and Theistic Evolution. However, since ID rejects science but Theistic Evolution accepts science, you should choose Theistic Evolution. Here is the wikipedia article you should read. Edit: Your original quote said "Life by natural selection became conscious..." Natural selection refers to something completely different. Creatures in natural selection are already conscious. No, but according to God we are the final most dominant species. This does not conflict with evolution. Yes, according to God. This does not conflict with evolution. No. The bible makes distinctions between humans and other animals, but not between one race and another. That is why domination by humans is okay, but skin color domination is not. This does not conflict with evolution. Evolution does not state how animals should be treated. According to the bible, humans are worth more than other animals and should reign over them. This does not conflict with evolution. I agree. Then why do you continue to claim that errors in abiogenesis would imply errors in evolution?

lol

Why is that a contradiction? Clearly, the most evolved and therefore best species is going to dominate all the other species. Yes, that's true but that's not what I was saying. The point was that we should make sure that theories are compatible with each other. Evolution tells us how life evolved and abiogenesis tells us how life began. They complete each other. If there is an intelligence behind the origin of life, perhaps we need to reconsider the theory of evolution as well. Abiogenesis and Evolution occur on the same timeline, but their validity is not linked. The Big Bang and the expansion of the universe occur on the same timeline, but if the Big Bang is proven false, that does not mean the expansion of the universe is also false. I agree that intelligence behind the origin of life would also mean intelligence behind evolution. This is called theistic evolution.

Irony?

Do you intentionally try to sound like an asshat or do the words just vomit out of you naturally?

That question was asked in response to a paragraph you wrote in this thread. Please refer back to that post to see the paragraph that I quoted above my question: http://forum.tip.it/viewtopic.php?p=533 ... t=#5337511 Abiogenesis and Evolution are not like Newton and Einstein. Newton and Einstein are parallel. Abiogenesis happens before Evolution.

hahahaha

and I will be your chairwoman

The library does not make distinctions between a good book and a bad book, but you would make the distinction of borrowing the good book. Does that mean you contradict the library?

Something about us being the superior, God-given race, and that we should enslave this new race under divine mandate. Or something along those lines. I hope that's what happens. I need me some sex slaves.

I agree, and we don't really need her as eyecandy as much anymore either. Last season we pretty much just had her and Niki/Jessica. This season we have her, Niki/Jessica, the Japanese chick in Hiro's storyline (sometimes hot, sometimes not), the black chick from New Orleans, the Irish chick (once again, sometimes hot sometimes not), and in the next episode Kristen Bell is joining. Even if it was just Kristen Bell that would be enough to replace Claire and Niki/Jessica. homo