Gbpackers31

#2 is stunning! It's unique, and I love it. Of course, they are all so good.. erm.. :ohnoes: ..I vote for #2!!

I have a quick question. I tried to search for it, but couldn't find an answer. So, sorry if this has already been asked but... When going about an image randomizer (like Uzzisoft or another one), do all the pictures you have on there have to add up to 100kb or less? It's probably obvious, but I wouldn't want to go over the size limit on there and end up with no signature :ohnoes:

Alright, so i tried to use C4D's... Yeah, not sure if it turned out right. Here it is: It's kind of blurry. Not sure. I was reading a tutorial about some of the stuff in that tag, though :? My execution is horrible though..

Thanks for the feedback. So both you and Ouchy (and Sallaste) agree that I need to use C4D's, but make them more effective....hmmmm... I'm going to need to read some more tutorials on this! I have a question about C4D's though: How do you go about using them? Like, in my case, most of my C4D's I've used in my pieces are set to Overlay, and I try to blend them into the background usually. That's not how you're supposed to use them, right? Anyway, here's my latest piece, #16: I made these prior to reading tutorials, though. I just thought to post them here. Next tag, I'll try to do my best to incorporate better C4D use :

Alright, here's my latest that I whipped up: What do you think about this one? I couldn't decide on a border, though, so I made two. I didn't use a C4D on this one. i had one but I felt it looked better without it. What do you think?

Sorry for the double post, but I wasn't sure if this post should just be an edit to my previous. Anyway, new piece I just created... I personally like this one (especially the 1st of the two versions) I like the colors. Plus, I think I did a good job limiting my C4D use : But of course, I'll wait for a judge to see about that. EDIT: I noticed that lightning was a little pixelated -.- So, i tried something. However, I had to change the lighting a little as it was a little too bright when I fixed the pixelation. So anyway, here's another version: i don't like the lighting as much...

Alright. Here is my first attempt today. I made four differrent versions :? So, did I do a better job with the C4D's? I fear that I put them like ham on a cheese roll again :( What do you think?

Thanks for your comments :thumbsup: Im going to try to limit my use of C4D's. It's extremely hard though because they just look so darn cool :) But I'm going to try to. As I read more tutorials and learn new techniques, I shouldn't be so reliant on them to add to the signature seeing as I have alternative methods. So, I need to learn, learn, learn! :

I decided to download GIMP a few weeks ago, and I've been experimenting with it for some time. I was hoping for some comments on my work that I've done recently... I haven't actually followed a tutorial to make a signature yet. Instead, I've looked at a few, watched some YouTube videos on it, and incorporated some of the methods into my work. Well, anyway, here they are :? #1 My first work in GIMP. Here, I was mainly just messing around. I had no idea what I was doing ( :lol: ), and created everything under one layer... #2 This piece is mainly just smudging :? At the time, i did not know of anything to do or put in it, so I just smudged something out... Also saved as one layer... #3 I don't really like this piece at all, but I just decided to include it. I tried out the path tool, and failed miserably. Text is also bleh. Also saved this as one layer... #4 My first signature where I put a fractal in. However, I dont really like it anymore. It's ugly to me (as well as you Im sure). At the time, I was quite proud of it, though :) #5 Again, I do no really like this piece at all, but I just decided to include it. #6 Here is one I just worked up the other day. I tried to flow, however, I think I failed. The right side has some lines going the opposite direction -.- #7 These two I made the other day as well. I personally like them. Of course, I dont have high standards like everyone else does ;) Of the two, though, my favorite is the plain red... #8 Not too sure about this one. I recently made it. To be honest, I was just messing around with some brushes I just recently downloaded. I then played with filters and got a cool background on the default size canvas. So, I decided to try something, and, well, this is the result :P #9 Again, made recently. I really like this piece, but I'm not sure how everyone feels about it. Personally, i like the black and white one with the red at the top better than the colored one... #10 Made 4 different versions of this piece, and I'm not sure which I like best. To me, the text is sort of bleh, though.... #11 Here is one with 2 different versions. And again, I'm not sure which is the better of the two.... #12 Here is my first attempt at a sprite signature. I wanted to test out the path tool and neon, seeing as how i read up on a tutorial on both. Personally, I like the second of the two the best.... So, What do you think? I appreciate all Comments and criticisms, but please don't flame : EDIT: Here's my new work so far: #13 (unlucky :uhh: ) #14 #15 #16 #17 :D

Agreed, with the hints that Mod Mark H gave us in the screenshot: I'm positive on it being a Dorgeshuun Quest. Which is good, as it is a really nice storyline (in my humble opinion). He said "between the box" but Zanik seems to be outside the box...line...thing.... I don't really understand what you're trying to say... [hide=warning, spoiler!]Zanik was sucked into the Bandos box in the end of Land of the Goblins, so she's inside, right? Well, with the cryptic hint of Mark it seems she isn't really in it either, but she's definitely not outside it. Between the box to me sounds like it has something to do with dimensions...[/hide] I think he was trying to say that Mod MMH says the work "Zanik" outside his little "box" that he makes with the two lines in his post in the screenshot. The box could be what you're referring to, but it could be about his "box" that he seems to intentionally make in his post, implying, perhaps, that the clue is within those two lines of text.

This post from MMH is about the 150th quest and people wanting hints i guess. The post is found on the L&H - The Chasm of Lights thread in the recent Updates. Page 8... QFC: 15-16-730-58515125 I wonder what that means? Do you think the storyline for the 150th quest will center around Zanik?

Surprisingly enough, Im addicted to these fourms (And the Tip.it site in general). Even though I dont have many posts, I'm constantly on here looking at posts, visiting the gallery, looking at screens, checking help and advice to see if I can learn new things, and whatever else I feel like reading :thumbsup:

Tip.it Theme. It's the easiest on the eyes IMO. Plus, it looks pretty snazzy :thumbup:

Personally, I think (and hope) that Runescape would come to the Wii if any at all. The Wii is a cheap and popular console. I've read that it is much easier and cheaper to make games than any other console (especially the PS3). Also, why would they create the game to a console who only has an installed user base of just over 21 Million. It makes more sense to create it for the console with the most users. Also, the Wii Remote is the closest thing to a mouse. It just makes more sense to me....Plus, the Wii has a more varied audience. Didn't yesterday MMG say that they want Runescape to appeal to an audience of 18-80 year olds? As in the 360, this game would have to be completely online right? To go online on the 360, don't you need XBox Live? I don't know, on account I don't have one, but if so, wouldn't you have to pay for the subscription of Live and RS membership? :? The only problem I see would be hardware. Would it be able to render that many players and animations at once? How would it be for say the GE? I realize our players don't make many motions in the game except when we move and do things, but how would it handle it? I don't know system facts very much, nor do I know specifications, but I'd have to wonder that. Either way, I think Runescape on consoles would be a neat idea. But I'd still prefer to be on the computer with a mouse and keyboard handy, being able to surf the internet at the same time.

I'd suggest looking at this if anything. This helped me diagnose my problem as it seems like yours is the same as mine... http://www.playtool.com/pages/artifacts/artifacts.html It sounds like it could be the failing video RAM....

Playing HD doesn't ruin graphic cards. High temperatures or a high overclock do. Therefore I'd say look for the cause of the problems, instead of just letting it artifact. But the HD causes the overheating, thus causing the failure. Sometimes, the overheating has already caused too much damage to fix it....

This same thing happened to me. All of a sudden it would just make those huge graphics errors, then it would start artifacting... Now, my computer is messed up and I'm forced to play on low detail. I'd say stop playing on HD before it ruins your graphics card like mine... :cry: Bauke, though, gives good advice. I read that that would probably solve your problems if you can change your settings and its actually not permanently ruined.

Just got this: Woot! Need only 6.5k more coal (and 2k more iron ore) until I have enough for 68 smithing! :

This is off topic, but 666 posts! On Friday the 13th! That's like infinitely bad luck :o :shock: if you believe in all that of course =p Back on topic: It's probably something to do with the chick, since he examined it..... or maybe not... Though shouldn't this be in the Runescape pictures thread? :?

It looks like the greater demon on the right (these are greater demons right? Never killed them..) is throwing up.... :?

One of my friends that I just met a couple weeks ago mining in f2p had a cool name i thought. It was... Ichipurasuni He was a skiller, and said that "ichipurasuni," in japanese (I think) means "one plus two." 3! Just as he is a lvl 3 skiller :thumbsup:

Yeah, they were released on May 21 when the new level up messages were released. Here's coming from the update: However, they still are pretty cool, even if old! :thumbsup:

Yes, I guess I was a bit too hopeful of having a way to see if Jagex really does ban everybody they know is a bug abuser or if they are all about short term profit. The person who showed 97M and said he got it from the glitch was probably lying or by far the biggest abuser of this bug. I think the video on the second page might show the spying delay. I watched it late yesterday when I was already quite sleepy, but I think it showed the player using this glitch. For me it says that the video is not available in my country right now. Can someone post that vid instead of a link. I have the same problem. Do you mean this? Pretty crazy if you ask me.... so many people.......... OT: Haha just watched the video and saw Mr. "The Jagex Conspiracy Theorem" thread mastermind say "The Penguin Is A Nuclear Bomb, Run" at 1:46 :lol:

This is something I definately have an issue with. I've only been playing RS again for around 3 weeks after a 1.5 year break and i'm sure it's already been discussed to death, but combat familiars only being really useful in multi combat areas was something I was pretty disappointed with. Sure, it's nice having the extra healing/bag space from certain familiars, but considering summoning raises your combat level, the affect it has in single combat is pretty underwhelming. Of course, my summoning still definately needs some work, but those are my first impressions on combat familiars. Fight me and my unicorn in a no food duel? Once again, COMBAT familiar. Yes, we understand the benefits of healers and beasts of burdens. Point here is whether combat familiar is useful, and by combat it means offensive power, not passive healing, stats boost etc. Imo, Combat familiars are not useful enough to warrant using them. As Bedman shows, A familiar like the Unicorn is more useful than a combat familiar. Because of this, combat familiars aren't useful since you have better options. By themselves, I feel that some combat familiars are quite useful and worth using. However, since you can only have one familiar at a time, I would choose a Unicorn over a titan or any combat familiar any day (taken I have 88 summoning :P ). The Unicorn, Bunyip, Pak Yak, etc. are far more useful than combat familiars, and thus are why combat familiars are not a viable choice to use.

Ok so one (or more) penguins let you spy them more than once, so basically, get 50 points, run to larry, cash in for experience in gold, rinse and repeat. I understand as much; that doesn't seem nearly quick enough to get these "free 99s" that everyone is talking about... Is it... 50 x level x point? so if you were level 50... 50 x 50 x 50 = 125,000? That's more understandable... That's just for one "round" of 50 points. With this glitch, you could get 50 points, run to Larry, exchange for experience, and repeat...over and over and over...... -.-