darthnixon16

you learn 2 tlk g00d leiks wot i's do! Only improvements i see are a interesting and understanding of a model econemy effectilly. I seem to have better confidience some how #-o . No idea how that works and incredible patients (woo 94 rc) and fast typing skills. On a side note playing RS saved me money in real life due to not needing to buy a new 360 game or the like every few months.

what makes pvp interesting is ko thats you work for and got. Veng does that in sytle. even the DDS you had to switch to so if you didn't expect that good hit you missed you spec chance. Magic is underpowered and i have 94 magic before anybody asks. Its very easy to beat with hide and godsword. You will be hit 30s alot and you have to take a few hits to even attempt the barrage. Blitz now doesn't stall now because blitz+AGS spec can ko anybody in no matter what armour they have alot. Range is fun and pretty balanced these days. As much as a great dark bow spec is murder they never hit it and its safely slow. I used to own a AGS agreed thats it truely overpowered in PVP and vs monsters to be fair. I would just camp in matches till the person got 20ish hp which is certain in matches if you hit a non spec 50 or combo around 30-40. These then gives you a spec at about 40ish which is extremly common. I think Jagex should nerf their gear and boast others. They need to put more skill into the PVP ultimatey.

americans voted simply. Obama. Black. america look good if he gets anywhere. McCain. Old. Palin. she so dum...... From what i read over the net and talking in UK most most people are clueless on Obamas polices just just wanted "that black guy". For my opinion the word "change" needs to be taxed it was so overdone that it was better than a advertising campain. You have people who have no idea how Obama plans to change things just that he wants to in some shape or form.

lol my Obamas grans age McCain still got another 10 years :shock: he could serve another two tersm with that. I thinks its not "real" news but it for one shows the whole granma insident wasn't overplayed. And Obama will get simplathy votes.....

no unless you start saying whites have supreme God given good looks or something. Even if it is racist you are not alone by a long shot. I read a research topic on dating sites and people go for there own ethic cleaily most often.

Many of these drugs have medical potential, as we have already established. Outright prohibition hinders possible medical research and use. Thus such a prohibition may not be "for the good of the masses," if they are losing out on effective treatments. The drugs mentioned here (cannabis, salvia, LSD, even MDMA) have also not shown to be significantly harmful/addicting when used in moderation. Lastly, a free society should also encourage freedom of thought. well you've failed to read now havn't you. Nowhere have i said i support outright banning of everything stop labeling me up to that so you can recycle the same points. If the drugs is under medical and very guided conditions does it fall into the grounds of being lifethreating? no. Or are you saying that even medical drugs have worse health effects? If they break my conditions they don't then follow the ruling. If something is not harmful in morderation or addiction it is not in the groups of drugs i am talking about. @the age comment lol. :lol:

Care to elaborate as to why they're bad/unhelpful? Personally I love the art that is inspired from drug use and have found recreational drugs to be quite helpful in expanding my mind. that was just a outlining statement see my previous post for most of the details I don't thnk the massess should be hurting themselves with harmful drugs drugs that can control there lives. Such drugs should be banned for the good of the massess. As for the work done for the legal drugs. I know that alot of such drug were legal before WW1 and you could buy a hamper that included heroin and crack and coke caontain real coke. This was a period that produces some amazing archutecture and literature soposidly (can't name any off hand) it just eneded with the first world war. The worlds of then and now are very different and i don't think parallels can be drawn and the goverments also don't want it as it would make the country look like a bunch of crackhead on the wrld stage.

why how old do i come across? Yer i seem to have contradicted myself to clear up medically nothing wrong with drugs for recreational use = bad and unhelpful

funny video =D> havn't played TF2 in a while. Used to use loads of my free time but now it takes none as i got back into RS it seems lol

My 'tangent' was a direct response to your claim that these drugs are not useful to society. care to quote me on that? because i didn't say that. Also don't musquote as when we are alking about drugs mainstream we mean the ilegal ones generally. @the medical use Yes i know some drugs have uses in some desease but thats not everybody now is it? You have presciptions for these things and don't need to make it super legal to be good.

if the glass gets lodged it will cut your intensitines up or some internal organ. I recomend the docters for this reason. I dobut your stomach is tough enough to digest it. This asumes the glass had a sharp side and was biggier than say your thumb nail. overall a very stupid thing to do.

you could have a communist state with free spech. you can obviouslt have a facist demoncasy but the truth is that complete communism (full left) and facism (full right) don't work. Facism ends up with destroyed markets without degulation e.g starbuck and the coffee market. And communism always falls as people are rewarded for there actions normally. If you work hard and your partner doesn't you get the same pay. Which is why neither two exists in a pure state.

I would say it's very difficult to discuss bans/restrictions on drugs without first knowing a good deal about the drugs, wouldn't you agree? just because i prefer to talk about 2^2 than 2 doesn't mean i have no understanding of basic numbers.

All i saw was LSd is like Salvia in the open sentense so made a possible sillygism. I cam here more interested to dicuss bans and legalisation of drugs. So we shoudl legalise everythign because they is a chance of a few exceptions? Most drugs we are talking about here are addictive. People can still be dependant of LSD for mentally if you could source your info that would be great. The thoery says it will reduce but if that happens is what this debate is about. I favour prohibition on dangerious drugs as there will always be mindless young thickess you want the stuff. you have gone off on a tangent nobody is arguing here. I am not saying medical drugs in any way and you are misguided is you think E has medical benifits. Such painkillier like morfine which come from heroin is good. I am not arguing that at all and research of the like doesn't stop. And just because some form is good doesn't mean all its brother and sisters are going to be too. You are setting yourself really low targets if you want to be a prostitite. I would like no more debate on this or we will end up going off topic. Having such a carear doesn't further humanity offer hope to kids. Sexual immortality is wrong and if its respected and considered a great job in some societes i don't respect those socities. I am not going to reply directly but.... I can turn every single own of your aguments onto other matters. This is how shallow your agruement is. I know reading it should satrical but come to drug related problems.

How can you have an IQ of 146 and not realise many people will NOT vote for Obama because he's black? yes i know that but a larger (in my view) percentage have a immediate liken to him because he is black.