darthnixon16

you learn 2 tlk g00d leiks wot i's do! Only improvements i see are a interesting and understanding of a model econemy effectilly. I seem to have better confidience some how #-o . No idea how that works and incredible patients (woo 94 rc) and fast typing skills. On a side note playing RS saved me money in real life due to not needing to buy a new 360 game or the like every few months.

what makes pvp interesting is ko thats you work for and got. Veng does that in sytle. even the DDS you had to switch to so if you didn't expect that good hit you missed you spec chance. Magic is underpowered and i have 94 magic before anybody asks. Its very easy to beat with hide and godsword. You will be hit 30s alot and you have to take a few hits to even attempt the barrage. Blitz now doesn't stall now because blitz+AGS spec can ko anybody in no matter what armour they have alot. Range is fun and pretty balanced these days. As much as a great dark bow spec is murder they never hit it and its safely slow. I used to own a AGS agreed thats it truely overpowered in PVP and vs monsters to be fair. I would just camp in matches till the person got 20ish hp which is certain in matches if you hit a non spec 50 or combo around 30-40. These then gives you a spec at about 40ish which is extremly common. I think Jagex should nerf their gear and boast others. They need to put more skill into the PVP ultimatey.

americans voted simply. Obama. Black. america look good if he gets anywhere. McCain. Old. Palin. she so dum...... From what i read over the net and talking in UK most most people are clueless on Obamas polices just just wanted "that black guy". For my opinion the word "change" needs to be taxed it was so overdone that it was better than a advertising campain. You have people who have no idea how Obama plans to change things just that he wants to in some shape or form.

lol my Obamas grans age McCain still got another 10 years :shock: he could serve another two tersm with that. I thinks its not "real" news but it for one shows the whole granma insident wasn't overplayed. And Obama will get simplathy votes.....

no unless you start saying whites have supreme God given good looks or something. Even if it is racist you are not alone by a long shot. I read a research topic on dating sites and people go for there own ethic cleaily most often.

Many of these drugs have medical potential, as we have already established. Outright prohibition hinders possible medical research and use. Thus such a prohibition may not be "for the good of the masses," if they are losing out on effective treatments. The drugs mentioned here (cannabis, salvia, LSD, even MDMA) have also not shown to be significantly harmful/addicting when used in moderation. Lastly, a free society should also encourage freedom of thought. well you've failed to read now havn't you. Nowhere have i said i support outright banning of everything stop labeling me up to that so you can recycle the same points. If the drugs is under medical and very guided conditions does it fall into the grounds of being lifethreating? no. Or are you saying that even medical drugs have worse health effects? If they break my conditions they don't then follow the ruling. If something is not harmful in morderation or addiction it is not in the groups of drugs i am talking about. @the age comment lol. :lol:

Care to elaborate as to why they're bad/unhelpful? Personally I love the art that is inspired from drug use and have found recreational drugs to be quite helpful in expanding my mind. that was just a outlining statement see my previous post for most of the details I don't thnk the massess should be hurting themselves with harmful drugs drugs that can control there lives. Such drugs should be banned for the good of the massess. As for the work done for the legal drugs. I know that alot of such drug were legal before WW1 and you could buy a hamper that included heroin and crack and coke caontain real coke. This was a period that produces some amazing archutecture and literature soposidly (can't name any off hand) it just eneded with the first world war. The worlds of then and now are very different and i don't think parallels can be drawn and the goverments also don't want it as it would make the country look like a bunch of crackhead on the wrld stage.

why how old do i come across? Yer i seem to have contradicted myself to clear up medically nothing wrong with drugs for recreational use = bad and unhelpful

funny video =D> havn't played TF2 in a while. Used to use loads of my free time but now it takes none as i got back into RS it seems lol

My 'tangent' was a direct response to your claim that these drugs are not useful to society. care to quote me on that? because i didn't say that. Also don't musquote as when we are alking about drugs mainstream we mean the ilegal ones generally. @the medical use Yes i know some drugs have uses in some desease but thats not everybody now is it? You have presciptions for these things and don't need to make it super legal to be good.

if the glass gets lodged it will cut your intensitines up or some internal organ. I recomend the docters for this reason. I dobut your stomach is tough enough to digest it. This asumes the glass had a sharp side and was biggier than say your thumb nail. overall a very stupid thing to do.

you could have a communist state with free spech. you can obviouslt have a facist demoncasy but the truth is that complete communism (full left) and facism (full right) don't work. Facism ends up with destroyed markets without degulation e.g starbuck and the coffee market. And communism always falls as people are rewarded for there actions normally. If you work hard and your partner doesn't you get the same pay. Which is why neither two exists in a pure state.

I would say it's very difficult to discuss bans/restrictions on drugs without first knowing a good deal about the drugs, wouldn't you agree? just because i prefer to talk about 2^2 than 2 doesn't mean i have no understanding of basic numbers.

All i saw was LSd is like Salvia in the open sentense so made a possible sillygism. I cam here more interested to dicuss bans and legalisation of drugs. So we shoudl legalise everythign because they is a chance of a few exceptions? Most drugs we are talking about here are addictive. People can still be dependant of LSD for mentally if you could source your info that would be great. The thoery says it will reduce but if that happens is what this debate is about. I favour prohibition on dangerious drugs as there will always be mindless young thickess you want the stuff. you have gone off on a tangent nobody is arguing here. I am not saying medical drugs in any way and you are misguided is you think E has medical benifits. Such painkillier like morfine which come from heroin is good. I am not arguing that at all and research of the like doesn't stop. And just because some form is good doesn't mean all its brother and sisters are going to be too. You are setting yourself really low targets if you want to be a prostitite. I would like no more debate on this or we will end up going off topic. Having such a carear doesn't further humanity offer hope to kids. Sexual immortality is wrong and if its respected and considered a great job in some societes i don't respect those socities. I am not going to reply directly but.... I can turn every single own of your aguments onto other matters. This is how shallow your agruement is. I know reading it should satrical but come to drug related problems.

How can you have an IQ of 146 and not realise many people will NOT vote for Obama because he's black? yes i know that but a larger (in my view) percentage have a immediate liken to him because he is black.

If Salvia = LSD LSD = Banned surely? Salvia = Banned I asumme this is something that has escaped banning due to next to no use. I think there should be hard rules on drugs and the like. Liberal thinking with drugs works when its somebody who is self controlled are involved. Throw a addict in there and you end up with problems for everybody in highier crime and mass of unpreductive kids who don't want to achieve much due to being high. As much as strict banning would make it "cool" suposidly it makes people view it as a hard line between the right and wrong. Legalising drugs expects drug use to go up and to then die down but i don't think it would be of any benifit to the massess to have items like salvia. What so nobody should every say that i shouldn't stab myself? eat so much i becoem obese? Make myself heavily mentall ill? You seem to have a very unfounded person vs state attitude. The goverment is the to help those you can't help themselves and inforce that on a neutral part. If somebodies self drug habbit leads to torrment of others, family, friends and crime victims for drg money then it is no longier the possition of the state. The people aren't happy about these crimes and little timmy taking drugs so ban the drugs that will meddle with his head. You can say this not the communitys business but when timmy degrates his adiction and seeks help it would of been cheapier for him to of not started at all. Although prostitution is unrelated i will keep it brief. It damges the areas reputation and houses prices. You don't want to bring up a family near this activity. It often leads to abuse of these women who can then find no way out of it. Also step back and think what you are agruing to legalise. Having that as a job is not moral and you should look to other ways to make money. thats a incredibily useful paradox. shame is in no shape or form does that reasoning work. I could link alchohal to drink driving to deaths to say ban the booze. If things or legalise there becomes a idea to just try one as they are just there. Think about chocolate (bad example i know) you knwo its all the same thing but you will look to try all the different sorts of ones. If that chocolate then had you eating loads of them till you died of heart attack would't you prefer the bar to be out of your reach?

Bah! so soon do liverpool top the leguse when the next week they lose and go joint top agian. Bad time to play Spurs to be honest after a new manager and they have a boast. Ifthey had played the old side they would of won no doubt. I think we can almost already count arsenal out of the title race :roll:

being under aged and a long way away from the US i have no power over the electon but it has still gotten people here interested and its rather disterbing what people would look to vote on. everybody just want Obama so they can tick off black president of a imagnary tick list almost. the guy speaks well but nobody could tell me much about what he wants to do just he sounds good doing it. McCain is perseved as old which seems to be holding a disadvantage compared Obama who seems to get black voters just because hes black. This is just a tiny sample of people who are ingnorant of politics but is this represented in the american community? Wow I'd love to see McCain actually try to use that argument, lol. Firstly, you're assuming McCain and Bush would've differed on 2 of every 5 (or any minority) issues per bill. With McCain backing Bush 9 out of every 10 votes, you can be quite sure that's it's not just a coincidence that they voted so closely. Secondly, not only would he immediately be laughed at, it could then be said that anyone's past voting record doesn't mean much of anything. "Oh I only voted for the bailout bill because it would give wooden arrows a tax exemption" Republicans couldn't claim Obama is a radical liberal anymore because he could use the same excuse you're trying and say he only agreed with 51% of the bills he voted for. Well, here's the thing, Bush and McCain are both Republican, So, naturally, they would agree on some or most stuff right? But, that doesn't mean they have the exact same policies. "That's not what the commercials say!" I think the statistic 9/10 is misleading from what i can gather. As a vote over to invade iraq will count the same weight as minor issue. What McCain means by they are different is that on the big issues like say energy and forgein policey they are different. This also doesn't mean mean that on everything in those issues they disagree.

rune skirts and legs are now the same due to pvp worlds but price demands doesn't means RS is sexist. It means the RS community has a heavy gender skew. There are less girls so demand for the skirt prices go down. I know its only pixcels but you still want you little person to look cool which is why phats are pricey and skillcape in demand for that matter.

the amount of time needed makes them speial. the 99s havn't become easier to get, people just are better at skilling these days so knwo cooking, fletch and pssibly fm are very easy to get.

You miss the point pretty badily. Company don't cut jobs to lose money they do it if pulling it will be cheapier than paying them there years work in the future. If servers are under contract that almost always means a fixed rate so they can only change when the contract up so i was right Jagex can then move servers. Being a incovence is irelivent. If it means Jagex staying in business they will do it. Its like describing dodging bullet a hassile. I never said to fire people for the fun of it which your are making out. Before you come back make you you understand business.

polynomial

100% agree. People for Millennia havn't got the answer so i don't see why a few people talking about the divine for a few minites over the internet would make any difference.

being around 70 range and low hp it would be a waste. i don't know if its just me but this artical seemed to lack purpose? I mean yes ok nice story as we reminise about those newbie days. overall nice little story =D>

in f2p safing is pathetic on the whole. Its when you reach a close barrier of 20-31ish hp where is people are safing gets interesting. In P2p as a pkier who can use veng and has a AGS i can tell you its no where belond me to ko people eating at 60ish whiach is about 2/3 hp. The main point is a 40 whip recoil by veng is 30 plus say a 40 of your own is 70 puts people very quickly in the red zone. In these kinds of fights its very interesting as is death at many moment. Here safing is a tactic as safe too much and you you will be unable to ko, safe to little and you will be ko'd.Which just a dds to hand and no veng safing becomes a issue. while people can hit 60s its very unlikely to get a ko. In short, safing is a tactic if you have the hp to do high hp kos or to make you you don't die. Its noobish when the people end up eating so fast they run without any chance of KO for the oponent.