Speedyshel

Haha I agree that's amazing indeed lol. Ok I'll take the lvl 80 for black bolts off my lists =)

Worked fine for me.

I don't think it was a typo. Black bolts can't hit 29 (at level 80) when rune bolts hit 28 (at level 95). I think it was correct before the "typo." Just to reiterate in case, max hits must be achieved without prayers/potions and rapid style. I agree that combining the two bolts is going to get confusing lol. FOR RUNITE BOLTS: 61 - 19 by zichu0 62 - 20 by zichu0 73 - 23 by NanasRevenge 74 - 23 by SportsGuy 75 - 23 by SportsGuy 77 - 24 by Me Llamo 78 - 24 by SportsGuy 79 - 24 by SportsGuy 80 - 25 by SportsGuy 89 - 27 (previous list) 93 - 28 by psyc0mage 95 - 28 by Milo88 96 - 29 by yorickw 97 - 29 by yorickw 99 - 30 by Nyosuht FOR BLACK BOLTS: 78 - 19 by SportsGuy 79 - 19 by SportsGuy

Congratulations, N_Odie !! Well deserved :) \

The prayer division of the calculator has an error in it somewhere. There's a certain range of the prayer exp that when it reads you need up to about 600k exp to reach your goal it says I need 0 more points. For example, when entering I have 11m current prayer exp and need to reach 11.6m exp, it gives me 0. :ohnoes: Might need a little doctoring hehe. http://www.tip.it/runescape/index.php?page=pest_control_calculator.htm

Should be its, me thinks. Right on! Can also change "However, this will restore less energy then the Spirit Terrorbird" to "than the Spirit Terrorbird." I think the it's/its is right either way. Because from one angle the scrolls are not owned by the bull ant so it is its. But on the other hand it still makes sense that the scroll exclusively used by the bull ant is some what possessive to it making it it's its would be more conformist and traditional, but it's is not grammatically incorrect either. I know this isn't a forum for discussion, but it's is technically "it is" so "Bull Ant combined with it is Unburden scroll" wouldn't be right. Juhniz is right. Anyways, just thought I'd share. I'm done :)

Should be its, me thinks. Right on! Can also change "However, this will restore less energy then the Spirit Terrorbird" to "than the Spirit Terrorbird."

Just a recap, so far FOR RUNE BOLTS we have: 61 - 19 by zichu0 62 - 20 by zichu0 73 - 23 by NanasRevenge 74 - 23 by SportsGuy 75 - 23 by SportsGuy 77 - 24 by Me Llamo 78 - 24 by SportsGuy 89 - 27 (previous list) 93 - 28 by psyc0mage 96 - 29 by yorickw 97 - 29 by yorickw 99 - 30 by Nyosuht Edits: added new max hits

[hide=Done thanks ~Cowman]In the Combat Guide under the "special attacks" link there a repetition for the Excalibur Enhanced weapon. It states the special: "...hitpoints restored over over a brief time period." Over is mentioned twice. =P[/hide]

Hi there, In step 16 of The Dig Site guide (http://www.tip.it/runescape/index.php?rs2quest_id=19) it states the explosive "WILL kill you" or hit you hard. Jagex recently updated these sorts of items to where they cannot kill you any more (http://news.runescape.com/newsitem.ws?id=1795&dir=n at the bottom). Happy Scapin' =)

That's great, Congrats on that! Not sure it's possible to check the exact number of kills, but if anyone does know if there's a way to do that, help is appreciated here :D

You could check if you wanted to. Once you advance a ranking, count count and count your kills until the next ranking and use that to check the gap between levels and that'll tell you which set of data is correct. Because the two sets of data have very different gaps between rankings. :ohnoes: However, Runescape has a page that shows the rankings and the number of kills required if you want to check that out. I'm sure their data is correct, but for personal satisfaction, you could count. :D The link is in my first post.

DiscoDude, I understand you could have done it with the help of a few friends, I had already formulated a formula that fits this data, but not sure the crew has gotten around to using it and the data yet. Be interesting to see what your formula looks like compared to mine. \ Thanks for the data though, it's a tremendous help and I'm sure the crew will get around to this when they have time. Happy Scapin'

Not an error, just a different approach to the calculation. The reason it doesn't bring up the items is because the calculator details how much XP you get per bar of that particular material "smithed" instead of per item. For instance, if you smith a platebody (using 5 bars) it will be five times the amount of XP for that particular metal type. So the calculator is used more to calculate target number of bars for a certain level rather than target number of specific items.

90 < Insert witty comment here. >

66

When gathering the items, the "bonuses" are calculated based on the final amount gathered. So even if rating was not kept or different amounts of supplies were collected each day, the "bonus" items would be calculated based upon amounts at the time of collection. So at 1 gem per 150 coal, even 449 coal would result in only 2 gems at collection (according to current calculations). Hopefully I'm not repeating something that's already been said. If so, hopefully the screen I attach can be of some possible use. [hide=][/hide] 4,534 tuna with 83 specials. 18,365 maples with 183 nests (correct). --------------------------------------------------------------- Yes, from the pictures Pokemama posted and a few others that I looked at, it seems coal is 1 gem per 200 coal and tuna I'm not so sure about. 3,236 coal / 16 gems = 200 coal per gem 3,926 tuna / 76 specials = 52 tuna per special. And my previous post showed 55 tuna per post, so I'm not sure about tuna and the specials, but coal seems to definitely be 200 coal per gem. Anyways, it's late and hopefully this makes some sense. :thumbsup:

.. :thumbup: .. :thumbup: :thumbup: .. .. :thumbup: .. .. :thumbup: .. :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

I'm an avid impling hunter (d imps ftw) and can't say I've ever gotten that loot. Won't dispute it, but I'll be sure to screenie if I do get some. Will post regarding this if something changes.

Well if we didn't post here, what else would you do? J/k hehe :mrgreen: 3! for the 1,294,293rd time

23

63 and a good night to all.

6-T-1 61

Fif-tee-nyn

Beautiful Indeed! Fifty Four, sadly my last post for the night. Night night ! :mrgreen: So...54...