AgingMiser

I assume you want to share it without letting anyone change it. Just share the document and restrict permissions when you share it, then give people the link. No offense, but I don't think what Morionic said would work. Use a string comparison command for that; it's in GDocs help somewhere.

If I knew what to write the script in (whatever runs a macro would probably do, but I don't know that), I could easily set up a loop that took an input, searched for said input and returned the object #. Essentially, it would look something like this. The most tedious part would be setting up a method to produce the URL (easy if done by hand, but you have to go through multiple strings before you can convert an item name to a search query URL) - unless, of course, the macro could just go and search a string. After that, the code would identify the link and copy the URL, then reverse the first method to isolate the item number. Would probably take me a couple hours to be honest, simply because of the tedious nature of the necessary work.

Funny, I myself used to wonder about this. Unfortunately, Google Docs is incapable of returning a URL; consequently, it can't be used to determine object numbers to my knowledge. However, it should be possible to write a script, in which you input the item's exact name, and then returns the object number.

It could just be because I don't have access to edit your spreadsheet, but it looks like you just typed the prices in instead of putting in the code thing, You're right, he didn't type any data retrieval formulas in; you could've confirmed it by going to formula view.

Thanks :D

Bump. :x

Again, this.

Reading your first two sentences, I thought you were opening with a troll. Then reading on I realized you were serious. I'm sorry, but I now believe you're blind. OnT: Welcome to 'scape. It's the truth.

No food is just luck ???? dude yeh sure i got lucky like 10 times in a row because i wasnt safing....doesnt that make sense.... think before you post "i got lucky like 10 times in a row" Yeah, I believe you. "i wasnt safing" There's no food. How the heck is safing possible. Why don't you try thinking first? Which is exactly why Woofius needs to go PvP.

You choose to ignore them, so you don't actually need a different world to do this. You talk as if other players are such an inconvenience to you as if its only you that matters or exists. Oh and the ad-hominem thing has been done before by players who don't like me challenging their arsey attitude. If you don't like it, don't post. Other players have every right to ask questions. You have every right to ignore them. Now get over yourself Your argument implies that someone who doesn't appreciate questions is therefore an idiot with delusions of grandeur. "Other players have every right to ask questions. You have every right to ignore them. Now get over yourself." I wonder if you actually read his posts, because he's simply stating his own opinion. It's a sorry truth, but at a minimum, half of 'scape players likely have a double digit iq - and that's assuming that they have brains and not just a lump of [cabbage] in their skulls. Consequently, the questions they ask, one in ten of which is "?????????????????????????????????????[...]???????????" are generally an inconvenience because they aren't questions. It's spam that's technically a question. Although a legitimate question, such as "What's the xp rate doing so and so to train this skill?" is in my opinion nothing to ignore, because it's sensible. I can also understand a lv5 asking how to make money, but someone simply begging their way through to start an account? To quote Sonic, they're being Lachtophers. And how exactly are 1000+ total worlds a means of ignoring requests for help from other players? They're simply another high-level feature for players. Perhaps they do isolate some sects of the community, and perhaps they do encourage elitism to some extent, but for those people that say "1 h4v3 99 c00k r0f1 n00b i 0wn u" wouldn't people relatively new to the game be much better off unexposed to these people? The question was "What's your opinion of 1000+ total worlds?" You've veered off on a tangent that you're unable to connect to the actual question. And again, my personal opinion is that the point of 1000+ total is to be a high level requirement. 1000+ total is a joke in p2p; hence, it should be some sort of total xp requirement. I see far too many people that brag about having 1200 total and then have an amazing 7 digit total xp.

[troll]D00d 1t c4ll3d 99 str 0wn4g3[/troll] But seriously. What I find stupid about this thread is that people claim that def > str. Hell, one guy even posted a no food DA vid of him fighting 99 strs. No food is pure luck, so that's just plain pathetic. Str may be overrated, but last I checked 1 str doesn't hit 20s. 'sides, there's a reason range tanks are considered the best type of p2p pk build.

I think you should put several hide categories inside the mining for profit one, to make browsing more efficient. Scrolling through that entire thing isn't very pleasant when you want to find something, no offense :| Still awesome stuff though :) Already has the makings of another AoW.

You're insane and absurdly lucky. But we all love you <3 I stared at the last pk. Seren, Arma, and Zammy stat, not to mention the fm brawlers and about 500k in other stuff...

Took darn long enough.

You're crazy.