Lukeeeeee

the hp members took themselves off their ml for the time they are in our clan. issue solved. =D> :thumbsup: gratz on the win tk anyway

so are we all :lol: 8-)

can we keep it on topic plz? gf again lgz :thumbsup:

gf lgz was very fun war after all the hype beforehand some of my pics gf again :thumbsup: \ EDIT: sorry they arent in order they got changed order when uploaded :?

Gen when rune posted that on the site it was to immediate effect not after a few last posts. gf dh

:lol:

added on to what am8 said: both bk and tk are top clans and we knew it would be a difficult challenge but we can keep our heads high even if we did lose by big margins gf again

gratz cr =D> better luck next time lgz :thumbup: psst its note rune not "not" :?

gratz on the win. you totally blew us away =D> gf bk

gf tk we coulda done better anyways gj on the win =D>

Goog job se. was there and dk almost piled us >.> didnt realise u had 3 at once makes it even better :D =D> :thumbsup:

gf dh. hopefully we will do better next time :thumbup:

gj df :) gf pf was fun 8-) :thumbsup: \

the bind was only the start of a pile that wasn't meant to happen. lower opts are meant to attack but before df got the chance one person had been ko'ed. df wouldn't deliberatly stall any war and it would have been unfair to those who were still warring hp to miss out on the next war.

Goes back to my posts, leniency. If lgz acted the way df did, we would of simply spammed 'DQed' when you came 45 minutes late. But we didn't, in fact, we warred, and were lenient for you to bend the minor time rule, even though it cost us 6 men. Yet when you warred you didn't offer that sort of leniency. And when we asked for a rematch, you still didn't offer that sort of leniency. Indeed it is our fault for being lenient and considerate for your lateness, it is a tad shame you didn't offer the same. Nonetheless its evident which clan came to war and which one came for the points, simply because of this: we were lenient the first time it came to this war as we nulled the result even after u were dq'ed and uff said ok to a rm. the leniency came the first time and if you keep expecting it while breaking rules you are going to get nowhere. the lateness was due to a war (already explained approx 10 times) and u cannot blame unexpected circumstances on why you dqed yet again

Hmm, if you took some time to read the first post instead of talking blindly you might just of avoided your situation.. We had 70 men at the scheduled time, your elite time skills led to some of our guys losing patience, so after 45 minutes we dropped to 62. Oi? You disagreed with 'minor' rules earlier, and now you agree. I find it funny that you label your 45 minutes late issue a minor problem. But when we make an issue you make it a big problem. by the minor issues i meant by getting people into dd's etc i wasnt referring to time issues as i said the wait was unavoidable due to a war that was nearing its end

uhh just for ur info it was amateurnoob who got the message (page 2 on this thread he states it) :

also one thing about what inf said earlier: DF wants wars that both clans respect and show their honour when warring. some of this topic may show people without honour/respect for others which we in df keep as a high priority

If the way you are thinking is put into play, then this war is null since both clans exchanged flames? You were also 45 minutes late, this happened before the flames, so shouldn't you be 'DQed'? But of course, that happens in majority of full outs, your always gonna have a few bad apples or a bad time, does that mean the whole war is off. No, there is leniency towards such things unless they go out of hand or are done intentionally by the entire clan. This leniency was what we had done when we saw you were still in a war with HP. So technically from your perspective you are already 'DQed' even before the war since you came 45 minutes late from the scheduled time. Yet again, I hit at my main point, we are a warring clan, note the word war. And not 'that rule is broken, war is off!'. notice that we were already in a war and had to finish this before our next war started. the wait was unavoidable. ok sure there is always going to be minor little problems to sort out but that doesnt explain why you didnt dd and attacked first.

if these "minor" rules were not broken then we wouldnt have this problem. this was your chance at a rematch seeings originally you broke these "minor" rules then too. if these rules arent to be followed then why bother warring if you know it is going to happen. we dont need excuses to win wars and also what you are saying seems to point towards you ignoring rules if they are "minor". this is the 2nd time it has happened and you cant blame df for being fed up of dq's

So, we have to say 'Don't be 45 minutes late' next time when declaring a war? Hmm, also throw in, 'Don't forget common sense to the war'. Its clear, even after the first match, they refused to rematch. I don't know about any other clans here, but TWR has been about warring clans, and whether your gonna teeter about 1 minute late or 1 bind thrown, lets get real here, WOULD that REALLY affect the match SO MUCH to give you the edge of winning the war? Obviously df leaving and refusing to rm, means they didn't really come to war but came to evade the war and get an excuse to win. Lgz stayed 45 minutes to war df, df sees a bind and they leave. Kinda defeats the purpose of the word WAR in TWR? I'd understand if this was a close matched opt war, but lets get real here, this is the 2nd time we war, and its the 2nd time you are defeated. actually if you read the rules (link is on another page) you will see the higher opts dd (lgz didnt do) and lower opts att (lgz did when higher opts). tbh there are no grounds for you to try and complain when you accepted to wait while df were warring. it is not a defeat if the other clan breaks rules

the lateness couldnt be avoided and if you read the whole topic it was accepted. also it was suggested by a twr mod that df walk out if it happened, which they did

tbh if you look at the vid in motion you see the bind but you see uff already stalled by binds at the same time. either way u cant tell which were thrown first as this is a screenie it doesnt show. in the vid at this time you see uff stopped by binds

could you explain this more? thxs also it sort of doesnt make sense :?: