Riku3220

Only 67 (68 now)? I've really got to step up my games. Let's see... Stupid projects for school annoy me. I'm suppose to making a "montage" for Spanish class. She really expects people to get a bunch of stuff and put them together in an "artistic" fashion. I'm just going to make a Powerpoint....

Zynga games is as casual as you can get. Farmville is like Runescape, except the only skill is farming and you can't do anything with the crops.

True. The main problem for me was grammar and spelling. Had I bothered to use some sort of spell check, capitalization, and punctuation my posts would have been bearable to read.

http://forum.tip.it/topic/37171-humanare-we-really-the-most-advaced-race-on-earth/page__hl__riku3220 I really dislike my 11 year old self. How was I not banned under the pretense of trolling? Seriously, how did you all put up with me?

If that's not arguing in favor of a pedophile than I don't know what is. BTW adding a "definitely creepy" disclaimer at the end dosn't change the rest of the post. At best, it's CYA. I will also point out that tripsis is part of the tip.it admin team and as such IS a Mod. That isn't arguing in favor of the man, she's saying that the girl isn't a victim. Unfortunately, these morons would rather pretend that it's the child or her parent(s) to blame -- because in the end, they feel safer because they think they're intelligent enough not to fall for the pedophile's wiles. Perhaps they are, but not EVERY child is so "brilliant" or well protected. What these people fail to understand, Lux, is that we're dealing not with some simple-minded child or inattentive parents here -- but rather a predator who preys upon children. If it had not been THIS child, then it would have been SOME OTHER child, who's situation was as nearly or more vulnerable than the one in question. It's merely THAT base and simple. A pedophile is a predator. They don't simply stop being a pedophile because some one child outsmarted them. The problem is that, these morons are far to thick to get the idea through their thick heads that you cannot "troll" in favour of pedophilia and come out "looking cool" ... Not to anyone with any sense of decency, anyways. You have got to be kidding me. WE ALL KNOW THAT THE MAN IS A PEDOPHILE AND SHOULD BE PUNISHED. What we're saying is the girl was not some helpless victim who made a mistake. She clearly knew what was going on with the situation. She clearly wanted the relationship to keep going if she WILLINGLY had sex with the man more than once and continued to contact him by cell phone. She clearly knew that this was something she shouldn't be doing because she was keeping her phone a secret from her mother. Nobody here is arguing in favor of pedophilia, but you people are making the girl seem like a victim when she clearly wasn't.

I must say, quite bluntly, that some of the reactions on this thread chillingly resembles the reactions of a condecending group of religious nuts after getting a fresh wiff of Jesus Juice; "doesn't matter that humans are evolving as a culture and biologically...she is 13 and is still a child. - This has happened thousands of times in America, and everytime the young 'innocent" girl si the one that gets sex or flirted with while the older men have a good time. Are you guys certain you want to adopt this attitude? Then I don't pray because it doesn't really do anything. I can't imagine the lack of accommodation skills that praying shows in a person. I am appalled. [100% honesty if this chick were my sister, I'd be more pissed at her for being [developmentally delayed]ed than him for being creepy] Really? Suppose the guy wanted more than sex. He could have easily killed him, his sister, and the rest of his family. Or raped them all. Or robbed them. Or all 3 if he felt like it. And that's where complete speculation comes in. True. But would you at least say it was her fault if something had happened to her mother?

Excuse me, I need to go find the nearest infant and pummel them repeatedly with my fist. >.< (It's ironic also because someday this will be me. [bleep].) To be fair, nobody learned about Budapest in the 3rd [bleep]ing grade. Everything in 3rd grade was extremely watered down American History, and by that I mean horribly biased and distorted stories of George Washington and the American Revolution and Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War. Mix in some Pilgrims and Indians in November and you've got yourself a 3rd grade history curriculum.

Well we all knew MW3 would have to come out some time. The campaign left a huge cliffhanger after you kill Shepard.

I don't think we used WWI yet, but trench warfare isn't very fun.

I must say, quite bluntly, that some of the reactions on this thread chillingly resembles the reactions of a condecending group of religious nuts after getting a fresh wiff of Jesus Juice; "doesn't matter that humans are evolving as a culture and biologically...she is 13 and is still a child. - This has happened thousands of times in America, and everytime the young 'innocent" girl si the one that gets sex or flirted with while the older men have a good time. Are you guys certain you want to adopt this attitude? Then I don't pray because it doesn't really do anything. I can't imagine the lack of accommodation skills that praying shows in a person. I am appalled. [100% honesty if this chick were my sister, I'd be more pissed at her for being [developmentally delayed]ed than him for being creepy] Really? Suppose the guy wanted more than sex. He could have easily killed him, his sister, and the rest of his family. Or raped them all. Or robbed them. Or all 3 if he felt like it.

You've got to have a backup plan in case somebody has basic knowledge of the world. You should ask about the most recent war said country was in.

I couldn't name a capital of a province in Canada either, but I dont live there. The only one I know is Edmonton of Alberta. I can name a few provinces though. Can Canadians name all 50 states? It's fine if you can't because most Americans can't name 10. I'm pretty sure I can :P Let's see (I won't google till I have to) [hide] Arkansas Alabama Texas New Mexico Rhode Island Georgia South Dakota North Dakota Illinios Michigan New York Washington Washington DC Massechusets(sp?) California Nevada Colorado Oregon Ohio Indiana Virginia West Virginia Hawaii Alaska Florida Tennessee new jersey Nebraska Wyoming Louisiana Arizona Utah Conneticut North Carolina South Carolina Minnesota California Wisconsin Delaware [/hide] Well I didn't google for any of that, not bad...can't believe I forgot so many though lol, they're probably really obvious ones too. Nice, you only missed Oklahoma, Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Kansas, Missouri, Maryland, Utah, Mississippi, Idaho, and Pennsylvania.

I couldn't name a capital of a province in Canada either, but I dont live there. The only one I know is Edmonton of Alberta. I can name a few provinces though. Can Canadians name all 50 states? It's fine if you can't because most Americans can't name 10.

A 13 year old has no critical thinking skills. A 13 year old cannot be held accountable or blameworthy for being raped. Remember what you said in this topic, and a few years from now you're going to realize how ridiculous you sound No, a 5 year old has no critical thinking skills. A 13 year old, hell, even some 10 year olds are capable of critical thinking. Maybe not at the same level as a fully grown adult, but enough to be able to think for themselves. It's like the Senior-Freshman mentality that high school kids get. Hitting a certain age does not make you automatically more mature and capable than everyone who is younger. FYI, critical thinking usually doesn't start developing until closer to 20. Just thought you should know that.

The thing that I hate is when drivers seem to think that 35 is the universal speed limit. How are you zooming out of my sight when we're leaving the neighborhood but then I see you crawling when the speed limit is 50?

A 13 year old has no critical thinking skills. A 13 year old cannot be held accountable or blameworthy for being raped. Remember what you said in this topic, and a few years from now you're going to realize how ridiculous you sound No, a 5 year old has no critical thinking skills. A 13 year old, hell, even some 10 year olds are capable of critical thinking. Maybe not at the same level as a fully grown adult, but enough to be able to think for themselves. It's like the Senior-Freshman mentality that high school kids get. Hitting a certain age does not make you automatically more mature and capable than everyone who is younger.

No, both parties aren't at fault. One is a pedophile who preys on children and the other is a child. And yes, you are in highschool, you are 16, 3 years difference from the girl and you think that you would have been smarter than that at 13. You aren't old enough yet to realize how god damn stupid you were at 13. e: and yes, what you are saying is 100% indisputably Just World The other is a child that gave him all of the information that the pedophile needed to go about his business, and then continue to allow it to happen. You seem to think that every 13 year old is braindead. I may not have been as smart and mature as I thought I was but I knew damn well not to give out my personal information to people over the Internet.

No, I'm not putting words into your mouth. You are doing a good enough job without me needing to. Yes you are. Please tell me where I ever said that women who dress provacatively want to be raped? Wearing sexy clothes and telling a 54 year old man where you live are 2 very different things. That doesn't mean that she wanted it or it was her fault. Whether or not she wanted it, it was very much her fault. I really can't see why you're denying this. Just World. You are trying to rationalize what happened by blaming the victim and trying to make up ways the victim was to blame because you don't want to think it could happen to you and believe that the world is just. Just like when people say the [bleep] deserved it. Or if someone went to buy something from someone off craigslist and went to their house and got murdered, it would be their fault. To the second part, I can't understand how you are arguing that a child is responsible for getting raped. Maybe it's because you're still in highschool I never said the situation wasn't wrong. I'm saying it's the girl's fault as well as the man's. I'm also not trying to "make up" ways to blame the "victim" because she clearly made herself the victim. Both parties are at fault. The girl for giving out her information and continuing to contact the man without telling authorities and the man for going through with it all. But of course, my opinion on the matter is obviously invalid because I'm in high school and of course that means I'm incapable of making rational decisions despite being able to drive and maintain a job, right?

No, I'm not putting words into your mouth. You are doing a good enough job without me needing to. Yes you are. Please tell me where I ever said that women who dress provacatively want to be raped? Wearing sexy clothes and telling a 54 year old man where you live are 2 very different things. That doesn't mean that she wanted it or it was her fault. Whether or not she wanted it, it was very much her fault. I really can't see why you're denying this.

BUT SHE WANED IT Obviously she did if she accepted a cell phone, used the cell phone to contact him, and have sex with him 3 times. If it was "such a traumatic experience" for her don't you think her mom, friends, or teachers would have noticed anything strange? Just World at it's finest folks. OBVIOUSLY that lady who got raped wanted it, why else would she dress so provocatively? I never said that. In this case it IS the girl's fault she got raped. SHE gave him her contact info. SHE accepted his cell phone. SHE continued to contact him. SHE is the one to cause all of this. SHE had the power to end it at any time. That is exactly what you did. Exactly. Also congrats on being a misogynist who supports pedophiles I never said women who dress provactively want to be raped, I said it's THIS girl's fault for getting raped. You're putting words into my mouth and then trying to take a moral high ground.

BUT SHE WANED IT Obviously she did if she accepted a cell phone, used the cell phone to contact him, and have sex with him 3 times. If it was "such a traumatic experience" for her don't you think her mom, friends, or teachers would have noticed anything strange? Just World at it's finest folks. OBVIOUSLY that lady who got raped wanted it, why else would she dress so provocatively? I never said that. In this case it IS the girl's fault she got raped. SHE gave him her contact info. SHE accepted his cell phone. SHE continued to contact him. SHE is the one to cause all of this. SHE had the power to end it at any time.

BUT SHE WANED IT Obviously she did if she accepted a cell phone, used the cell phone to contact him, and have sex with him 3 times. If it was "such a traumatic experience" for her don't you think her mom, friends, or teachers would have noticed anything strange?

[bleep]ing yes I would, without a hesitation. You are saying you wouldn't put any onus on a child who is 3 years younger, but you feel perfectly fine doing it to a 13 year old child. I'd still think the 10 year old was a [bleep]ing idiot for giving out personal information, but by 13 there is absolutely no reason why they shouldn't know how giving personal information is a bad idea. Also, how is a 17 year old any less capable of making a decision like this than any 18 year old? Age isn't some magical thing that gives you all of the answers as soon as the Earth goes around the Sun 18 times.

She is a child. She is a child. She is a child. She is not capable of thinking the same way we do, she isn't fully mentally or physically developed. Would you be saying this if she were a 10 year old? Would you? She is a child as defined by the law. A 13 year old is perfectly capable of deciding between right and wrong. Would you be saying this if she were 10? And this is a serious question, please answer Probably not. Would you be saying what you're saying if she were 16 or 17?

She is a child. She is a child. She is a child. She is not capable of thinking the same way we do, she isn't fully mentally or physically developed. Would you be saying this if she were a 10 year old? Would you? She is a child as defined by the law. A 13 year old is perfectly capable of deciding between right and wrong.