darkmage099

6.5/10 Not a fan of pixels, but I guess it's nice

Yeah, it was sort of a joke, but I am being serious. IN the time period of about 1400-1800 (?) they were pretty mean to the Africans, Asians, North Americans, and South Americans. The stories of what the Portuguese and Spanish did to the natives of America is terrifying. The French weren't so bad as they chose to coexist rather than dominate. Also, the Europeans had a "supremacy"-like mind-set where they thought they were somehow above the rest of the world (which they were but they didn't have to be so cruel!). They also introduced mass slavery based on skin color. Yeah, I know other people have been bad too, but I'm just wondering what if they had been a bit "nicer".

Why are you condemning Iran for nukes but not America? Who said they sent suicidal speed boats at military ships. Please, show me your evidence; not assumptions. Negotiate with the US. Hah, this is a discussion not a comedy club.

Do you know what implying is? It seems as though you were implying that I supported her assassination. Do you know what assuming is? no

You're right, we shouldn't voice our opinions. We shouldn't question our government and its actions. We shouldn't hold debate about what's right and what's wrong. You're right, we should all be ignorant citizens.

Do you know what implying is? It seems as though you were implying that I supported her assassination.

You're an idiot. If anyone attacked the US, it'd be with (nuclear) bombs not guns and tanks. :roll: I think you are the idiot that can't comprehend the world nuclear state. If anyone in the world would make a single nuclear attack, then the doomsday clock would be closer to midnight than it was during the Cuban missile crisis, and if you know your history, then you should know that's pretty damn close. L2 read, Malo... Skatedog is saying that America's civilian guns will defend an invasion ( :roll: ). And I'm saying that's stupid because no one will ever invade America. IF someone wanted to attack America, it would be with bombs. I dont even know what you're talking about with this nuclear state. That's completely irrelevant.

And that makes her assassination fine? Did I say it was? Just means I dont care that she died.

We'd most probably be (or have) Jewish upbringing. Many religious wars between Islam and Judaism might have occurred in the last 2000 years, there would have been no Nazi Genocide as we know it. Jews wouldn't have been secluded to commercial jobs in Europe, and thus mercantilism, capitalism and Marxism probably wouldn't have existed, so we'd probably have a completely different world economical system. Wrong, Christianity spread, not Judaism. There are far too few Jews to compete with the spread of Islam. That'd be awesome. Except for the jizya. That'd kind of suck. You know, the situation you proposed probably would have happened if it weren't for Charles "The Hammer" Martel. If he had not stopped the Muslim forces at the Battle of Tours, the Muslim armies would have taken out the weak and decentralized European kingdoms. Also, they would have encircled Byzantium and taken over all of Europe, west Asia, and Africa. However, the vikings may have proven to be trouble, but I doubt it. The importance of weather: 1. What if the Carthaginian had won the Punic Wars...you know Rome only won because of the weather. 2. What if the Mongols and Kublai Kahn's fleet would have been successful and taken over Japan? 3. What if the Spanish Armada wasn't stopped by the Protestant wind? 4. What if the Viking expeditions to the Americas would have been more successful? The climate kind of ruined it for them. Other: 1. What if Ghengis Kahn had never chased his enemies westward and discovered he controlled the silk roads. He actually didn't mean to conquer this great amount of land. He was paranoid with catching rival chiefs. The Muslim empires wouldn't have fallen (he killed 500,000 Baghdadians!), the New World wouldn't have been discovered when it was, and Europe wouldn't have made it to the top. 2. What if Europeans weren't such douches? 3. What if the Ottomans had chosen Allies instead of Axis? There would be a united Arab state and peace throughout the Middle East. They would undoubtedly be powerful because I would assume they would have taken over the oil industry. ...cant think of any other interesting ones.

She was a corrupt feudal princess. Good riddance, bitch

You're an idiot. If anyone attacked the US, it'd be with (nuclear) bombs not guns and tanks. :roll:

@Assassin You agree with the war in Afghanistan but disagree with it in Iraq. However, most of the war was fought in Iraq. How does that play out to your feelings of America. Oh and, fyi: Osama still hasn't been caught...after all this.

Iran wouldn't attack the US. I find it hard to believe the sources that say that Iran threatened to blow up US ships...Now I'm not saying they're wrong but possibly not entirely correct.

that is totally not true, and dont try to argue with me, i live in israel. i dont agree with giving back the lands, we conquered the lands in war they declared on us, we already gave them lands about 2 years ago, and now all the israelis who lived there are homeless. Not much conquering, when you roll in with massive tanks and automatic weapons, against kids with rocks and sticks and stones. Its more like baseraping in a Battlefield 2 server. u make me laugh, get ur facts right, and then talk. GTFO laser.

6.5/10....seems more like an inside joke. I'm assuming it would be funny if I got it. Also, it's cool because it goes with your sig. :)

You lost to South Carolina who didn't even make a bowl... Except that was like the second game...That counts when talking about the bowls.

Try to imagine what it would be like. You can't. Ergo, it's incomprehensible. Just because I can't "feel" nothingness, just because I can't shut down my mind at will, that doesn't mean it's impossible for me to comprehend the concept :| . Try to comprehend nothingness for eternity. It's hard for me to describe, and that's the point. Imagine being concious after death in nothingness for eternity. It's like being buried alive, but worse. There's your fear. From a scientific standpoint though you wouldn't be conscious... you'd just be gone. Yeah, but how would it feel to be "gone"? Answer: You wont feel it because you'd be gone... That's scary. It's... not existing, a lack of thought and physical state. I don't get it, what's hard to comprehend about it :| ? Well, we wouldn't know what it feels like to not have feelings. :lol:

Tickling....you tickle me, you die. I'm not joking :?

@Goddess [hide] [/hide] I'm sorry :cry: . I guess I don't know the positive qualities of him, so my opinion of him wouldn't be accurate. From the way you make it sound, he isn't very thoughtful, but like I said I dont know. @plec [hide] Yea I'm still with her. I have no idea what to do. Talking is out the window because she doesn't think she did anything wrong. She told me she wish she could take it back, but thats only because it upsets me and not because she thinks its wrong. She didn't cheat on me, but the problem is she lied to me but she doesn't think she did. Anyways. Whenever I hear the phrase "girls night out" by anyone it pisses me off and gets me in a bad mood. For the most part I try to not let it effect my relationship with my g/f. Like I said, I found out about this 9 months after it happened. But what made it worse was that a week before she was on a week long cruise and when she came back she told me that she "danced" with some boys on the cruise. I really didn't care, I was just glad that she was back because I missed her. Later I found out that "dancing" meant "grinding". Yeehaw!! I still find it hard to trust her. Even though its been 9 months since then. When ever I hear dance music I wonder if that was the song that she grinded with that boy to. Needless to say, dancing, cruises, and "girls night out" all piss me off. [/hide] That's tough to hear...I would be to spiteful and angry to continue to date her. I guess I really dont know how much you love her. Even though you forgave her, she did it again. That would definitely be the last string for me. :x . @Goddess [hide] At least he did something...although it was a feeble attempt. I cant believe he did not take the hint (of lunch)! I guess this goes to show you haven't trained him :P ! Anyway, hope all goes well... Man, it's not that easy. Some men can be clueless when it comes to this stuff. You being the Johnny Depp fan that you are...

Georgia did not win their division, let alone their conference...end of story. Even though they have a strong conference, if they're not the strongest one from it..then they don't belong there. just the luck of the draw between which conference you're from i suppose. Except for the fact that LSU and Georgia had the same records. Looking at it statistically, Georgia STILL should have gone because their losses were over 6 weeks ago whilst LSU's were fairly recent. Yeah, that's why mizzou went back. Furthermore, LSU lost to unranked teams! Georgia proved they should be there by DESTROYING Hawaii, believe me I was there. Still, we should have at least played USC or something :cry:. Oh yeah and OSU had a soft schedule... All that being said: LSU: 31 OSU: 21 Lol? From what I saw it didn't take much to DESTROY Hawaii. They were overrated and severely mismatched. Sure they went undefeated, but that just shows how weak their devisions are. And I am sorry, but with both USC and LSU loosing 2 games, the point still stands, WE LOST IN TRIPLE OVERTIME. "Omg you lost to Arkansas and Tennessee" Um, didn't both Arkansas and Tennessee go to bowls? Being the Cotton and Outback (? Not sure). USC lost to Stanford, at home, not even in overtime, it was a straight loss, then they lost to Oregon, which was also, a straight loss. And seriously, a win is a win :roll: Granted OSU has a great defense, so the game won't be a blowout. But the fact still stands, LSU has the advantage, and will win. The only way I even see OSU standing a chance is if they keep it close, and pull it into triple overtime. 24-21 -> LSU Nuff said :roll: It's not Georgia's fault BCS fu*ked up. IT just proves my point that Georgia should have at least played a stronger team than Hawaii if not go to the championship. You just said a win is a win. Therefore, a loss is a loss. You cant go saying that LSU lost in OT and consider that a valid point. IN your own words, a loss is a loss. God I wish Georgia had a shot at LSU.

I'd feel the exact same way! I'm sorry but that really sucks. What are you going to do/have already done? Are you still with her?

6/10 cats are old but still sort of funny

Georgia did not win their division, let alone their conference...end of story. Even though they have a strong conference, if they're not the strongest one from it..then they don't belong there. just the luck of the draw between which conference you're from i suppose. Except for the fact that LSU and Georgia had the same records. Looking at it statistically, Georgia STILL should have gone because their losses were over 6 weeks ago whilst LSU's were fairly recent. Yeah, that's why mizzou went back. Furthermore, LSU lost to unranked teams! Georgia proved they should be there by DESTROYING Hawaii, believe me I was there. Still, we should have at least played USC or something :cry:. Oh yeah and OSU had a soft schedule... All that being said: LSU: 31 OSU: 21

Ask them if there's a "Christopher McCuin" in their neighborhood. Then you can let out a sigh...or maybe a scream.

They never released what type of sauce :( . Me, I'd go with a spicy BBQ.