has rs2 reached it's limit?

[Michael]

ever seen a lv 86 hit 43 on a player? i dont think so.. i think im one of the few ppl whose hit 43 on a lv 92 player at 70 str.... they can make it better!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! they need to make those max hits more common... whose in??

 

 

 

Hit a 43 without Dharoks many times? I doubt you can hit about 25 without dharoks, and while Dharoks is effective when used correctly, getting to low enough hp in PVP is not really worth hitting a 40 when a simple hit off 1 or 2 would kill you.

[Gurgle554]

Mc90123, thats what i mean. they need to make it easier to hit those higher hits... dont need to lose as much health.. higher hits at lower str.... they cud do that! its all possible!, btw, how do u quote someone?

[Zepheras]

Obviously they will hit a limit, when they introduce weapons and armours with 90+ att/range/mage level requirement. That's when they can't do anymore add on, only introducing weapons for the levels in between.

 

 

 

My definition of limit in the case of combat means, better weapons and armours than what we have now, of course other improvements can be made to things such as graphics. Think about this, the fixed maximum level for these combat skills is 99, they won't be able to come up with equipments with a 120 level requirement since there's no such thing.

 

 

 

 

 

UNLESS.......they increase the max level for the skills.

 

 

 

OR.......they push all the requirement for the current equipments downwards to make way for more equipment.

[folmer_veeman]

armor already decreases damage taken...

[easonadam]

armor already decreases damage taken...

 

 

 

armour decreases the chance of being hit it has no bearing on how hgh they hit.