September 10, 200718 yr the charge is carryed by the player not by the ring - if you got a ring to 1 then sold it and tryed to do the same with another ring it would melt on the first ore....... and if the other player had just melted a ring they could happly smelt 154(i think thats the correct amount it dosent matter if its not i dont want to see the next 40 posts flaming me over that rather than answering his question oh and dont say out about that < or that< well you get the point) ps i like to rant randomly :D
September 10, 200718 yr the charge is carryed by the player not by the ring - if you got a ring to 1 then sold it and tryed to do the same with another ring it would melt on the first ore....... and if the other player had just melted a ring they could happly smelt 154(i think thats the correct amount it dosent matter if its not i dont want to see the next 40 posts flaming me over that rather than answering his question oh and dont say out about that < or that< well you get the point) ps i like to rant randomly :D Gratz on making no sense at all.
September 10, 200718 yr tyvm am getting better at it :D the start of it was ment to make sense thow .... :wall: basicly all of your rings of forging will have the same charge on (think about it and it explains what i said- ignor the bit were i rant on like am starting to do now)
September 10, 200718 yr The charges are per character not per ring. So If you sell it and the person has never used 1 then he gets all 140 Click for My Blog670th to 99 Smithing July 21st, 07 |743rd to 99 Mining November 29th, 07 | 649th to 99 Runecrafting May 18th, 08 | 29,050th to 99 Defence October 20th, 08 | 20,700th to 99 Magic November 8, 08 | 47,938th to 99 Attack December 19, 08 | 37,829th to 99 Hitpoints December 24, 08 | 68,604th to 99 Strength February 4, 09 | 27,983rd to 99 Range February 9, 09 | 9,725th to 99 Prayer June 8, 09 | 6,620th to 99 Slayer December, 12 09 | 4,075th to 99 Summoning December, 28 09 | 3,551th to 99 Herblore February 24, 10 | 3,192th to 99 Dungeoneering November 11, 10 | 146,600th to 99 Cooking December 29th, 10 | 11,333rd to 99 Construction June 7th, 11 | 16,648th to 99 Farming August 1st, 11 | 19,993th to 99 Crafting August 2nd, 11 | 89,739th to 99 Woodcutting Janurary 1st, 12 | 55,424th to 99 Fishing May 9th, 12| 60,648th to 99 Firemaking May 12th, 12 | 16666th to 99 Agility May 17th, 2012 | 24476th to 99 Hunter June 1st, 2012 | 57,881st to 99 Fletching June 1st, 2012 | All 99s June 1st, 2012 | 3183th to 120 Dungeoneering July 24th, 2012 | 2341st to 2496 Total level July 24th, 2012 | Completionist Cape July 24th, 2012
September 10, 200718 yr Author Darn, my great scheme for making money has been disproven :cry: Oh well, thanks for the replys
September 11, 200718 yr Darn, my great scheme for making money has been disproven :cry: Oh well, thanks for the replys "Great scheme", you mean Great scam?
September 11, 200718 yr Technically, its not a scam. If it was charges per RING, it would only be a scam if he said: 'Selling Ring of forging, 140 charges, 3k!' But if he just said: 'Sellign ring of forging, 3k' He isn't lying, so he's selling what he's offering.
September 11, 200718 yr Technically, its not a scam. If it was charges per RING, it would only be a scam if he said: 'Selling Ring of forging, 140 charges, 3k!' But if he just said: 'Sellign ring of forging, 3k' He isn't lying, so he's selling what he's offering. True, he isn't directly lying, but he is deceiving. He is selling a faulty product with full knowledge of its quality.
Create an account or sign in to comment