January 27, 200917 yr A quick thing I whipped up following semi-closely to a few tutorials @ http://www.vectortuts.com A vector I did not too long ago, got bored just before I started doing the folds in the coat and gave up :oops: C/C :D Put together a small website layout C/C on it would be nice :) http://mattehmatt.deviantart.com/art/Sn ... -111005660
January 27, 200917 yr as our good pal borat would say Very nicee :) i love them both 1980 Berlinetta with a 350, bored, mild cam, intake carb, headers, exhaust
January 27, 200917 yr Both amazing! The shape of the snowboard could use some work (it looks a little bent). Other than that, they're great. :thumbup: Thanks to Uno for the awsome sig <3
January 27, 200917 yr i would totally add detail to the snowboarder one though.. stop being lazy!! the hat would look great with detail, jacket would look alright with just a bit of shading. and the pants, maybe just add some lines for pockets? then id say its finished! 1980 Berlinetta with a 350, bored, mild cam, intake carb, headers, exhaust
January 27, 200917 yr Author The board is a little bent to show the flex in it, pulling up on an indy does that :P
January 27, 200917 yr its still off then, you bent the bottom line, and not the top one, the top part would be bent too 1980 Berlinetta with a 350, bored, mild cam, intake carb, headers, exhaust
January 27, 200917 yr The board is a little bent to show the flex in it, pulling up on an indy does that :P Yes, I know that. I snowboard. : It would have to be bent on both sides, like Yaff said. It doesn't look bent up or down, but bent side to side. There's an inconsistency, and it just looks a little off. Thanks to Uno for the awsome sig <3
January 27, 200917 yr just and example 1980 Berlinetta with a 350, bored, mild cam, intake carb, headers, exhaust
January 27, 200917 yr I like the snowboarder one, but you should take yaff's advice. :) 8,180WONGTONG IS THE BEST AND IS MORE SUPERIOR THAN ME#1 Wongtong stalker.Im looking for some No Limit soldiers!
January 28, 200917 yr Cool, but I like the second one more. Could you post the stock here, I might try and vector it :] 2257AD.TUMBLR.COM
January 28, 200917 yr Author I dont know where the stock went >.> Sorry :thumbdown: Edit: NVM Found ittt :) [hide=][/hide]
January 28, 200917 yr Okay, next step is to not directly copy from an image. I dunno' about the site, it looks pretty basic. I think it's the placement of your boxes and the text used in the title. It needs to be more orderly and aligned (the space between the edge and the box and the space between the boxes themself). Blah, I can't explain stuff like this. Take a look at this: Note how the boxes are even and aligned to give it that sleek/appealing/attractive look. First time giving some sort of website c/c so forgive me for messing up. ☢ CAUTION ☢ CAUTION ☢ CAUTION ☢ CAUTION ☢
January 29, 200917 yr Author No its fine :P But I was almost trying to move away from the orderly boxes, they can be sleek, but they can also be boring, and yeah I wasn't really sure about the font at the top, was going to see what C/C had to say about it :P
Create an account or sign in to comment