May 4, 200917 yr Gee thanks, last time I explain things to people -.- Hey hey, I was going to add you on the list but I thought you would look at the edit and you know ...
May 4, 200917 yr This is best illustrated by the 1976 virus that appeared and the united states began manditory vaccinations and in the end more people died of the vaccine then the virus.You do realize that could be taken as an extremely good thing, right? :P
May 4, 200917 yr Going from a strictly financial view, I would be against mandatory flu vaccinations. Often, flu vaccines are already on short supply and reserved to the elderly and children. Producing at least double the vaccines would cost quite a bit of government money and add more to tax dollars. Overall, I'm against the use of mandatory vaccines that hurt nobody but yourself. The shots given to you as a baby should be mandatory because any illness at that young of an age could cause fatality. I don't know why you haven't gotten any mandatory vaccines Range, but I honestly think you're an idiot for doing so. You're also depriving yourself of experiences if you would ever want to leave your country for travel. Until you get vaccines, you're going to be stuck where you live for the rest of your life. YOU! ATTEND TET EVENTS! CLICK HERE!
May 6, 200917 yr No, after all, if everyone (even low risk people eg. ages 13-40 with no health issues) are vaccinated, the virus may build an unnecessary immunity. "Those who give up their liberty for more security neither deserve liberty nor security." Support transparency... and by extension, freedom and democracy.
Create an account or sign in to comment