May 17, 200917 yr I am almost 96 Fishing and I was wondering if I should switch to barbarian fishing sharks, or should I stick to monkfish
May 17, 200917 yr Monkfish is faster exp Sharks is better cash, your choice. Proud Warlord of DragonwoodIf it's natural to kill, how come men have to go into training to learn how? ~ Joan Baez Rest in Peace 3xtermination
May 17, 200917 yr I thought Monkfish was better cash? Do monkfish either way. [Summoning guide (AOW)] [Slayer guide] [Melee & Brawl player]
May 17, 200917 yr No sharks make better money but monks are better You can make the money difference between the two in the time wasted by sharks
May 17, 200917 yr 1:53 - fishing sharks for an hour - currently 0 sharks 2:53 - fishing sharks for an hour - currently 119 sharks Harpoon fishing (sharks) - 13k exp per hour at 91 fishing. 107k cash 3:00 - fishing monks for an hour - currently 0 monks. 4:00 - fishing monks for an hour - currently 285 monks. Estimate : 287 Net fishing (monks) - 34k exp per hour at 91 fishing. 105k cash I found this on google. If you really want to fish sharks even with this, be my guest... [Summoning guide (AOW)] [Slayer guide] [Melee & Brawl player]
May 17, 200917 yr Author Ok, I'll fish monks :P. Is it worth having an ibis out while fishing, does it really help?
May 17, 200917 yr Enough to cover the costs of the pouch, that's for sure. [Summoning guide (AOW)] [Slayer guide] [Melee & Brawl player]
May 17, 200917 yr Monkfish are faster exp, and sharks are ahead in price, but then again, you can catch monks more quickly... "Those who give up their liberty for more security neither deserve liberty nor security." Support transparency... and by extension, freedom and democracy.
Create an account or sign in to comment