Halo, can I have the original of that picture of you that I put "He's staring into your soul" on?

I keep seeing 1 guest lurking... i wonder if it is different people or someone who has taken an interest in /FG/...

Halo, can I have the original of that picture of you that I put "He's staring into your soul" on?

I deleted a while ago Death.

Sorry.

 

 

Also:

......

[hide=Camwhoring]

[/hide]

 

 

I can't decide which one I like best.

Also, I dunno why the middle one is so big

[hide=Camwhoring]

[/hide]

 

 

I can't decide which one I like best.

Also, I dunno why the middle one is so big

Also: Meanwhile browsing the /v/ board:

3,600 posts until we surpass the raging behemoth known as the "You're Banned" thread. :thumbup:

Little under 200 posts till 2k posts

OOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooo

10.29 posts average and rising. I'll be at 20 in no time. :thumbup:

a little bit of poast couldn't hurt

Meanwhile, searching for good references of who's face.

He deserves a medal for having the balls to make a video of himself doing the caramelldansen.

Meanwhile, searching for good references of who's face.

He deserves a medal for having the balls to make a video of himself doing the caramelldansen.

or a slap in the face for being dumb enough to.

You think they can fix this?

its a bbcode bug right

The tag is a custom tag that was added by the site admin(s) (one of the cool things about BBCode is the ability to make custom tags; the [media] tag is also a custom tag, I believe), which also means they can remove/deactivate them. I do not know what purpose they were made to serve, but that is the only logical way they could have come into being.

It's probably for ease of use by the admins. As all of our posts are surrounded by tags without us typing them. Our sigs too. So, they'd probably just make it an admin only function.

I don't see how it could make anything easier for anyone. The only use we've found so far is breaking pages. They might have it surround posted text in their database, but that would make removing its functionality a big mess. They'd have to remove all instances of it in the database (otherwise the tags would show up in all previous posts) and string comparison of that magnitude could take a long time. Not to mention the fact that they'd have to reconfigure how posts are handled. That is not a project anyone I know would look forward to.

 

I'm guessing there's some special use for it that we have not found yet because setting yourself up for a mess like the project described above is just downright bad horrific coding. It's either that or, more likely, the only reason it has not been removed yet is the very fact that they don't want to face such a project (the fact that it has not been used anywhere but here also helps, but just the potential for anyone to break a bunch of pages is not cool when you're a site admin).

 

:ugeek:

 

Tell me if I'm over-analyzing this. As a geek and a nerd, I never can tell when I'm over-analyzing anything. Also, if I'm missing anything obvious here, let me know. I also have a tendency to miss obvious things when analyzing issues with multiple unknowns.

You think they can fix this?

its a bbcode bug right

The tag is a custom tag that was added by the site admin(s) (one of the cool things about BBCode is the ability to make custom tags; the [media] tag is also a custom tag, I believe), which also means they can remove/deactivate them. I do not know what purpose they were made to serve, but that is the only logical way they could have come into being.

It's probably for ease of use by the admins. As all of our posts are surrounded by tags without us typing them. Our sigs too. So, they'd probably just make it an admin only function.

-snip-

:ugeek:

 

Tell me if I'm over-analyzing this. As a geek and a nerd, I never can tell when I'm over-analyzing anything. Also, if I'm missing anything obvious here, let me know. I also have a tendency to miss obvious things when analyzing issues with multiple unknowns.

Nope, you explained quite well.

I understood what you were talking about.

Which is important.

You think they can fix this?

its a bbcode bug right

The tag is a custom tag that was added by the site admin(s) (one of the cool things about BBCode is the ability to make custom tags; the [media] tag is also a custom tag, I believe), which also means they can remove/deactivate them. I do not know what purpose they were made to serve, but that is the only logical way they could have come into being.

It's probably for ease of use by the admins. As all of our posts are surrounded by tags without us typing them. Our sigs too. So, they'd probably just make it an admin only function.

-snip-

:ugeek:

 

Tell me if I'm over-analyzing this. As a geek and a nerd, I never can tell when I'm over-analyzing anything. Also, if I'm missing anything obvious here, let me know. I also have a tendency to miss obvious things when analyzing issues with multiple unknowns.

Nope, you explained quite well.

I understood what you were talking about.

Which is important.

That is important. There's nothing worse than writing (or just saying) a bunch of stuff and then having everyone who reads it not understand what's being said (another problem I have, especially at work; loan officers know nothing about computers :wall: ).

[hide]

Meanwhile, searching for good references of who's face.

[/hide]

He deserves a medal for having the balls to make a video of himself doing the caramelldansen.

or a slap in the face for being dumb enough to.

Slap him in the face with a medal. But have him put some clothes on first.

You think they can fix this?

its a bbcode bug right

The tag is a custom tag that was added by the site admin(s) (one of the cool things about BBCode is the ability to make custom tags; the [media] tag is also a custom tag, I believe), which also means they can remove/deactivate them. I do not know what purpose they were made to serve, but that is the only logical way they could have come into being.

It's probably for ease of use by the admins. As all of our posts are surrounded by tags without us typing them. Our sigs too. So, they'd probably just make it an admin only function.

-snip-

:ugeek:

 

Tell me if I'm over-analyzing this. As a geek and a nerd, I never can tell when I'm over-analyzing anything. Also, if I'm missing anything obvious here, let me know. I also have a tendency to miss obvious things when analyzing issues with multiple unknowns.

Or... y'know... Maybe doesn't actually have any secret use and some admin just made it to [bleep] with us

Geez, i really regret it that i didnt save what who posted

 

[hide]

[/hide]

This pages is a mess of random code thingys.

 

[hide]

[/hide]

NEEEEEEEEEEEEERDS!

You know you want to be like them.

:arrow:

Who, i beg you to pm me that code again >.>

Just for saving purposes, i wont post it.

:arrow: