That's kind of why I decided against it...

wits added me the other night. it wasn't the first time, so I just went with it. I've talked to her online since like 2007 anyway and she could probably see a bunch of my stuff because my brother was a mutual friend

It's kind of scary that facebook knows that we know people from here. It's recommended pie and Halo both for me, and I've gotten a friend request from Wits.

Post.

Facebook hasn't recommended Pie or Halo to me. It's recommended Tyler, Gallade, and Napalm. Maybe a few others I'm forgetting. I've yet to get a request from Wits.

It's kind of scary that facebook knows that we know people from here. It's recommended pie and Halo both for me, and I've gotten a friend request from Wits.

Never gotten a recommendation.

Oh yeah, it's recommended Gallade too. Forgot about that one.

Everyone talks about "facebook stalking", but facebook does a lot of the stalking without the user.

Then I posted again

It's kind of scary that facebook knows that we know people from here. It's recommended pie and Halo both for me, and I've gotten a friend request from Wits.

orly?

 

 

i've never gotten any suggestions for you guys

Someone want to look at this and tell me how to make it less shitty?

 

[hide]

Analytical Reflection: There are many pressing national and international public policy issues that society faces at the beginning of the 21st century. Select one you feel passionate about and tell us why you believe it is significant and then propose a strategy to address the issue. (limit 300 words/2000 characters)

 

The United States military presence has run on for 10 years now, and have proved a large drain on resources for what seems, at times, like little result. The significance of this comes in part from the cost of the war. The money spent on the Iraq war alone exceeds $1.2 trillion, which is no small sum. In addition to the cost, most, if not all, of the United State's goals have been achieved. Sadam Hussein has been removed from power for many years, and the democracy instituted in his place is an excellent start for the country. Finally, the US provides stability for the region. However, Iraq can't simply rely on the US military to supply defense, and needs to organize its own forces.

 

The third point in particular makes simply pulling out of Iraq a difficult proposition. The United States has made a large investment in Iraq, and having that investment be fruitless doesn't seem very smart. The obvious answer to this is to not leave immediately, but to reduce the military presence of America, while increasing Iraq's army and police capabilities, so that they can defend themselves. The reduction of American troops will force Iraq to create their own forces to maintain peace and stability. By providing training and support, America can ensure that Iraq is ready to protect itself when America leaves completely. Obviously, the issue is more complicated than this, and many more details would have to be specified, but as a general strategy this would help to reduce the cost of the war, helping the US to get back on its feet at a time it needs to the most.

[/hide]

Highly, highly considering "accidentally" sleeping through classes tomorrow.

Thank god I have a late start tomorrow. Most convenient late start ever.

 

Also, as of 12:01 tonight, I won't have to worry about college stuff again for a while, at least.

asdfads

Post.

Yeah buddy.

Well I'm off to bed. Night.

Facebook keeps trying to get me to add my friends' brothers and sisters. Why would I want to do that?

[hide]The United States military presence has gone on for 10 years now, and has proven to be a large drain on resources for what seems to be, at times, little progress. The significance of this comes in part from the cost of the war. The money spent on the Iraq war alone exceeds $1.2 trillion, which is no small amount. In addition to the cost, most, if not all, of the United State's goals have been achieved. Sadam Hussein has been removed from power for many years, and the democracy instituted in his place is an excellent start for the country; finally, the US provides stability for the region. However, Iraq can't simply rely on the US military to supply defense, and needs to organize its own forces.

 

The third point in particular makes simply pulling out of Iraq a difficult proposition. The United States has made a large investment in Iraq, and having that investment be fruitless doesn't make much sense. The obvious answer to this is to not leave immediately, but to reduce the military presence of America, while increasing Iraq's army and police capabilities, so that they can defend themselves. The reduction of American troops will force Iraq to create their own forces to maintain peace and stability. By providing training and support, America can ensure that Iraq is ready to protect itself when America leaves completely. Obviously, the issue is more complicated than this, and many more details would have to be specified, but as a general strategy this would help to reduce the cost of the war, helping the US to focus on the home front at a time it needs to the most. [/hide]

I might just have a different writing style, but I changed a few things slightly to make it flow a bit more. You probably want to alter the content of the first sentence to make it sound more like a topic sentence, but the last sentence concludes it well. I dunno what else to tell you at this point. 40 minutes to midnight, good luck

I think emily's reads better

Mmk, I took all of your changes except for this one:

 

Sadam Hussein has been removed from power for many years, and the democracy instituted in his place is an excellent start for the country; finally, the US provides stability for the region.

 

Because that's not how semi colons work.

Mmk, submitted. I'm done with that. I just need to get some good references to make up for the shitty application.

PLAGIARISM#$%^#%@#$^%@#^@#$

he got permission to copy it though

 

Heh