GulfKid Posted October 7, 2005 Share Posted October 7, 2005 -Most PKs. A "point system" could be implemented to keep track of how many PKs you've gotten over a certain period of time. Say, a month. (to give new PKers an equal shot at getting onto the boards) Could be divided into wilderness PKs and arena PKs. -Richest players These could be put into the current hiscores to add a little change of pace in the competitiveness of the game. You can think of more, these are all I could think of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lpinkus Posted October 8, 2005 Share Posted October 8, 2005 PKs, fine. However, I think having a "richest" category on the high scores would make even more players care too much about accumulating gp. I don't think JAGeX wants that. I think they'd prefer that the playing community has more balanced interests as a whole. lpinkus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcley Posted October 8, 2005 Share Posted October 8, 2005 No and no. The PK system could be badly abused by several people killing each other. I don't really like the richest players table either. There would be many practical difficulties in setting it up. What's the value of phats, for example? Prices keep changing all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevester77 Posted October 8, 2005 Share Posted October 8, 2005 -Richest players These could be put into the current hiscores to add a little change of pace in the competitiveness of the game. quote] Why so you can know the #1 person you should be hacking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AThousandLies Posted October 8, 2005 Share Posted October 8, 2005 Regarding PK's ... I don't know if Jagex have a way of recording PK's. And additionally, there's the issue of team PKing; would it be half HP, final hit, both or something else to determine who got it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jafnn Posted October 8, 2005 Share Posted October 8, 2005 I disagree with both idea's. The Pking system would be much to easy to cheat at just have 10 of youre friends keep walking from lumbridge to a certain place in the wildy on lvl 3 accounts and wait for them there with a steel twohander. And I think the wealth highscore would increase the amount of scamming and false accusations. f2p skilltotal 1050+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banditx31 Posted October 8, 2005 Share Posted October 8, 2005 im happy as it is now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost-Knigth Posted October 8, 2005 Share Posted October 8, 2005 Lol, this have been up so many times.. Pk: No.. Then you'll just kill your friends... :roll: Wealth: Scamming and hacking... :roll: 99 ranged | 99 magic | 99 defence | 99 hitpointsRemember, it's just a gameFeel free to add me on RS. :) Always ready for a chat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnformedDude Posted October 8, 2005 Share Posted October 8, 2005 No and No like the others said. Wealth: people would just try and hack the highest person and for PKs people would just kill friends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy_Kak Posted October 11, 2005 Share Posted October 11, 2005 No and no. The PK system could be badly abused by several people killing each other. I don't really like the richest players table either. There would be many practical difficulties in setting it up. What's the value of phats, for example? Prices keep changing all the time. um maybe if the pk ranking was for the amound of different people killed, compared to the amount of different people youve been killed by. there could be a way to figure it out, dont just disregard it because u cant think of anything currently smithing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craven_Image Posted October 11, 2005 Share Posted October 11, 2005 I would prefer a death counter rather than a kill counter, or even better, have both. Would save people from 1 iteming or 3 iteming as they would get a death on their record if they died. You could even add time penalties depending on how many deaths you've had but I think having a death on their record would be enough. 99 Magic, 99 Defence, 99 Strength, 99 Attack, 99 Hitpoints, 99 Fletching, 99 Woodcutting, 99 Firemaking, 99 Thieving, 99 Ranged, 99 Prayer, 99 Cooking, 99 Fishing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ar2b8 Posted November 3, 2005 Share Posted November 3, 2005 to respond to the pk highscores, jagex did have that feature up for a few days, they quickly took it down, i guess they realized how bad of an idea it was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
my_pet_worm Posted November 3, 2005 Share Posted November 3, 2005 the only other good highscore thing i can think of is quest points... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E_D_G_E_1039 Posted November 3, 2005 Share Posted November 3, 2005 ^^ I agree. I was hoping you were suggesting quest points, not as a "top 500,000", but to be shown when someone is looked up. Would be nice :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suzanne_Vega Posted November 3, 2005 Share Posted November 3, 2005 QPs would be good, but it would have to work the same way as all other hiscores, otherwise it would be pointless. The only usefull difference would be if there was a way of seeing exactly which quests were completed, and maybe have a separate score for f2p, since there is a BIG difference between f2p and p2p questing. Suzanne Vegatokin rite wurx gud! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E_D_G_E_1039 Posted November 3, 2005 Share Posted November 3, 2005 QPs would be good, but it would have to work the same way as all other hiscores, otherwise it would be pointless. The only usefull difference would be if there was a way of seeing exactly which quests were completed, and maybe have a separate score for f2p, since there is a BIG difference between f2p and p2p questing. Well, since MANY (thousands of people) have the same amounts of qp, wouldn't it be best if they just showed them when you looked somebody up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now