November 24, 200520 yr No offense, but I don't like the idea, I like it the way it is for some reason.
November 24, 200520 yr No. Bad idea. Rares were really pieces of junk but people made it high priced. It doesn't matter. Plus, he should've checked for a tree spirit BEFORE he went to the bathroom...that's a key to afk'ing? Plus, if you die in wildy, you have to wait for the person to finish choosing to get loot...NO Nah, you have to choose before you die. If you dont then its the simple jagex default, if you do then you keep them.
November 28, 200520 yr well the reason you can is because people have to think wisely about what to bring Lastfm
November 28, 200520 yr I think its fine the way it is if you go to the toilet without logging out while your wearing a yellow party hat you DESERVE to lose it.
November 28, 200520 yr that is a good idea..... but the programming jaggex would have to do is ridiculous..... they should do it!
January 23, 200620 yr that is a great idea i got killed by a black drag and and it dropped my glory ammy, wealth ring, rune full helm, and kite over rune pl8 and pl8 legs. :twisted: Thank you Yaff2 for the amazing sig and avvy
January 28, 200620 yr Bullsh1t idea. OH NOES I DIED WITH MY P HAT ON! *keeps p hat* Those items should be removed from the game. Dont say i have never owned a holiday item because i have. And got rid of it after 5 minutes.
January 28, 200620 yr no way! what if someone died in wildy, then when u get to choose ur 3 items, u log off? then ppl who killed u never got their stuff..etc etc this idea is bad...no offense if you die..then too bad..i guess.you're responsible for your own loss Miami Heat 4ever fan.Yes, i'm a girl! I like to watch NBA, so? =]]Thanks star_in_the_sky for the AMAZING sig and eckered for the great avvy!!
January 28, 200620 yr I care not for PKing, but this idea would make it terrible. One of the things that makes RS interesting are the items that are valuabe to players as compared to general stores. A nature talisman is a good example. As far as the non-PKing world goes, there still needs to be a risk from randoms, with which the proposed idea also interferes, Lpinkus
Create an account or sign in to comment