cjlhdevil Posted May 1, 2005 Share Posted May 1, 2005 Wwoooowww really? I didn't know that Here's another great fact : DON'T BUMP UP OLD POSTS WITH POINTLESS STEAMING PILES OF DOG CR*P! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHIPPOU Posted May 1, 2005 Share Posted May 1, 2005 bah, it's been over 6 bil ever since I was born this site is a bit off , but good info. none the less http://cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/xx.html ********** One of the old guard of RS. RS birthday = Feb - 27 - 2002 Proud member of the original forum.********** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted May 1, 2005 Share Posted May 1, 2005 bah, it's been over 6 bil ever since I was born :shock: You are under 5 years old? The 'official' 6 billionth person was born in eastern europe in like 2000. It was given there because there was a war going on at the time. I'm glad my geography class comes in useful sometimes :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLancer Posted May 1, 2005 Share Posted May 1, 2005 The most efficent way to decrease the worlds population is for 50 year to only allow one child per couple which would effictively half the worlds population Friend of mine told me that once. Not a good thing. In most western countries, the average amount of childs per woman is allready below 2. Meaning that the only reason populaton doesn't decrease yet, is that people just live longer. And only 1 child, have you ever though about the economy? It would be soooooooo ruined. Especially with out social system. Not to be rude and offhanded towards only child people, but I mean most of the time they are spoilt, arrogaunt and social inept. They are queit often used to getting what they want. Blahh Blahh... Your description fits about 4% of all the children in the world. The rest don't in some cases even have clean water to drink. Yet it's those 4% that consume 95% of the resources, compared to 5% by that 96% of children. So I say build a huge spanking machine and teach those western kids to respect their parents and shut up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zippi08 Posted May 1, 2005 Share Posted May 1, 2005 The most efficent way to decrease the worlds population is for 50 year to only allow one child per couple which would effictively half the worlds population Friend of mine told me that once. That'd cause a lot of trouble. They already have a law like that in China and in like 40 years there's going to be too many old people in China who need help surviving with no one to take care of them. If a couple is only allowed one child, what if that child dies later when the couple gets old and needs taking care of? Also, parents all want their children to get a good education and job etc. In families with more than one child, if one child doesn't succeed so well in school and later in life, they have another child to hope on. But in China people only have one child so the children have so much pressure on them to try and go their own way, but also to try and satisfy their parents at the same time. Thanks for the sig, Runesmithie :)RIP Steve Irwin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demeige Posted May 1, 2005 Share Posted May 1, 2005 this reminds me *loads gun* How does a profession differ from an occupation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHIPPOU Posted May 1, 2005 Share Posted May 1, 2005 bah, it's been over 6 bil ever since I was born :shock: You are under 5 years old? The 'official' 6 billionth person was born in eastern europe in like 2000. It was given there because there was a war going on at the time. I'm glad my geography class comes in useful sometimes :) oops :oops: it was 4 Billion 430 Million people when I was born. ********** One of the old guard of RS. RS birthday = Feb - 27 - 2002 Proud member of the original forum.********** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubsa Posted May 1, 2005 Share Posted May 1, 2005 Wwoooowww really? I didn't know that Here's another great fact : DON'T BUMP UP OLD POSTS WITH POINTLESS STEAMING PILES OF DOG CR*P! Is it just me or... Whenever people bump an old thread, people admonish them for doing so, as above. Yet, whenever someone makes a new topic on the similar subject, they're told to use the search button for an older thread :? Seems to me nowadays you can't win. This is how much you all raised for charity. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cjlhdevil Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 Wwoooowww really? I didn't know that Here's another great fact : DON'T BUMP UP OLD POSTS WITH POINTLESS STEAMING PILES OF DOG CR*P! Is it just me or... Whenever people bump an old thread, people admonish them for doing so, as above. Yet, whenever someone makes a new topic on the similar subject, they're told to use the search button for an older thread :? Seems to me nowadays you can't win.I know what you're saying and that is why I'm gonna retract my comment. It was like 3am and been out at night :P. I don't mind anyone bumping an old thread with like a question or if they like state a reason. Like if at the top of the thread said Bumping old post to restart convosation : But most the time it's someone bumping it and just saying like "yeah I agree" at which point it just becomes stupid. But I see what ya mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now