SHIPPOU Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/clock2.html Disturbing eh? that is not actual, and I dought they count deaths I beleave they are using the birth per second rate. ********** One of the old guard of RS. RS birthday = Feb - 27 - 2002 Proud member of the original forum.********** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHIPPOU Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 acording to that site, there are an average of 24.6% of americans are at poverty lvl. ********** One of the old guard of RS. RS birthday = Feb - 27 - 2002 Proud member of the original forum.********** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vape Posted July 27, 2004 Author Share Posted July 27, 2004 Erm, a few things need clearing up here. That's the average world population, it DOES take into account births AND deaths. However, since most of the world's births and deaths are not recorded, those figures are just an estimate. I believe the approximate figures are 5 births and 2 deaths per second. mhc_leader, of the 6.3 billion worldwide, about 1.3 billion are in China (20%) and just over 1 billion are in India(16%). This is not caused by them having more sexual desire, but by socio-economic factors in those countries. ~Cameron Where the bloody hell are you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jfp221 Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/clock2.html Disturbing eh? that is not actual, and I dought they count deaths I beleave they are using the birth per second rate. They are probably averaging births per second and death's per second and only show it going up but not as fast as people are being born Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xXxNyteMaRexXx Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 wow thats atcually kinda intersting how fast the numbers go up 8) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unknownmasterofnothing Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 Hmm it stops for me after a while.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeldafreek Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 The most efficent way to decrease the worlds population is for 50 year to only allow one child per couple which would effictively half the worlds population Friend of mine told me that once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indy500fan Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 The most efficent way to decrease the worlds population is for 50 year to only allow one child per couple which would effictively half the worlds population Friend of mine told me that once. EDIT: This is just another fun fact, it kinda looked like it was saying something towards your quote, but its not. :END EDIT the earth wouldn't be able to sustain the population if nobody died for 7 days. 90% of the population is made up of those h*rney chinesee..... yet another pointless and completly wrong post by mhc *claps* I thought there was only like 100,000 people in the world :shock: i don't know how anyone could beleive there were only 100,000 people in the world, but it did give me a good laugh for about 10 minutes. there are so many examples im thinking of right now, but the easiest is to just think of ww2. 6mil jews killed, 11mil total killed by the nazi's. those numbers just really don't add up with the world's population jsut being 100,000 :wink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlakMajik Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 Wow, I could sit here all day and just watch them numbers tick over, and over, and over.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephanie Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 wow that's so so freaky :shock: .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lliamjhinds Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/clock2.html Disturbing eh?that could drive ppl to kill themselfs to slow that down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vmser Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 The most efficent way to decrease the worlds population is for 50 year to only allow one child per couple which would effictively half the worlds population Friend of mine told me that once. Not a good thing. In most western countries, the average amount of childs per woman is allready below 2. Meaning that the only reason populaton doesn't decrease yet, is that people just live longer. And only 1 child, have you ever though about the economy? It would be soooooooo ruined. Especially with out social system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonsie Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 The most efficent way to decrease the worlds population is for 50 year to only allow one child per couple which would effictively half the worlds population Friend of mine told me that once. Not a good thing. In most western countries, the average amount of childs per woman is allready below 2. Meaning that the only reason populaton doesn't decrease yet, is that people just live longer. And only 1 child, have you ever though about the economy? It would be soooooooo ruined. Especially with out social system. Not to be rude and offhanded towards only child people, but I mean most of the time they are spoilt, arrogaunt and social inept. They are queit often used to getting what they want. Blahh Blahh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmw Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 I'm older than that.....I'm not stupid :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: And also how accurate is that calculator? Lol so I'm guessing it was just a joke then? Cause in both of your posts it sounded like you were dead serious.... :? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubsa Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 I feel pretty helpless just seein it tick over and over, causing more problems and heartache for more deprived families :( Lock this post, I'm gonna cry :( This is how much you all raised for charity. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demeige Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 does it show how many people die? I only see the #'s go up :? How does a profession differ from an occupation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeoteddybear Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 You won't see it go down because like I said...the smallest ratio would probably be 1 person dead, 2 born. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vmser Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 does it show how many people die? I only see the #'s go up :? Increasement of population: Births - deaths. As long as the birthrate is higher then the death rate, it'll go up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death_By_Pod Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 to calculate the population at any given time based of these figures. final population = 6400000000 x e ^ (0.01 x (how many years into the future)) rate of 1 percent is an approximation based on 2 births persecond as a ratio of current population. e.g. aprox for: 10 years - 7 billion 100 years - 17 billion 1000 years - 140969 billion 10000 years - 1.7 x 10^44 billion I cant add anymore numbers as it breaks my pocket calculator (only goes up to 100 digits long). However these numbers are extremely approximated, and the rate of grow can change over time (more/less people want to have children etc.). But that simple equation can give you a decent approximation. N.B e is a constant (around 2.7182) like Pi (22/7). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundy Posted July 29, 2004 Share Posted July 29, 2004 I don't think that sites very accurate as its meant to be that someone is born every 6 seconds and theres its like 2 per second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vmser Posted July 29, 2004 Share Posted July 29, 2004 I don't think that sites very accurate as its meant to be that someone is born every 6 seconds and theres its like 2 per second. every 6 seconds? worldwide? doubt that, probably for a certain country? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubsa Posted July 29, 2004 Share Posted July 29, 2004 I don't think that sites very accurate as its meant to be that someone is born every 6 seconds and theres its like 2 per second. every 6 seconds? worldwide? doubt that, probably for a certain country? You're right. Not sure which country, could be England for all I know. I don't like looking at this though. Because the world is already packed as it is, and with this happening, I'd say about 59/60 people born will suffer poor quality of life and may not even live past 6 or soemthing. It's just..sad :( This is how much you all raised for charity. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bs_johannes Posted July 30, 2004 Share Posted July 30, 2004 actually its estimated that the number of alive humans today exceeds the number of humans that have ever died!! our planet is estimated to be able to supply 12 billion people, counting by an avarage standard of today (not counting factors such as pollution and other destructive forces that destroy our supplys). that population will be exceeded not to far into the future.. hmm.. we are in trouble. My solution is that every family in the world eats 1 of their children. That would cut down the population and also feed the starving people of the world. if our numbers should grow all to thin of this we can always suspend driver licences for peopla above 65 years and we will once again see a populationboom. :wink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kix Posted May 1, 2005 Share Posted May 1, 2005 uh.... it wont be too bad, in case india and africa and countries like that won't invade estonia and russia. both countries population is decreasing. (russian is actually decreasing like 100,000 ppl per year i think.. not sure tho). :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blizzard666 Posted May 1, 2005 Share Posted May 1, 2005 uh.... it wont be too bad, in case india and africa and countries like that won't invade estonia and russia. both countries population is decreasing. (russian is actually decreasing like 100,000 ppl per year i think.. not sure tho). :D Can you say old post? But since i will not be accused of spam, ill add something. I yes do find that weird, thats completely amazing how many people are coming into the world. It actually shocked me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now