June 20, 200620 yr Background a little plain, though I really like the whole sig. Nice job... Though try blending the render better than just using Overlay. Jamesino? o_O Nothing amazing, but I like it.
June 20, 200620 yr Author Any suggestions on how to blend the render better or improve the background? Thanks
June 20, 200620 yr Its to monotone, it makes the sig a bit boring. And the text needs work. I'd give about 4-5/10 because of ^
June 20, 200620 yr Why is there someone elses name inside the sig? In Khazakstan we say God, Man, Horse, Dog, then Woman, Rat and small cockroach..M.A.D 4 Lyfe
June 20, 200620 yr Why is there someone elses name inside the sig? +1 i really hope u didnt rip it :-k
June 20, 200620 yr mind proving it? sorry but you gotta admit its kinda sketchy... In Khazakstan we say God, Man, Horse, Dog, then Woman, Rat and small cockroach..M.A.D 4 Lyfe
June 20, 200620 yr Ya know, just drop it. Nobody asks me, "How come on you're signatures there's "Yudi" or "Chimpkiller"? This guy's no different. The only way you can prove it is if you find the person who actually made it. No reason to keep asking him to prove it.
June 20, 200620 yr He could take 5 mins of time to take a screeni of his character to prove me wrong. IF anything I want him to prove me wrong - but Im not just gunna sit here and not say anything when I see something sketchy. In Khazakstan we say God, Man, Horse, Dog, then Woman, Rat and small cockroach..M.A.D 4 Lyfe
June 21, 200620 yr Well, what seems sketchy? I'm no different from him. My apologies if my previous post sounded rude, But I don't like how "guilty until proven innocent" system works.
June 21, 200620 yr #1 I dont even know who you are, I only asked him cause he only has round 10 posts. #2 Apology accepted #3 I live in Canada. The burden is on the Crown (prosecutor) to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty. (Innocent intill proven Guilty) In Khazakstan we say God, Man, Horse, Dog, then Woman, Rat and small cockroach..M.A.D 4 Lyfe
June 21, 200620 yr I think you guys should take a closer look at the left of 'Jamesino' in the type part...
June 21, 200620 yr I think you guys should take a closer look at the left of 'Jamesino' in the type part... I see exactly what you mean, looks to me like a ripper and a bad fake maker... If not, then I am willing to give you the sincerest (sp?) of apologies.
June 21, 200620 yr I think you guys should take a closer look at the left of 'Jamesino' in the type part... I noticed that too. I didn't think anything of the different name on the sig but then I saw the screen shot and I got a little skeptical. I didn't say anything because I wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt.
June 21, 200620 yr Yea, explain 'Jamesino'! :o :lol: [http://woopidoo2.deviantart.com][Tip.it Moderator from Dec 10, 2006 to 03 Sep, 2008]
June 21, 200620 yr not sure if it is a fake, but go into rs and u can actually see that little square :shock: EDIT: here "A disbelief in magic can force some poor souls into believing in authority and business"
June 21, 200620 yr ^^I see, but he saved the screeny as Jpeg, Jpg, so you see texture on it. But the square isnt textured, it looks like its made up later or something :anxious: [http://woopidoo2.deviantart.com][Tip.it Moderator from Dec 10, 2006 to 03 Sep, 2008]
June 21, 200620 yr ^^I see, but he saved the screeny as Jpeg, Jpg, so you see texture on it. But the square isnt textured, it looks like its made up later or something :anxious: looks the same to me... If people really don't trust this, why not just ask to make a new sig or just talk in game.
June 21, 200620 yr I guess its not ripped. That corner on the screen is fine. About the sig itself. the text is harldy visible. Only noticed about it after reading some comments. only a single color hue in the sig, doesn't look very "interesting" to me I am not a big fan of using renders, but that's something personal maybe. .: Systemless :.
Create an account or sign in to comment