Alrightaaa!

 

seniore et seniorata's

 

 

 

i give you!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Flam (short for Flamboyance)

 

 

 

a little something i wanted to do, making someone apear very flamboyant in every piece on him..

 

 

 

this phase is mainly for corrections on proportions..

 

 

 

i may have to make his legs longer.. what do you guys thank? ay?

looks cool already!

Nice shape :D

 

 

 

~N

 

 

 

PS It's going to be good!

ye needs biger legs or shorter torser looking nice thow

please give it bright purple, orange or green shag dress..much like a pimp :pray:

please give it bright purple, orange or green shag dress..much like a silly person :pray:

 

 

 

i think not this man is no pimp

 

 

 

i'm going for more 1700 flamboyance.

 

 

 

i guess ill post an update soon.

please give it bright purple, orange or green shag dress..much like a silly person :pray:

 

 

 

i think not this man is no silly person

 

 

 

i'm going for more 1700 flamboyance.

 

 

 

i guess ill post an update soon.

 

 

 

 

 

ahhh ok fine.still lookin good though \

Yup, the legs should be longer, and the pose is off; unless he's facing away from the 'camera', when it's fine.

 

 

 

Can't wait to see this one.

The pose is rather confusing, it seems as if he's leaning away from the stick thing. Apart from the fact, that this is almost impossible, considering the position of his legs (unless the stick is in motion), it looks plain odd.

 

 

 

Part of the torso could stand to go, the legs are just fine. The neck needs to be a tiny bit thicker and longer, and his biceps could be less pointy, and his left tricep, smaller.

 

 

 

Why doesn't he get a special grey for his crotch?

i've tested the pose and it's absolutely fine, possible and you have take notion that he is not leaning on his stick, the stick is merely an extension to the body.. so to speak.

 

if the stick is in motion or not it doesn't matter how is leaning away from a stick almoste impossible..

 

 

 

let me explain the stick..

 

people in the 1700's used walking stick's not to lean on just to keep in there hands in a matter of fashion, it made one look rich, stylish, flamboyant.

 

 

 

"could stand to go".. whats that? no actually the legs weren't fine, i changed them.

 

the neck is a matter of style as are the way it is drawn, mind you there are going to be clothes over it so the muscles won't be visible at all.

 

i draw them nonetheless just.. for drawing's sake.

 

 

 

he is not directly facing the viewer, ntce the hip's and the body turn..

 

so the pose isn't off :P

 

 

 

why no special grey area for his crotch?

 

no offense.. sorry but don't make me laugh we don't house lighthouses in there.. so i see no reason why.. last time i checked "it" isn't visible through pants.

 

unless he's one of those very very very very very very very very rare exceptions which he's not... that would be handicap.

 

 

 

..why am i to lazy to even post an update to this

 

:-s

 

sorry if i came off as agressive, reading back my post it sounds like it.. didn't mean to to, wasn't meant to be..

 

 

 

anyway i know why i'm to lazy to post an update.. because i'll have to wait till i'm done with clothing designs...

I know the pose is possible, but it is confusing. It'll make more sense when it's done, I suppose.

 

 

 

Could stand to go basically means, could be done without.

 

 

 

For the record, the you know what, affects the way you stand, and tends to make the clothes covering that area, somewhat closer to the viewer.

 

 

 

Your post didn't sound mean, just niave, though mine probably sounded a bit arrogant. :lol: