Remove the Swift Switch ban

[Looce]

For the record, I'm agreeing with a subset of what's suggested in this post (i.e. to remove the ban on Swift discussion on these Forums), and that is:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The discussion of the Swift client, and reasonable discussion about Swift's IRC network, without promoting them, should be allowed on the forums. Also, the lenience on screenshots made with Swift and clearly showing Swift's name in their title bar should remain: it should be made official that such screenshots are allowed, except where the rest of the post's contents have to do with promoting Swift via the screenshot. The intent is that merely seeing a screenshot showing Swift in the title bar, but whose subject is, for example, a level pic or PK loot pic, is not sufficient to promote Swift.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Topics forbidden by my proposed amendment would include:

 

 

 

• [*:gz7en7m3]topics advocating a client over another (i.e. third-party client wars);
   
   
   
  [*:gz7en7m3]topics advocating the use of Swift via one of its distinctive features, when that feature has an equivalent available in most modern operating systems (e.g. the calculator).

 

 

 

Topics allowed by my proposed amendment, regardless of what is denied, include:

 

 

 

• [*:gz7en7m3]topics questioning the third-party client rule on the Tip.it Forums when updates to Jagex's rules appear, or a new version of a client makes it 100% legal without question;
   
   
   
  [*:gz7en7m3]topics regarding third-party clients as a whole, without specifying one;
   
   
   
  [*:gz7en7m3]topics suggesting that a feature available in one or many third-party clients, when said feature does abide by Jagex's rules, be included in RuneScape. Such topics would be better suited for RuneScape's official forums, but are included in this list for completeness.

[None2None]

 

Calling me dumb for not knowing about 3 other clients is a bit low, wouldn't you think?

 

 

 

I did not call you names. The only instance of "dumb" I could find in my post is this:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'm not as dumb as some may think.

 

 

 

If you look closely, I was quoting you using it. I do not believe in name-calling for the sake of it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And if I look closely, I see that you asked for only one other client, and I did provide one with comparable features to Swift's: RuneHQ's world switcher. Please see the link I provided in my earlier reply.

 

 

 

And if you can name another client, made by a trusted person, with all of the features of SS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also, pretending that someone knows about all world switchers in existence is foolish, and knowing them all should not be expected of neither you nor me. I did not expect this either. Personally, I did a Google search for "RuneScape world switcher" [www.google.ca] to find these three clients. They serve as examples since I cannot enumerate them all in a forum post.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'd like to add that it's the maker's responsibility to advertise a creation of theirs (or the users tell others about it), and as such, Zybez should be the only one promoting Swift or authorising the promotion of it. Tip.it would get in huge wars with Zybez over this, because linking to Swift on Tip.it might be enough for some users to think that there is an affiliation between them. There is not, and should never be.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You seem inclined to bring me down just for the sake of it; can you reply rationally to this post?

 

 

 

first of all, I interpreted

 

 

 

Totally devoid of argumentation except for name-calling.

 

 

 

As you voiding everything that I said except the fact that I called myself "I'm not as dumb as some may think"

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Idk, but there's no reason to use a large vocabulary on a Runescape forum where your mostly discussing 'issues' with people 12-16 years (I personally am 19, but that's aside the point)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

back on topic:

 

 

 

Eh, I disagree about wars that you say would arise because of it, I'm sure all tip.it would have to do is ask Zybez if they could use their client and I'm sure they wouldn't mind, it would as everyone says actually be advertising for them, but at the same time, letting people on tip.it use this resource.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If your suggesting that tip.it should only use it's own resources, I could whip up a client for tip.it, I couldn't make it look as good as others, VB is probably best for that, and I'm more of a Java guy...but I could make it work :roll:, and tip.it could find others possibly experienced in VB to work on fine tuning...but that would be completely possible...put in a few of tip.it's calculators, it would be one of the best...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

eh, actually, I may be able to find a few people willing to help with a project like that...it could be submitted to the tip.it staff, source and everything, and then you could trust that...I guess that could possibly work as a last resort... :wink:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But I dont see why asking Zybez (or any of the other sites) would hurt, there would be virtually no loss.

[Looce]

My totally devoid comment was just for the quote above it. Apologies for the interpretation issue.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, I acknowledge that this forum is for 12-16 year-olds, but the forum admins are the target of this thread ("admins, please allow Swift discussion for this, that and this other reason"), and they are older than that and can reason with logic. Your point is still very valid, though. [which is a bit of why I included Wiki links in my post, but that's another story] [side note: I'm personally 20 years old]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

With the advent of Web-based JavaScript world switchers, people are becoming increasingly wary of downloadable applications and Trojan horses etc.; I could foresee Swift's use decreasing in the future as Web-based switchers become more prominent. Your client would need support by some people, and you would need to be trusted; I could see this trend as a problem in the adoption of a downloadable switcher. Still, you might want to PM some Forum admins about it; they might show some support.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But this is getting very off-topic. XD *runs away from the thread*

[Mercifull]

Why do people even need to talk about it here? Use RSC for SS discussions, end of story. Stop boo hooung about it

[pansynator]

SS and the use of Third party software should be legal. It isn't unfairly beneficial to the users and it follows all the jagex rules.

[None2None]

Ignores one senseless spam post knowing nothing of what he's talking about...we had rants about 1 line posts like this didn't we...great example coming from a guy with 9k posts. :roll: Way to set the example.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yea, your right, that's what we've been discussing...

 

 

 

My totally devoid comment was just for the quote above it. Apologies for the interpretation issue.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, I acknowledge that this forum is for 12-16 year-olds, but the forum admins are the target of this thread ("admins, please allow Swift discussion for this, that and this other reason"), and they are older than that and can reason with logic. Your point is still very valid, though. [which is a bit of why I included Wiki links in my post, but that's another story] [side note: I'm personally 20 years old]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

With the advent of Web-based JavaScript world switchers, people are becoming increasingly wary of downloadable applications and Trojan horses etc.; I could foresee Swift's use decreasing in the future as Web-based switchers become more prominent. Your client would need support by some people, and you would need to be trusted; I could see this trend as a problem in the adoption of a downloadable switcher. Still, you might want to PM some Forum admins about it; they might show some support.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But this is getting very off-topic. XD *runs away from the thread*

 

 

 

Yea, your right, I'd have to be trusted, and considering my background, I doubt I would be...but I could zip the file which allows for scanning before any self-running [Caution: ExecutableFile] or self extracting file can run...eh

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If an admin wants me to work on a world switcher, I can probably make something along the lines of SS, except make it from scratch and call it tip.it's ...you could be the ones to look it over and release it...PM me and I can enlighten you on whatever you'd like to know about me...I only feel like talking to admins (or people I know ;) ) about that for the sake that I don't feel like getting a worse rep than I currently have on tip.it :roll:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:) :lol:

[Mercifull]

You know when you use the roll eyes smilie you lose all respect to an argument?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The reason why I said the one liner post was because it explained all. This is NOT the place to discuss 3rd party clients let alone SwitchShift which has its own forum offsite. There is no reason for it to be discussed on this forum and there are many other counter arguments such as a hack attack, DoS/DDoS on the SS site, someone implementing a logic bomb not to mention Jagex changing their stance every 5 minutes and only saying its currently not a bannable offence because of all the people crying about it. Jagex have the right at any point to implement a new rule which makes the use of the client illegal and against the rules, why should tipit have to do the policing of this?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you want to talk about SS and other 3rtd party clients find another website to do it on, it doesnt need to be discussed here and those who threaten to leave purely because of this probably arnt welcome her anyway.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

That a long enough post for you? And what does it matter what my post count is? I, and many others here, dont even look at it and certainly dont set my example based on post count. A high postcount is neither a mark of respect nor role model so you are the one who doesnt know what they are talking about.

[None2None]

You know when you use the roll eyes smilie you lose all respect to an argument?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The reason why I said the one liner post was because it explained all. This is NOT the place to discuss 3rd party clients let alone SwitchShift which has its own forum offsite. There is no reason for it to be discussed on this forum and there are many other counter arguments such as a hack attack, DoS/DDoS on the SS site, someone implementing a logic bomb not to mention Jagex changing their stance every 5 minutes and only saying its currently not a bannable offence because of all the people crying about it. Jagex have the right at any point to implement a new rule which makes the use of the client illegal and against the rules, why should tipit have to do the policing of this?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you want to talk about SS and other 3rtd party clients find another website to do it on, it doesnt need to be discussed here and those who threaten to leave purely because of this probably arnt welcome her anyway.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

That a long enough post for you? And what does it matter what my post count is? I, and many others here, dont even look at it and certainly dont set my example based on post count. A high postcount is neither a mark of respect nor role model so you are the one who doesnt know what they are talking about.

 

 

 

You began off-topic and are continuing to be, please read what is going on and what has been suggested before posted. Thanks. ;)

[Mercifull]

I have given quite clear reasons why the discussion of 3rd party clients including SS should not be allowed... how is that off topic?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

p.s theres no need to quote everything people say in each post, bad netiquette

[None2None]

As that may be true, the topic changed in the posts before yours to why tip.it shouldn't link to SS or the site and now is almost to the point of, why doesn't tip.it get people to make their own client (eg. me).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and alright, I wont quote ya :)

[Cruiser]

I'm done arguing the whole SS point. You obviously can't get it threw your head that is has not been allowed here for 6 years and that many in the community (including the staff) are very much against the issue. Constantly arguing it won't change the matter. cruiser's discussion on the matter>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I do want to reply to your link in this reply about sites that list hashes for searches.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You can search those websites all you like, and I can guarantee without a doubt you won't find the hash I posted on one of them. If by some chance you do, it won't be the correct string I encrypted simply due to the length and simple fact that storing enough keys to get to the string I used isn't practical, even for someone with multiple racks worth of storage.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just because websites exist to match hashes of dictionary words and simple 5 letter combos doesn't mean you will find a hash for every conceivable string I could have encrypted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On a final note, arguing with Merc is a bad idea. :P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'm done replying to the thread.

[None2None]

I'm done arguing the whole SS point. You obviously can't get it threw your head that is has not been allowed here for 6 years and that many in the community (including the staff) are very much against the issue. Constantly arguing it won't change the matter. cruiser's discussion on the matter>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I do want to reply to your link in this reply about sites that list hashes for searches.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You can search those websites all you like, and I can guarantee without a doubt you won't find the hash I posted on one of them. If by some chance you do, it won't be the correct string I encrypted simply due to the length and simple fact that storing enough keys to get to the string I used isn't practical, even for someone with multiple racks worth of storage.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just because websites exist to match hashes of dictionary words and simple 5 letter combos doesn't mean you will find a hash for every conceivable string I could have encrypted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On a final note, arguing with Merc is a bad idea. :P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'm done replying to the thread.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You obviously can't get it threw your head that is has not been allowed here for 6 years and that many in the community (including the staff) are very much against the issue.

 

 

 

through* my head? :roll:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OK then, lets say I cant find it, oh well, (Going back to the origional reason you stated that) I know many people who use short 6 letter passwords that equal out to a word that could be easily cracked, you are still very wrong on that argument, infact, an admin could crack passwords and I hope you'll get it through your thick skull that was even willing to go back in the past to argue a dropped point that it is possible, but not likely as I (as said before) assume your admins would never do that. All arguments aside, your way off topic.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And I wasn't exactly arguing with him, I was more telling him that he was off-topic (with the current stance), and if he wanted to reply to read the rest of the posts or at least the last few.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There was no logical reason for you to come back in and argue that point, now (as you said before) you are infact the one arguing the 'lost cause' or as I could say 'dropped point'.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I hope the next post ignores this one and the one above it. :)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PS - Why not use Loose's and Cruiser's RuneScript, add that to a client, and do that? Just saw it in his siggy... :|

[____]

His post was still within the confines of the thread - therefor: not off topic. Just because the active argument strayed somewhat doesn't make his posts any less valid.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And if you think it's a lost cause - why? You've hardly won; if anything it's a lost cause because you simply do not want to accept that after 6 years of ALL THIRD PARTY CLIENTS NOT BEING ALLOWED, tipit admins aren't suddenly going to allow it (for reasons Merc stated: Jagex changing their stance on them being legal/illegal all the time).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It's a lot easier for tipit admins just to ban all of them. If people want to find them; it's not exactly hard to find them. And besides that - wouldn't it make more sense to actually discuss said third party client in a place which actually developed it?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On the issue of Cruisers RuneScript; why? You've got the runescape window; if you need more stuff, open more browser windows. Hardly going to make a performance altering difference.

[Cruiser]

PS - Why not use Loose's and Cruiser's RuneScript, add that to a client, and do that? Just saw it in his siggy...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I know I said I'm done posting here but I just find it too funny that you'd drag the Rscript.org project into the thread.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you would bother reading the website, you would see it is not a third party client, but an IRC bot that pulls data from the high scores page and displays it to the IRC user or room, much like the html calculators Tip.It and other sites have. It's also already in use in the Tip.It IRC room.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RuneScript has nothing to do with third party clients and does not integrate itself with the game in any way, shape or form.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You're so busy trying to convince the staff to support third party clients and software that you're bring up things that don't even have anything to do with the discussion...

[Ks_Jeppe]

Let it die already will ya -.- This thread can be summed up by the md5 hash cruiser posted, thats really yea...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

bd89360bc55394cd9024cb866b58157d: Non2None_is_wrong (Yes, he typo'ed, but it was still breakable, just took an est. of 90 hours to do so... I had the liberty of knowing the string and limited my cracker to just the chars used, and broke it in 2 hours :P)

[None2None]

Let it die already will ya -.- This thread can be summed up by the md5 hash cruiser posted, thats really yea...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

bd89360bc55394cd9024cb866b58157d: Non2None_is_wrong (Yes, he typo'ed, but it was still breakable, just took an est. of 90 hours to do so... I had the liberty of knowing the string and limited my cracker to just the chars used, and broke it in 2 hours :P)

 

 

 

woohoo! I win...any replying back

 

 

 

 

PS - Why not use Loose's and Cruiser's RuneScript, add that to a client, and do that? Just saw it in his siggy...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I know I said I'm done posting here but I just find it too funny that you'd drag the Rscript.org project into the thread.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you would bother reading the website, you would see it is not a third party client, but an IRC bot that pulls data from the high scores page and displays it to the IRC user or room, much like the html calculators Tip.It and other sites have. It's also already in use in the Tip.It IRC room.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RuneScript has nothing to do with third party clients and does not integrate itself with the game in any way, shape or form.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You're so busy trying to convince the staff to support third party clients and software that you're bring up things that don't even have anything to do with the discussion...

 

 

 

And if you bothered to read my post to the extent that I read your website you'd see that I said:

 

 

 

PS - Why not use Loose's and Cruiser's RuneScript, add that to a client, and do that? Just saw it in his siggy...

 

 

 

:roll:

[Cruiser]

woohoo! I win...any replying back

 

 

 

I had a nice reply typed up for that, but you just aren't worth the effort anymore. Call it a cop out if you want, I just don't care about the worthless points you've made anymore. Anyone with any logic can probably figure out why.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And if you bothered to read my post to the extent that I read your website you'd see that I said:

 

 

 

PS - Why not use Loose's and Cruiser's RuneScript, add that to a client, and do that? Just saw it in his siggy...

 

 

 

:roll:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There's that stupid roll eyes smiley again, like you're somehow right.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is an IRC bot. It can't be integrated into a client in it's current state. Rewriting it to do so would be a massive waste of time and a huge resource hog because of the code involved. There are much, much better ways to add a skill calc to your precious clients.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It isn't a third party client (and I wish I could smack you for suggesting it be added to one), but you decided to drag it into the mess anyway. Dragging a project I helped create into this argument was worthless on your part. It has nothing to do with the topic at hand, you obviously have no clue why, but are trying to make a point out of it anyway. Trying to pass it off as something Tip.It can add to a client adds nothing to your point (especially when many of the staff already know it capabilities and it's developers) and just goes to show you don't really know wth you're doing at this point.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This thread is so full of crap now I'm just going to drop it and walk away (like I was going to before someone decided to drag my project into it for no reason). Arguing the SS point, as always, has resulted in a thread full of worthless arguments (from both sides, including me).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Any more replys aimed at me will go unanswered, regardless of content. The thread needs to either be locked, or let fall into the depths by all of us.

[None2None]

 

woohoo! I win...any replying back

 

 

 

I had a nice reply typed up for that, but you just aren't worth the effort anymore. Call it a cop out if you want, I just don't care about the worthless points you've made anymore. Anyone with any logic can probably figure out why.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And if you bothered to read my post to the extent that I read your website you'd see that I said:

 

 

 

PS - Why not use Loose's and Cruiser's RuneScript, add that to a client, and do that? Just saw it in his siggy...

 

 

 

:roll:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There's that stupid roll eyes smiley again, like you're somehow right.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is an IRC bot. It can't be integrated into a client in it's current state. Rewriting it to do so would be a massive waste of time and a huge resource hog because of the code involved. There are much, much better ways to add a skill calc to your precious clients.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It isn't a third party client (and I wish I could smack you for suggesting it be added to one), but you decided to drag it into the mess anyway. Dragging a project I helped create into this argument was worthless on your part. It has nothing to do with the topic at hand, you obviously have no clue why, but are trying to make a point out of it anyway. Trying to pass it off as something Tip.It can add to a client adds nothing to your point (especially when many of the staff already know it capabilities and it's developers) and just goes to show you don't really know wth you're doing at this point.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This thread is so full of crap now I'm just going to drop it and walk away (like I was going to before someone decided to drag my project into it for no reason). Arguing the SS point, as always, has resulted in a thread full of worthless arguments (from both sides, including me).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Any more replys aimed at me will go unanswered, regardless of content. The thread needs to either be locked, or let fall into the depths by all of us.

As you said. In it's current state...the methods and calculations you used to make your calculators can, infact, be translated into java...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And believe me, I'm not inexperienced in Java. I know that it is totally possible.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I still dont see where I called your program a third party client, infact, I said it would be nice to add your program's functions into a client, I dont know if I worded that wrong or if you misinterpreted it. It was meant to be a compliment, take it how you will though... :roll:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I think you missed a few lines in each of my posts...

[____]

Less use of the :roll: smiley and you might be able to walk away from this topic sounding less of a stubbon moron than you really are - but at your current rate; that isn't going to happen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In regards to the bot: THERE IS NO POINT. You've already got everything you need on the tipit website; what possible benifit could you get from dumping all of into a client?

[None2None]

Less use of the :roll: smiley and you might be able to walk away from this topic sounding less of a stubbon moron than you really are - but at your current rate; that isn't going to happen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In regards to the bot: THERE IS NO POINT. You've already got everything you need on the tipit website; what possible benifit could you get from dumping all of into a client?

Not having to have a separate window up? having it all in one?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Why do people use SS? the answer is simple, it's easier with all-in-one as opposed to having to have 2 windows up, one of them (tip.it) you'd have to navigate through every time. I think everyone can understand that.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And I use the :roll: smily in situations in which I would have rolled my eyes, what really might bring your argument down is name calling, great job. ;)

[The Observer]

I want this to be clean. Don't flame. :?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Swift Switch has now been considered "legal". So i don't know why it shouldn't be unbanned.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Atm i am not going to allow it. I do not wish to upset the coders of SS at all but as someone said earlier we do not support 3rd software etc. Main problem that we are looking at is , yes, it is legal atm, but will it be tomorrow.. or next week.. if we allow it and then becomes illegal again, we would have to stop our users from posting with it etc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HOWEVER

 

 

 

It is still in talks between Admins here and well we undecided on this issue at present. Its mainly down to the fact of what Jagex does and then how it effects SS but also cause it is a download and then could be a security risk to our users. It would be nice to be able to allow , it sure would cut soem work down here but we have to weigh up the pros and cons to this SS before we can give you a out right answer on this. Hopefully in a few days time, I will be able to.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You don't have to support it. But you can just make it so you discussion about it isn't really banned per say. Strider made a whole bunch of fixes to make it legal and its completely safe. Its rated green by siteadvisor... But if your talking about hackers and stuff like that then just use a firewall and virus protecter.

[None2None]

gah...sorry for the flame, offtopicness, and arguments dude =\ ...I thought you had just dropped the subject...guess not. >.< #-o

[____]

Not having to have a separate window up? having it all in one?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Why do people use SS? the answer is simple, it's easier with all-in-one as opposed to having to have 2 windows up, one of them (tip.it) you'd have to navigate through every time. I think everyone can understand that.

Sounds a little bit cluttered if everything is on the screen at once, the RS client itself takes up a heap of room, I can't imagine how you get skill calcs, and whatever else on there screen in one hit. Might be all in one client yes - but is it all open AT THE SAME TIME?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If no, refer to the use of a web browser and website for the answer, no difference.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And I use the :roll: smily in situations in which I would have rolled my eyes, what really might bring your argument down is name calling, great job. ;)

Seems like "name calling" as you put it failed. The use of the :roll: comes across as being stubbon, and your arguments aren't exactly grand either, so I stand by my decission to say your excessive use of the :roll: makes you come across as a "stubbon moron".

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. Because you don't seem willing to step back from the "omg SS owns every possible alternative" attitude you apparently radiate.

 

 

 

2. You come off as imature due to the above.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*shrug*

[Looce]

Kay, so I changed my sig today, and looked for a post of my own to see the sig in context. Found this thread again, and will raise some points.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First off, the thread has gone off-topic. It should be about unbanning the discussion of SwiftSwitch in Tip.it Forums, and it evolved into a discussion of third-party clients in and of themselves, and a possibility that Tip.it might integrate a third-party client into their website...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To None2None: Don't drag RuneScript into this. Even though, by a coincidence, RuneScript started its existence in Chat-Addict, old Tip.it IRC, you should not create any pseudo-affiliation between us. And even if it was straightforward to take some of my Java RuneScript modules [forum.rscript.org] and integrate them into a third-party client, neither Cruiser, nor micksam7, spling or I, would approve of that use of the code.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Though, I must say, with the proper permissions and a java.lang.SecurityManager [java.sun.com] installed, the code could not run amok and delete files, or keylog you etc. More technical information may be found here [java.sun.com] (see the descriptions for AWTPermission, FilePermission and AudioPermission), but I won't elaborate further in this post.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Summary of this post: RuneScript != Tip.it, RuneScript != Third party client :P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P.-S.: Check this post [forum.tip.it] and post Agree/Disagree on what it says perhaps. It's my idea of what the rule should become on the Forums.