i did a new manip, with less of the new feel, heh. just wanted to share =)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

comments and rates welcome, not particualy bothered on CC, but i wont just ignor it if theres something really bugging you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PJB21

nice use of glare in the hand it could be a little brighter lol sorry for the downside remark O:)

i considered making it brighter, but then i didnt want it to be the total center of attention, theres far more to it than just a glow.

It's too blurry, and that mottled pattern doesn't work very well.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not bad, but could do with some adjectments.

Love it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

'Nuff said.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lol,you know me. I love your work.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is that you? I like the glare, the pictures colours are like... dull,which I like.

greyscale and sepia used, only greys and low sat browns =)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

yes tis be me. but its my choice and i covered the identity.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:anxious:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

dont lock :pray:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PJB21

Wont lock it, eyes are censored.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I like it, colors and the effects make this manip look good.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I dont really like the text, looks like it is cut off (that can be the meaning of the font) but it doesnt really fit in here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What is that ball below the manip? have you made that yourself?

I totally and utterly disagree, the color and effects make it look low quality and like crap. And the text color/style choice is just horendous.

Hmm... makes it look a bit like a chalk/charcoal drawing to me.

woopi:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

im not to sure on the text myself (both fonts) but i cba to change it...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

the ball below the manip? do you mean in my hand? if so yes, thats 3 circular gradients with transparent used as a colour =)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

jacob:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

each to their own i guess, im just not really a fan of new and shiney, i prefer old and decayed (tis orgasmic =9) but yeah, your welcome to your own opinion =)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

skully:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

i guess it does abit, didnt really have that in mind while making it but yeah, tis cool either way

 

 

 

_____________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

hmm, looking at it now, im not to sure about the censor strip, it doesnt quite fit in, needs more distortion. hmm, will probably never get round to changing it, as with most of my stuff, i do it for fun, not perfection :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

however i can be quite a perfectionist at times, ive come to the conclusion most artists are.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PJB21

Why post your work if you won't take advice then? You simply want us to smooch your behind, pat your shoulder, and tell you how wonderful it is? No, that won't happen. Little known fact, art can suck.

why the attack?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

i said your entitled to your own opinion, if thats not liking my work then so be it, im not saying you have to. i personaly like this style.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

i dont mind CC on whats happening, or suggestions of how to improve. the thing i dont like is critisism of the style.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PJB21

I don't really like the setup of the photo mostly with the cloth behind you and the hand being a bit too close to the camera along with the hair on the top of your bush(or hair, or head) standing up a bit. i don't really thing the charcoal grainy look fits too well.The top has room to be cropped. The ball thing(no idea what you want to to be) could be have greater oplicity and be deleted in front of the front finger. I read your response to the other person that said this but I don't know why you would not want to have a center of attention. Removing the saturation is overused a lot and it doesn't fit too well in this.