flipflop121

Yes it does, just in the same way that genocide denial of historically accepted genocides almost undoubtedly means that you're a racist. You have no reason to deny a certain genocide when the facts are plainly obvious...except that you have an underlying dislike for the race that was victimized. See: David Irving. It has nothing to do with the denial of facts? where did you pull this ridiculous analogy from? i deny gay marriage because i believe that Christian marriage is a religious practice. there is "facts per say" condonning the joining of two men / women in holy matromony so does that make you the bigot and denier of the sacredy of marriage and therefore a denier of the holocaust. what a bigot you are Mr Mage No, marriage ceremonies are "done" in a church in front of a priest, if the couple so chooses. The actual marriage happens in a courthouse, like when my friend Hali was married. There was no ceremony, they were married by a judge. The joining of men and women has always been of religious value, while it has changed in recent times and is now sometimes seen as a formality it is still in its essence the joining of two people under christ. Not legally. The church doesn't have to accept their marriage, the state does. Is religious doctrine law? The law is based off of the religious doctrine. so yea, the basis of it is. And? your merely discriminating against the church and being a bigot. No it's not. The churches aren't forced to perform marriage ceremonies. read above concerning the origins of marriage etc etc Separate but equal has already been thrown down, champ. I do not see the point behind being separate but equal not being accepted. So you just don't like gay people because....? At least the religious folk have a ridiculous dogma to try and justify their bigotry. I never said i dont like gay people, please dont try to fill in gaps to discredit my information based on assumptions on your part. i have no problems with gay people and have a few that i call friends. i just believe marriage should be between a man and women as it has it ties to the church and these ties should be respected as customs and beliefs of the church. rather then hatred for the gay community. and why do you hate religious folks so much? at least gay people have a reason to justify their bigotry towards the church. What? was in regards to attempting to make a religious ideal fit around a different ideal that goes against the beliefs of religion. Uh...you clearly don't have any understanding of the issue at hand. I think you will find that is the issue at hand. Gay people want equal rights, Religious people want to protect there beliefs... not an overly difficult subject, perhaps you forgot to remember that and just decided to run around and calling all opposed to you a bigot? Separate but equal. Do you have an issue with black people having the same water fountains, but lawfully they can't be used by white people? no, both people get the same use of the water fountain, one calls it a bubbeler the other a water fountain. who gives a flying [bleep] what its called to be perfectly honest. No, they're civil rights advocates, arguing against injustices about bigots like yourself. No i think you will find they are religious hateing people who want to command the government to change law based upon what they consider to be right and in case cause people to loose a certain part of their religion that they believe to be truthfull and holy because of these people. i call that discrimination and as such i believe you are in fact, a bigot (bigot really is the new black isnt it)

simply stating your opposed to gay marriage does not make you a homophobe. it simply means your opposed to the idea. Marriage is a religious institution. there is a reason its done in a church with a priest. its the joining of two people (man and women) under a religious connection. if that religion has decided that it does not accept the decision to wed two people of the same sex, i cant see how it is an issue. Religious doctrine (catholisism) states marriage is between man and women. so to be married under Christian values and to be of two of the same sex would be seen as going against the churches wishes. Im all for equal rights, but to say homosexual people should have the right to be married under christian values is discriminating against the church. A Civil Union would eliminate this if the union did in turn offer the same amount of options and legal abilities that married people had. I do not agree with catholisism, im an Athiest. but the fact is the entire idea of this is trying to make a pentagon fit into a square shape. it wont work. Gay people want the church to change their beliefs so that they can get equal rights. see how this just wont work? Change it to the civil union, make the Civil Union give them the same rights as Marriage and i honestly cannot see the problem with it. by claiming that gay people have every right to be lawfully married is being a religious bigot.

Cant believe Jack Churchill hasnt been mentioned yet. this guy was just a freak and absolutly awesome

Boy: Ares or james girl: dont care

Thanks for continueing this guys, and also for posting the link for bestactever... i 4got to add that i really do hope Sir rick does go to the awards, and performs live. honestly what could be better then that? and if you record it on your tv then u can rick roll your friends on the TV as well =] think of the possibilities

lolz, i love in the video when the women on the right says that its an elitest liberal magazine... did i just miss something or is sarah palin not part of the repulibcan party, well known for their elitism? and honestly who gives a fly [bleep], its a photo, she (obviously) has make up on, the whole point was that she is "foksie" who cares?

im doing my hsc through tafe. its a really great way to do it =] im doing my hsc over 18 months and have already fully completed my maths module and scored 94 on it (will prolly get lowered down to 93-91 but hey its out of the way =] ) i finished my physics and chem modules scoring 87 and 92 respectivly (not sure what they scale to) and iv got english and modern history left, both of which after 50% of em being done are sitting at around 90-92% so as long as i dont screw them up, it should be a good UAI for me then its off to a buisness / arts degree through the army studying at canberra

i know, which makes voting for rick astley even more important

while this may not seem like a good topic or even an interesting one to alot of you. there can be great justice achieved Weve been Rickrolled! Over twenty years after his hit single went to No. 1 in 16 countries, 80s pop star Rick Astley has been nominated in the category Best Act Ever as his fans take his hit single Never Gonna Give You Up literally and flock to write-in his name as a nominee. Rick Astley in his first ever nomination in the history of the MTV Europe Music Awards will compete against Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, Green Day, Tokio Hotel and U2 for Best Act Ever. The finalists in the Video Star category were also revealed today as selected by MTV - with Madonna receiving her only EMA nomination this year for 4 Minutes. She is battling for the Award against 30 Seconds to Mars, Santogold, Snoop Dogg and Weezer. Here are all the nominees for Best Act Ever and Video Star: Best Act Ever: Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, Green Day, Rick Astley, Tokio Hotel, U2 Video Star: 30 Seconds to Mars A Beautiful Lie; Madonna feat. Justin Timberlake 4 Minutes; Santogold L.E.S. Artistes; Snoop Dogg Sensual Seduction; Weezer Pork and Beans. Vote now to determine who will win in Best Act Ever and watch on 6 November to see who MTV chose for Video Star. thats right people, rick astley is in the nominations for best act ever http://ema.mtv.co.uk/vote/ ^link for the voteing options. vote for rick, think of the great justice

Well at the moment i have a few options in front of me. will list in preference option a) get accepted into the army, and do my bachelor of buisness / arts degree majoring in economics and political science. work in the army for another 5 years (mandatory) and come out at the age of 28 with a very nice bank balance. then move back into civilan life and start to work my way into federal politics and hopefully secure my self a place in the senate / house of reps and continue working from there. option B) do a bachelor of commerce / law at my local university, and get a part-time job in a firm of somekind doing paperwork etc to pay for uni. join a solicitor firm straight out of uni and study political science at nights. then eventually move into the political foray and follow option a. option c) do a bachelor of buisness / commerce, major in accounting, join an accounting firm and stick with that. get into local/state politics and see if i can shuffle my way through that

congratz eni

free BUMP

as Randal Graves once put it. "What's the point in having an Internet connection if you're not using it to look up weird, [bleep]ed-up pictures of dirty sex you'll never have yourself?"

:o

get on runescape. im bored