caligula101

Ok shutup kid. The reason we don't go to war with Cuba is because they have no black gold a.k.a oil. Prior to the war Bush's main reason for going to war with Iraq was that they had weapons of mass destruction. When this was proved inconclusive he fell back on the line "But he was evil", like that gives the right for him to kill thousands of innocent Iraqi's. Shutup and get your facts straight before you flame someone.

Ummmm sell them on ebay?

Firstly you should learn to use the quote button correctly. Secondly we're talking about the Iraq war, now as far as I know Iraq didn't bomb the twin towers. They didn't have weapons of mass destruction either.You defied the UN because they were right, there was no need to go to war, but Americans can never be wrong... Thirdly don't be racist to people that are different to you. I could call you a straw chomping hillbilly named Cleetus but i'm not going to as that would be sterotyping you as a Bush follower.

What's that supposed to mean!?

Rofl. That boy is seriously annoying, it makes me cringe at his repetitive singing "They're gonna taste great", I mean who sings like that on their way to breakfast?

Alton Towers is great if you enjoy being stung by wasps, McDonalds type food and candy floss that is ever so sticky. Bad experience of theme parks, please don't ask

I'm fed up of trying to steer this debate in the way I want it to so i'm not going to try anymore. My idea seems to have fallen upon deaf ears,that and idiotic ones. Continue your debate about abstinence, some good points made by IceNomad.

If your main account was banned from rs would you start playing again? Or would you just quit? The reason I make this is because my main was banned a few monthes ago so I started playing on my pure, leveling him up again, but would you bother? Here are your options: A) Level on your pure, get your stats up and continue playing full time B) Only play part time for pking etc C) Quit runescape completely and never return D) Other, please state though :D

Life is life is life.

I've shown you my suggestion Fubai, you seem to think that we have money therefore we should waste it. You act like the money could be spent on nothing else other than wellfare. You act like there is not a problem with the amount of underage pregnancies currently in Britain. I think it is you that cannot open your eyes and see the world as it is today. Perhaps you should leave your sheltered life and go discover things instead of making up evidence to support your claims. My suggestion would be the most effective and would stop them from breeding, if you don't like it, tough.

Hmm goodluck with that, you know by the end of it all you'll be doing this right>> :wall: ^^lol seriously good luck man

Hmm, good luck.

1. I don't read the sun, perhaps you ignored the fact that I cycle past council estates on my way to college every day? First hand experience. 2. You ignore basic facts such as how much money we're spending on this area of wellfare. 3. You seem unaware of the fact these people do not work and many do not contribute to society. Abortion is not killing, I proved this earlier on, perhaps you need reading lessons 4. You're a pompous moron.

Really? As much as 18 years of wellfare support? :roll: No they kill off another lay about that do nothing for the state other than suck up all it's money. No, they won't get pregnant when they see the consequences. Don't make me out to be some psychologically damaged person, desperate times cause for desperate measures.

People attack America because what they have done is wrong. It's not because it's "fashionable", war isn't a piece of clothing. About the other nations going to war(Britain etc) , there would have been no war had America not gone to war so I don't know what this is about, siding the blame onto the europeans? Not only do Americans outnumber all the nations put together (in Iraq) but they were the first to declare war. There is alot wrong with your philosphy of "if somethings popular it must be wrong". If I go out and murder a person i'm going to be very unpopular with the public, I suppose that makes what i did right? According to your philosphy it must do.

I can only assume you're on a non-stop mescaline high to draw conclusions like that. I'm neither agreeing nor disagreeing with your proposal but you are severely delusional if you think there would be any public support. When I refer to the public I mean those that are educated. For example people on this site seem quite intelligent and I have had mainly support for my idea. I don't expect it to be popular with these kind of people but it is the best suggestion to stop them reproducing.

Abortion is legal and it isn't technically killing, as the foetus is not actually alive. Therefore forcing them to have an abortion is a perfectly apt solution as it isn't illegal, it would probably be met with strong public support. The public seem to be getting tired of the amount of money being given to these people for (as someone earlier said) 18 years of their life and we get nothing out of it! These ignorant young mothers raise their children to end up very similar to their parents (which is often the case with us all), who then get pregnant at a young age and we have more of a problem. That they keep reproducing!

There was a topic a while back about the wellfare system, however I want to look at a certain aspect of it and that is the amount of money being pumped into stupid young girls that get themselves pregnant. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edi ... 764417.stm Some interesting quotes from that article "11 year old impregnated" "mother proud of her daughter" "girl smokes 20 cigarettes a day" Around where I live whenever I cycle to college I cycle past an area of town where these kind of people dwell. I see lots of teenage mothers walking around and it irritates me to think that they go out (at taxpayers expense) and get themselves pregnant and live their lives on benefits. For example I saw this one girl about my age (16) and she already had a child running around her as well as the fact she was pregnant with another one. They go and reproduce more hooligans to terroise the country that I live in and i'm sick of it. Literally hundreds of millions of pounds are given to these people for them to waste and I think it should be cut down. There are so many other things that the money could be spent on to help others that need it, not wasting it on people that will throw it back in our face by reproducing more kids. Perhaps only people that live in the U.K can relate to what i'm saying, perhaps not... A solution to this would be to force all women/girls under the age of 18 that become pregnant to have an abortion. It would save the country more money to spend on the people that genuinelly need help. Any thoughts on underage pregnancies or idea's of what action could be taken?

Wow he hits you if you yell at him? Dude I might hit you if you came up to me and started yelling at me :lol: Hmm well I guess he was just stupid...

Well America go to war with anyone that don't fit into their ideology of der-moc-racy. They most of the time ignore the UN and are about as predictable as a cannon. I think by far they're the most dangerous, what we need is another wall street crash to stop them from creating more wars...

Well you don't know that it didn't have anything to do with his nationality, things are taught in different ways in other countries. As well as the fact english probably wasn't his first language. Perhaps your parents should pack you off to Turkey to see how you get along there...

Link is da king! I always win with link and his sword dash :ohnoes:

The poll is there to decide what the majority want, you can look at that poll anyway you like however lets look at the facts. More people want it to stay as it is while less people want it changed. The admins should do what the majority want as a)that's what the poll is there for b)if they make a decision that isn't popular, they'll be in trouble. You can look at it in the way you think, more people want it changed than those that are for it? Well that would be wrong. General elections, if the winner gets 40% and the remaining two parties both get 30% they don't let the other two parties remain in power and share a joint leadership because they have a bigger majority when combined, no the party with 40% gets office.

Exactly. Postcount reflects how long you have been here. You guys keep saying how hard the mods here work. Then you say there is loads of spam on the board. They both seem to contradict eachother. The same reason that you seem to know that spamming is a problem here. Can I ask you then what is the critical element of this forum?

Sorry? What is this entire post you've made, I believe it is in your own opinion. Dunno what you mean by that statement you're saying i'm not allowed to express my own opinion because I think differently to you? This poll was made for a reason :roll: The mod position is voluntary buddy, you're not forced to become one. I believe you can quit at anytime. You seem to overestimate the amount of spam here. You also didn't address my point on how removing the postcount would increase the amount of spam. Human beings need something to aim for. If you really want tipit to become something like the rs boards then removing postcounts would be a good way to start. Yes playing longer makes you more knowledgable I never said otherwise. Having 7k posts doesn't make you any more knowledgable than a person with 20 post count but it makes you more trustable. You've been on this site longer than them and you have posted more than them. Posted! It's a forum, you're meant to post, you take away a postcount and the forum becomes completely redudant. It's like stealing the wheels from a bike and still expecting somebody to have as much fun with it as before. Then you'd be banned pretty quickly. Stop having this thoughts that removing postcounts would decrease spam. It wouldn't work and the forum would go down the drain...