Celt23

Woot, thanks for this fantastic piece of entertainment. :D I found the Runescape one to be the most interesting... http://www.almenconi.com/reviews.php?art_id=591 I guess the person who wrote that is a bonehead. :)

I guess they are using that oil money on fantastic resorts? I want muh private island. Wonder how much a house on one of those man-made archipelagos costs.

This thread isn't a war, you can only expect a few negative comments in a debate. Besides, this thread was meant to be a Religion vs Whatever thread, look at the title. :)

You got to think about these guys: If there is other life out there then that disproves alot of what was said in the Bible, AND disproves the universe is 6000 years old, it would of taken alot longer to develop this kind of technology; perhaps millions or, if these little dudes are travelling galaxies or hopping universes, BILLIONS of years.

IE7 It's the best browser yet. I just wish it supported more file formats, like MNG. (moving network graphics, png-like format designed to replace animated GIFs)

He totally overexaggerated. I can't believe he doesn't know that no two expirements will produce similar results. Like I said before, it's like chiseling a rock while singing rap and saying it produces better-looking results than chiseling it while singing rock.

Who, Masaru Emoto? Or are you resorting to petty attacks? Yes, it just looks like he's hallucinating. I was never reffering to you... Read the edit in the above post will yeh.

Anyone can take drugs. Looks like this poor fellow is one of them.

Ugh. I'm not saying there's evidence that Zeus exists. I'm saying that there's no possible way to ever say he doesn't exist. We can't ever know everything, especially not when it comes to supernatural debates. "You're on drugs". Cute. Anyways, did you even read the whole thing? I mean, it's practically impossible to not at least think there's something out there based on that data. What, are you some rebellious teenage atheist who's had too much "God" in her life from church, family and school? You seem stubborn to the extent of not even daring to look into the reasons why people believe in a God. It's like you're afraid to be proven wrong (not that I'm saying what I believe is 100% fact, it's no where close). 1) Evidence it's impossible to prove? Whenever I call Zeus I get dropped. 2) He shouldn't be writing these books and being so serious on these hallucinations, and go get some phsychiatric help. 3)I read it and wasn't impressed. That's like saying singing rap while randomly chiseling a rock will produce more impressive results than singing rock while chiseling it. To the next sentance, no. I don't believe in God for the same reason I don't believe in Zeus, Osiris or Allah. I can go look up some data as to "why people believe in God". EDIT - Found some good data.

1) For all you know, neither cameras nor the human eye could detect Zeus and the other gods. We don't "know" that they don't exist, we just assume that based on modern science. 2) When I say "gods" I'm not talking about Roman and Greek beliefs, but the possibility that if there's a chance there's some kind of a "God", there could be an equal chance that it's actually "gods". 3) http://www.cygnus-books.co.uk/features/ ... -emoto.htm Read it. If you don't believe in some form of a god by the end of that, well, then you're too stubborn to even listen to those who believe in one, i.e. a lost cause. It seems like it too, the way you go on about, "I ain't believing in God unless you basterds give me a mountain and a half of evidence." Maybe I should just make a thread about it rather than reposting is to this extent... 1) Exactly, we can't figure out something and we say it's divine. Then we understand it. Then we reach another frontier of understanding and say it's divine. Repeat. 2)I'd like some evidence that there's even any gods at all. 3) That's what happens when you take drugs. That also has no evidence in it on the existenence of god(s). Only overreacting on the fact that no two expirements will produce similar results.

Faith is blind. It isn't evidence- it's hope. If you've ever read the Bible, blind stupid faith almost killed Isaac, for one thing. Also, there really isn't evidence against a God existing- if anything there's plenty (including scientific data) for it. There is evidence though for debating against man made Gods, such as the Christian God, and arguing against what man pictured Him as. Again, arguing against one view of a God of a small section of mankind is not the same as arguing the existence of a God (or gods, maybe) in general. There's also scientific evidence of Zeus sitting ontop of Mount Olympus (photos and scientific expeditions). You can see him, he's around pixel x432 y321, along with Hera, Pan and Apollo. They are eating supper. Point: We know Zeus isn't sitting on Olympus zapping people with his lightning bolt and causing storms when you tick him off. Soon we should know that the idea of God (unless he decides to show 'imself) is rediculous. I'd like some hard, REAL proof that God exists.

I had the same experience. Smeared across a wall in the cubical. Filthy [bleep]. :x The stuff is still in the toilet whenever I use their restrooms.

:o I need to keep that one in mind.

Probably take a few days or a week. GL, Barnes and Noble is great.

If you're going to BS your image, you could at least BS the specs correctly. The supercomputer posted supports up to 512 nodes with 128gb of RAM each (Google the model on the rack doors, you'll find it). That totals 64 tb, not quite 750. It also only uses a 1.9ghz processor in each of its (up to) 512 nodes. Each node is 16 processors. 512 * 16 = 8192 Ghz (still only 8^12, way off 1000^23). The Ghz math is wrong anyways since Ghz don't just multiple out by adding chips. :P You can all safely ignore him. :lol: Okay so I overexaggerated. That thing costed me a a fortune. I didn't want a wimpy little Dell or Gateway so I got the biggest, meanest looking one I could find. It plays great with runescape.

Mmmmm, deliciousness for a buck. Sounds reasonable to me. But the fact that they were 20-30 cents if I can remember right :-k Why would they double in price when we still get the same amount of ice cream? Its called inflation! Oh-Em-Gee! Condemn McDonalds, I really liked the IrÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâó and chemical 78%26# in their icecream.

^You have some bad luck with Mc-D's.

Awefully short list, mine isn't on there. Although I'm 100% sure what mine means.

Ask them to turn off the filter while you get what you need?

750 terrabyte RAM, 1000ÃÆââ¬Å¡ÃâòÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâó GHz processer, all the works.

The colossus of Rhodes pwns all. Really quite a shame it got destroyed.

To dispell all the "prove humans evolved from single-celled organisms":

This is the way these things work: Software doesn't just appear on the shelves by magic. That program shrink-wrapped inside the box along with the indecipherable manual and 12-paragraph disclaimer notice actually came to you by way of an elaborate path, through the most rigid quality control on the planet. Here, shared for the first time with the general public, are the inside details of the program development cycle. Programmer produces code he believes is bug-free. Product is tested. 20 bugs are found. Programmer fixes 10 of the bugs and explains to the testing department that the other 10 aren't really bugs. Testing department finds that five of the fixes didn't work and discovers 15 new bugs. See 3. See 4. See 5. See 6. See 7. See 8. Due to marketing pressure and an extremely pre-mature product announcement based on overly-optimistic programming schedule, the product is released. Users find 137 new bugs. Original programmer, having cashed his royalty check, is nowhere to be found. Newly-assembled programming team fixes almost all of the 137 bugs, but introduce 456 new ones. Original programmer sends underpaid testing department a postcard from Fiji. Entire testing department quits. Company is bought in a hostile takeover by competitor using profits from their latest release, which had 783 bugs. New CEO is brought in by board of directors. He hires programmer to redo program from scratch. Programmer produces code he believes is bug-free.... Just replace 'program' with RuneScape feature and take out the new CEO part.

That's a great idea, I lost my old full forester from a troll shark fishing a while ago.

Can't wait for it anyway. Those are some pwnage novels, I think this one's going to be far beyond excellent.