Range_This11

I've lost 30 pounds and all I did was eat healthier and cycle every other day for 5-10 miles. It's quite easy. All that you need is willpower.

If I had a choice, I would choose to drink much better beer, but unfortunately all that is provided is crappy "light" beer. It's more about quantity than quality. You'd understand if you've ever had a Natural Light.

RS weed must be some danks.

Well if you don't play with that rule then you aren't worried about the other team getting two in the same cup, and it would happen a lot more. Since we do play with that rule as soon as the first ball makes it in you have to be quick and snatch it before the next person throws. Ohhhhh I understand...you play pull ball. We leave it in there so the other ball tends to bounce off the other instead of actually going in.

I don't understand the "same cup and you win" rule. That's absolutely ridiculous...that happens usually at least twice a game for me :mellow:

Here's my apartment's rules: First of all, we play water pong, much more sanitary. Just drink your own drink when they sink. Games go faster, and it's more fun. 10 cups, ONE re-rack, cannot re-rack in the middle of the turn (ie, when you get balls back), Honeycomb/circle of death means nothing. Throw=1 cup , Bounce=2 cups, Same cup both thrown=3 cups+balls back, Same cup 1 bounce 1 throw=4 cups+bb, Same cup both bounce=5 cups+bb Bounces may be swatted. Girls blow, guys finger Rebuttal is allowed as long as the cups made do not exceed cups left by winning team (ie, if you have 2 cups left and you both make the same cup, it's game over) Losing team throws until they miss during rebuttal Overtime: 3 cups, triangle rack, no rebuttal. Center cup is the "Helen Keller cup". Anyone deaf, dumb, and blind could hit that cup. Also referred to as the "freshman cup". Finally....NBA JAM RULES! 2 cups in a row by one player and they are "heeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaattttinnn' up!" but the player must be "called in" by his or her teammate. 3 cups in a row and said person is "on fire" (again must be called in by teammate) and shoots until he or she misses. My record with my roommate is 13 games in a row winning. The streak was only broken because our landlord showed up haha.

It got boring because it was around 2 and a half hours. That was way too long for that plot, way too long. But the 3D was awesome, I usually hate everything in 3D but I absolutely loved the experience. Graphics were great too.

A boring, too long, massive allegory jammed down my throat. The only thing that was really good about the movie was the 3D. Everything else was just average.

Easily the 5 minute log-timer. This changes the way we play so much more than a content update.

You're not using any argument I had. I agree with Qeltar completely.

I already argued this point. Why don't you read through the topic. Qeltar started posting because another poster and I were getting into it over some bs economic term. Then you called him out. Now I'm laughing.

I just want the free laptop haha.

Your "arguments" make me want to kill myself :( Sorry you don't agree with me, buddy. You don't have to agree or disagree with someone to think their argument is complete garbage. Not only did the fact that the person put arguments in quotes, leading me to believe they don't agree with them, and the fact they make such a rash statement leads me to believe that they don't like my arguments because they don't agree with me. But, you are correct, you can agree/disagree and still don't like the argument presented. However, the burden of proof is on you, not me. Show me why you don't like my statements. You're doing a well enough job making an [wagon] out of yourself as it is :) I'll leave it as is. Keep on keepin' on, dude.

Your "arguments" make me want to kill myself :( Sorry you don't agree with me, buddy. You don't have to agree or disagree with someone to think their argument is complete garbage.

Your "arguments" make me want to kill myself :(

Wow, yeah you're totally right! I know when I took my required ECON 201 (yes, 201, not 101) course this semester "bang for your buck" was one of the terms! The term "bang for your buck" does not include looks. That phrase means getting the most performance for your money. Performance has absolutely nothing to do with looks. Performance is performance. My point is that I laugh at people that pay loads of money for an item that, in the case of d platelegs, does not perform any better.

I hate 3D movies, but I guess I'd see it if it wasn't.

Except platelegs don't have any extra perks. Aside from the opinion that they somehow "look better". I laugh at scapers that pay loads of money for gear that's not worth how much they pay. It's all about bang for your buck.

There was a pretty big topic on this a couple of months ago. It's dead now.

I don't agree with this at all. Platelegs just look better. Plain and simple. It's not that anyone is afraid they're going to get ridiculed someone over an internet game for being "gay". It's just that a skirt doesn't look as cool as platelegs do.

We mined for a few days. That's the most I've talked to you, but it was sweet. Nice job on the stats :)

It's easy to live without it if you played for years before it came out. I was anti-summoning for a very long time, even got 90 Slayer without it using Guthan's. It's all in how you play the game.

Honestly, don't really care. I have never been interested in merchanting in my entire career. As long as prices aren't extremely outrageous, I'm fine with it.

It's debatable, in my opinion, that Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas should be the best rated GTA game, but JESUS why did they put GTA: IV above San Andreas? That game was absolute garbage and a sacrilege to the GTA series.

All in the Family will never be topped as the greatest sitcom of all time. No chance.