Omar

They can't, Duff, but they'll ask you if you've ever tried it and remind you, in case you're lying, that you could have after-effects at a critical moment.

Seems valid to me.

Did you end up trying high doses of acid? I'm interested in giving small doses of shrooms or acid a try.

Roots rock/pop? You're probably not going to find anything similar, but you'd do well to grab the album.

Some might say that in the name of multiculturalism, minority groups can sometimes oppress the majority to the point where the idea of multiculturalism is threatened. For example, some argue women wearing burqas are a violation of their own cultural code of conduct: they would say the minority's culture is prevailing over their own.

I keep imagining you as the guy in your avatar. It's so disconcerting... This is how I always imagined Omar: Haha joking, of course, but I just remember that picture of your afro. I was disturbed by how close you got for a second. Also, the Beckett picture is a reference but I'm not convinced anyone got it. Don't ask me to explain, it's a secret.

And that is why I always put my liquor in a bottle with a sports cap. Tough to mix though, because it's opaque.

Literally.

In centimeters or inches, not tagged size!

But no one's trying to blame anyone... To answer the baking question, THC and cannabinoids aren't water-soluble, but they are fat soluble, so you melt butter in boiling water, add your weed, let simmer for a while, and then you remove the bud with some kind of filter. You put the remaining liquid in the fridge, let it sit, and the THC infused butter will solidify at the top. This is the butter you use for your baking.

What's your neck/sleeve size, do you mind tailoring it? I know I fit just right into Gitman Vintage shirts, but they're expensive. Try Rugby. Or maybe, it might be worth waiting until I get the Cottonwork swatches.

If I'm not mistaken, it's hard to know your dosage, so it's easy to overdose, no?

Bongs waste less in my experience but I'm always high enough whichever I do. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5lbYdtspz4 Still waiting for someone to try this, then inhale the cold (and therefore less harsh?) smoke.

Eras have extra padding at the ankle but I'm not sure if they're that much more durable if you're not a skater.

Asking for durable CVOs is like asking for durable matches...

http://www.warbyparker.com/colonel-monocle-frame-tortoise :lol:

http://www.bobsdrunk.com/ Starting at 179$, which is pretty hefty, but hey, they're nice, and distinctive. American Optical make nice sunglasses too, they're very durable (military durable) and quite affordable.

He's not denying that, I think. The system is just being abused according to him.

Preach to the choir: check. @Venomai: Your study's results seem inconclusive to me, or rather, in need of contextualization. This study was conducted in 2004, so the numbers of heroin users are not those of 1972 (I can't find any, perhaps you'll do better). They are however probably comparable to those of the time, perhaps lower. Even if we make the overestimation that 20% of Americans had used heroin in their lifetime in 1972 (overestimation because the numbers for people 34+ years old are far lower), that's still a big contrast to the 79% of soldiers. There was likely a large correlation between the fact that they were at war, committing horrendous acts of violence, and their drug use. When the war ends, many of the problems which caused them to seek an "artificial paradise" end. This isn't the case in a city life setting however: while the war's continuation wasn't realistically influenced by the heroin addictions, a stable lifestyle can be. By exacerbating the problems which can cause a person to start using heroin (homelessness made worse by a lack of funds to pay for a house because of a need for drugs), the addiction can drag itself on.

Speaking of shoes, I bought off-white Authentics. They're going all blue because of my jeans.

You should completely overhaul your style, I think that would be pretty cool.

You should find a simple recipe for something delicious (lemon sherbet is good) and get the ingredients, on your own. Then make some [bleep]ing sherbet. Also on your own. I tried recently and it turned out terrible (it was a block of slightly creamy ice) but it still tasted pretty good.

I was about to say you're an ugly /mu/tated [bleep] that lurks in a sewer full of pretentious [cabbage]s, but then I read the small font. I don't know what to say now.

Yes, but it's just like the theory that people only give to charities because it feels good to pat yourself on the back. I believe it, but on the flip side, if it wasn't for that, no one would give to charities. So yeah, it's not all bad! [Edit] Except for local commercials, they're always terrible. But on the flip side, so much is spent on advertising nowadays I'm glad they cut back a little. I just don't watch TV at all.

I'm no lawyer or drug expert, but in a sense that does serve as a deterrent for companies not to pull out drugs that haven't been tested enough, as these compensations are likely due to the fact that the drug has some type of unexpected adverse effect. No?