Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Tip.It Forum

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

brunokiller

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brunokiller

  1. brunokiller replied to Leoo's topic in Off-Topic
    Today, some uni classmates complimented me on my ms paint skills.
  2. 'I want to make more elite diaries but I have no ideas so I'll post a diary and see what people come up with'. Tasks Make a glory amulet in Lumbridge(similar to rune cbow task) Rewards Access to new training area or something at piece of land east of magic training arena. (85+ agility) shortcut from catherbye to water obelisk island. Shortcut to and from Jatiszo to Neitiznot. Ability to set lyre teleport to Lunar Isle Fremennik boots act like a seal of passage (after completions of Lunar Diplomacy). Shortcut from air obelisk down to wildy (not back up) Cheaper planks from sawmill.
  3. How did this update make 26king easier? I was referring to making ep visible( the % thing).
  4. Please think through your updates. They've been going down since you released dragon claws and started the era of overpowered weapons so skillers could pk too and when they just realised they suck at it you made 26king easier. And what is the point of these spells? God spells hit harder and are cheaper(and are also 15 levels lower).
  5. So does the nature rune update pave the way for soul runecrafting?
  6. Just say that you don't have any articles and skip it for a week.
  7. This one isn't correct. You cannot obtain a crystal shield or bow at 50 agility. If you have 50 agility( minimum xp is 101333), then the agility xp from regicide will put you to 115083 xp, which is well over level 51(111945 xp)
  8. WellI'm not making up excuses. I amjust spewing out some theories of which some have been proven and some are not, but offer plausible explanations. If one is false then please do prove that it is. That's called falsifiability and what makes it a (potential) science. God does not allow falsifiability and is not a science. Therefore phenomena should only be explained by a theory that can be falsified.
  9. Human babies are unable to care for themselves for 10+ years. Love keeps the parents together, which means the child has a better chance to survive. Who is to say they don't? Some species have males and females that stay together for their whole life. Currents and reassigning nerve ends in our brain. That's what you think :wink: In concept you're just a machine. We still are driven by instinct. Ever been scared by something? Seen a beautiful woman and subconsciously staring at her before you realise what you are doing? We do. The chances of them following us is probably rather small as exactly the same mutations must occur, of which the chance is negigible. But they might get more intelligent. Doplhins, elephants, birds(singing) and many more creatures use sound to communicate. Never will. Still?
  10. Well since it does not support a tail anymore it is widely regarded as useless, but if it helps you to sit it found a new purpose (which is also evolution). Yes, but it cannot be observed, which is an important element amongst the scientific community. I used this argument because of the common usage of it against theism. "You cannot observe God, so why believe?" Saying that evolution takes a very long time is just as much of an "excuse" as saying god wants to be unseen. It left trails behind(otherwise known as fossiles and apparent useless remains of organs). I don't quite get where you're going with this. Can you please clarify? A two gender system is a system where animals have both male and female organs. It could be that some had a mutation that benefitted one of them, making them favour one gender. Two gender systems are much more efficient evolution wise because of the constant recombination of genes that does not occur with asexual reproduction. They're not useless. The tailbone is used to keep many muscles and ligaments in place, and the cecum stores liquid waste. And even if it seemed that there is a useless organ, it could just simply be that we have not discovered the use yet. That wasn't really what I was getting at though. I meant why is there such a great lack of mongrel-like species? Have you ever seen the anatonomy of a human? The cecum is miles away from the anus. And pretty much zero mucles are attacked to the tail bone because a. it's an unmovable piece of bone and b. humans dont have tails Evolution asserts abiogenesis - that we all came from one single cell that arose from inorganic material - that somewhere down the line there existed a cell without a parent. Evolution says nothing about how it started (no one knows how, but that's no excuse to pull a god-ism), but rather how it progresses and adapts. We're both living creatures. Of course you're going to see similarities. There is no doubt that monkeys and humans share some of the same genetic traits. The doubt comes into play when you conclude that they must be related. If you see two people walking next to each other, who only appear to have a 5% difference in their appearance, it's still completely possible that they're just friends instead of brothers. It's completely possible that humans looking like monkeys is a coincidence. How do you explain that fossiles with both human and monkey properties were found? The chance of us and monkeys not being relatives is zero. The evidence is overwhelming. With the following assumptions a. In the beginning there was nothing else than a singularity b. Life exists as of today. it becomes logically that life spawned from lifeless molecules(and how, well if you want to win a nobel prize...). I think you're overestimating the complexity of basic lifeforms that are not much more than methane reduction factories. I didn't mean to bring god into this point, so I'm sorry if it came out that way. My point here is that it's an argument from incredulity - evolution might be the only thing we can think of, but that doesn't mean someone with a greater imagination can't think of something more logically sound in the future. And it doesn't have to deal with god. It can be a whole new scientific theory. Evolution is the only plausible theory about the gradual changing and adapting of organisms. And it has been proven countless times. But isn't that microevolution? The lizards have never turned into a different creature, just lizards with random growths or body parts that have a chance of being beneficial for their survival. Following the above has proved that organisms change according to their environment in just 10 years. Scale this up to hundred thousand years and the differences must be even greater. Darwin saw this when he visited the Galápagos Islands. A long time ago, birds from the mainlands visited the islands. Some islands only had insects, other berries etc. They adapted to that, and now they cannot reproduce between; they have become different species. Micro evolution over long times-> new species.
  11. brunokiller replied to RpgGamer's topic in Off-Topic
    Its contents are fully the same compared to earlier flu vaccines, with the exception of some changed antigenes(Proteins on the outside of the virus, which change every year. With vaccination your body will quickly remember this because the vaccine simulated the virus and be able to rid the virus very quickly). So no they are (probably) not more dangerous than earlier vaccines. But I guess the virus probably won't kill a healthy adult so you shouldn't fear the virus too much.
  12. Macro evolution takes thousands of years. Ever heard of hermaphrodites? If half of the population slowly preferences the female and the other half male, I don't see how this can slowly turn into a two-gender system. Perhaps they were initially used to create more air resistance(i.e., longer fall and lower landing speed, and developed up from there. Just to name two useless organs in your body: Tail bone and cecum. How do biogenesis and evolution conflict? The equalities by humans and monkeys are overwhelming, with about every bone being in humans as well as monkeys. With the observation that our tail bone looks like a toned down version compared to that of a monkey with a tail we can easily conclude that humans and monkeys are related. Did you know about 95% of our genes are equal? They parted and both grew to the size of the original cell. Repeat this about 30 times and you have a human. The DNA also makes a copy of itself so both cells have the same DNA(with exception of reproduction cells where the DNA multiplication goes a bit different. With evolution every organism stays the same(i.e. we would still be bacteria eating methane), and if you imply that god dumped us on this planet as we are now, one ice age would kill nearly all the living things as they cannot adapt. Evolution has been proved countless times(and it allows falsifiability whereas god-ism does not(hence that you cannot prove that god does not exist). Scientists have released equal lizards on two different islands, and after a few dozen years both have independently changed to better suit their environment. You can show it with micro organism, to give an example consider the need for a new flu vaccine every year.
  13. To act big over the internet, of course.
  14. Let's say if god does exist, would he care about how much time you spent praying to him and reading his fiction? I'd be willing to bet he'd be more interested in how you treated everything and everyone around you. Not that I beleive in god :smile: (church is sooooo boring)
  15. The chance to win a lottery is essentially negigible. Does this mean no one ever wins a lottery?
  16. :thumbsup: Enough detail? :rolleyes: It's just that your screen doesnt have enough pixels lol
  17. But gorg i never said ags blitz wasnt overpowered.
  18. Geez you got owned :o. Like seriously i haven't seen a K0 that fast in ages. But did i miss something? I thought the Handcannon was slow? That looked pretty damn fast... And not to mention hitting a 54 through Prayer.... very odd. Pretty amazing. With the handcannon if you turn the spec on and set it to rapid the attack is the same as above. The killer there was the 0.6 second prayer delay. Was a good KO, but still bad luck on your part. You mentioned something about Jagex having to do something about the overpowered weapons? I assume you mean Godswords too then. Since the Handcannon really is only the GS for Rangers i don't think its unfair nor overpowered. Being able to kill someone from full hp in a single blow isn't overpowered?
  19. Gotta do something with the spec. And the shot was already fired so my pray didn't affect it.
  20. Gf jagex. But seriously, whats up with these overpowered weapons.
  21. And I was thinking they had given champion challenge a decent reward :wall:
  22. Spot the bug :wink: Also I just bought a range hat, only need the melee one now.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.