haggisoflife

As they've all but said MA is coming out next week I think he's playing with us, and with the fact that every other preview tweet has had an instant response of "ITS MA!!"

I dunno, if we ask real nice they might at least think about that last one

Depends how many of the players vote for them, and if people who don't play remember how much they've managed to squeeze out of Java I think your thinking of "The Movies". And if your not going to vote for Jagex then Lionhead (imo) is a damn fine choice as well :thumbup:

\ \

could also be agility

It was up on the runescape.com page, but it's now been taken down. It's still up on FunOrb.com though, so I wonder if they might have been asked to take it down from RS to stop the golden joystick site falling over :P

Can't say I was impressed with the questions that Andrew guy asked but the responses were kinda cute :) The last session they did (http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=95162977587) was more insightful, but that was due to the person not asking the same damn silly question 3 times. IMO they just had bad luck with who they picked, noones fault.

I thought it was more that a number of people decided, on very minimal "evidence", that it was Mobilising armies and then everyone decided to belivied them and got their hopes up cause the words "Still the new conveyances should help..." could, maybe, possibly, perhapse, if-you-squint-at-it have meant the content they were being hopeful about. seriously, given the wording of those previews I'm amased you can even work out they are about a content update half the time :lol:

So it would work like a thesaurs then, giving us different words with a similar meaning and a different turn of phrase. Considering that we are trying to solve a puzzle that sounds to me like multiple sets of clues, all the same clue but it's like being able to look at a jigsaw from different angles.

And greatly appreciated it is :thumbsup: :thumbup:

can;t we just get the RSS feed to post it up somewhere on the site?

My understanding of it, from all the Mod posts and talking to one in game a while back, was that they use the scanner to check for suspects and then a mod checks them out to see if they actually were doing anything wrong. So, to use your example, I belive it's a case of 'scan, investigate, evaluate, then jail if proof found' rather than 'scan & can if machine says 'yes''.

There is also no proof that it isn't, cause it's not like they can publish a list of all the accounts that they banned and then give full disclouse of the details for us to review etc imo they would only bother posting this if they want people to stop macroing as they are losing money from banning too many people. The post is aimed at discouraging players from cheating, rather than assuring people that cheaters will be banned like they did in the past. If they wanted to stop people quiting they would be all "oh we're keeping things safe for the honest player", so that people didn't walk with their memberships (which can come back to play). This is a lot more "We will find you so don't do it", cause they don't want to ban people for ever (who are much less likely to come back to play on a new account). either way - if it means less bots then I'm happy \

Flaming = Bad Heated & Passionate discussion = Good Telling the difference = nightmare Basically we need someone who won't pull the plug on a discussion just because two people are involved in a heavy debate over it. I think that Hall of Flame would be great, should show where the line is and set the rule by precident and example rather than wording =D>