Howlin0001

Hmm seems that you are actually right, I was looking up on google for any more sites to have something about this but seems like non do really. Also found http://jamesomalley.co.uk/blog/2009/01/ ... s-me-good/ Todays Daily Express front-page is screaming EU WILL GRAB BRITAINS GAS - and as you might expect, what with this being the Daily Express theyve got it wrong again. The story concerns an apparent clause in the Lisbon treaty that would apparently share Britains gas supplies with other EU states in times when supply is compromised, such as in the current situation of Russia turning off the taps to the Ukraine (and thus the rest of eastern Europe). Of course, The Express being The Express, are completely misrepresenting the issue at stake here: that of energy security. The report contains quotes from a Tory MEP and UKIPs crackpot leader Nigel Farage saying that Britain shouldnt share its supplies with the rest of Europe - apparently the Conservative party will resist any moves towards EU common energy resources. This is unbelievably short-sighted. Its all well and good wanting to hang on to the gas youve got - but thats no good if youve got none in the first place. So sorry for this then it can be locked if needed or just left here.

Not the one I saw but I only saw that heading and read it.

Do you think the E.U is getting a bit too much power? I ask this because of the article I saw in the paper today [hide=EU WILL GRAB BRITAIN'S GAS]BRITAINS vital North Sea oil and gas supplies are to be taken over by Europe under emergency plans revealed for the first time in Brussels yesterday. EU leaders are demanding control of British energy reserves to prevent power blackouts that have left millions of eastern Europeans without heat in Arctic weather due to the Russian gas blockade. Euro-MPs are calling for the creation of a European gas reserve, made up of British and Dutch supplies, which member states can tap into in the event of any future shortage. The transfer of ownership would be enacted under secret powers written into the controversial Lisbon Treaty. It gives Europe the legal power to take over individual states supplies to ensure security of energy supply in the Union. Ultimate control over Britains vast natural gas and oil fields by far the biggest resource within the EU will fall to Brussels if the new treaty, which has already been ratified by Britain, is adopted throughout Europe. Last night, however, there were calls for Britain to stand firm against the seizure of our oil and gas. UKIP leader Nigel Farage said: Brussels has already stolen our fish. Now they want our oil and gas. These are vital resources to Britain and we demand that the British Government vetoes these proposals. This shows how vital it is that the UK holds a referendum on our future in the European Union. Shadow Foreign Secretary William Hague said: EU Commission president Jose Manuel Barroso is right to say that the EU needs to help eastern Europe with its energy security. But giving the EU control over our national energy reserves is totally the wrong way to go about it. This is a regretful example of how the renamed EU constitution would give the EU too much power over our national affairs and why so important a treaty should be put to the British people to decide in a referendum. What we really need is a proper free market in energy in the EU. The EU already has the power it needs to achieve that. Syed Kamall, Conservative MEP for London, said: Conservatives will continue to resist any moves towards EU common energy resources. The Common Fisheries Policy has already decimated our fishing industry. An EU common energy resource policy would do the same to what little is left of our oil reserves. Russian and Ukrainian officials and energy firm executives were yesterday locked in crisis talks in Brussels in a bid to break the deadlock over blocked supplies that has hit power deliveries to 10 EU countries. Meanwhile, in a closed-door meeting with high-ranking European politicians, Mr Barroso said the current crisis showed the need for urgency in adopting a common EU energy policy. He called for a mutualisation of energy stocks, the better use of EU indigenous energy resources and said it was vital that member states show solidarity with their struggling partners in eastern Europe. Mr Barroso added that he would soon have the legal authority to take over control of energy reserves under the Lisbon Treaty. He said the new powers were necessary because requests to national governments to detail what gas reserves they had available had produced no response. MEPs also called yesterday for control over Britains dwindling natural resources. Austrian Hannes Swoboda and Dutchman Jan Marinus Wiersma said there was an urgent need for a European gas stockpile. Mr Swoboda said: Some countries are not happy with the idea but it is absolutely necessary. Mr Wiersma told the Daily Express the idea would involve stockpiling gas from producer countries such as the UK and the Netherlands to tide over vulnerable member states in the face of future crises.[/hide] Taken from http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/790 ... tain-s-gas So if Ireland had of said yes to the Lisbon treaty (will we probably will be forced to do anyway) and the others countries said yes(I think they may have) then the E.U would be kind of communist then wouldn't it? (Hmm I wonder what other secret stuff is in the E.U that we don't know about? :-k ) What do you think?

The reason why that is, is because the stat sig gets your stats from the RuneScape hiscores while the one where you mentioned in the special calc's you can input your own levels and you can't in the stat sig. At least thats the way I think your stats are collected on any stat sig(other then your quest points but that's different).

I think it's the fact there seeing a boob while they/there family/friends are trying to eat.

Wait you mean most monsters on that list has pictures in there respected bestiary entry?

So go feed the child in the bathroom and the dinner table is where your meant to get your food?

Just got it from a level two clue 5.5mill at mid nice.

Thanks it was the coding but fixed and credited now. :thumbsup:

I don't get it.

Was it just me or did any of you except it to go bestiality style? (I did mainly because the track record of the forum wouldn't be the best and some people I wouldn't put it past to post something like that.)

What about straight people are they meant to keep it in the proverbial closet where your chosen method of orgasm belongs as well or are they let to have it 24/7 on television, in print, movies, etc?

In the context of murder, that's understandable. Animals kill each other all the time but they do so because they have no understanding of morality. I though animals killed each other for food and women and invasion of land?

It's in between every 10 kills, howlin.. that's why you don't see a thing. Sorry my fault I didn't see the last three words, I though you meant see you got a 130 dark beast task and that was very rare. My fault sorry.

I don't see where it says anything about your task. :wall: :wall:

Did you happen to kill his little helpers to get that because I though if it was him who dropped it, it would be on the bones and ruby etc, but by the position I'm kinda more looking at his helpers who dropped it. (But I maybe wrong either way nice :thumbsup: ) What you get from the clue?

*This wasn't me but did happen in our school* A first year drank pee =D> =D> What happened was his firend asked could he have a drink of his coke and he said yes, so the friend went to the bathroom and put in a little present into the coke bottle but the owner of the coke didn't know about this. So the friend we ut and gave the bottle to the owner and the owner drank some of it and then his firned told him he too a pee in it so he basically drank pee. I'm not sure what happened then but teachers found out and talked to the two parties involved. But in the end we heard that the friend didn't actually piss in the bottle he was messing so the owner didn't in fact drink pee :cry: (But he might of been lieing to get out of trouble, so he might of really peed in the bottle we'll never know for sure.)

Thanks done and released.

Lol no :-X No (again hint look at the chatbox)

[hide=][/hide] Who notices something wrong there? (hint look at chat box)

The player mod didn't mute you for 24 hours. They only muted you until the J-mod saw the report and took action. So it was the J-mod who muted you not the p-mod. You said unrealistic, not it's against the rules. It can be seen as encouraging people. *It's hard to talk to a person who hates p-mods for the actions of the j-mods but takes it out on the p-mods.*

Lol I am a mod but I'm only saying it the way they see it and do agree.

Yea sorry I picked it up wrong thanks though

You did say; you could rtw xp That's all that's needed, messing or not it's breaking the rules.

How can I do it with only one person? I have heard of a way with rune thrown axes but I@m not sure how.