Licky Kat

http://forum.tip.it/viewtopic.php?t=431754 there are good pixel tutorials in that post.

I added another room and some grass outside hope I did alright.

Bwareofmef is still a forum mod just not a player mod.

stanford Quote: You people don't understand this at all. You are either the strong, or the weak. The weak can either die or get the hell out of the wild. The strong however, can do ANYTHING they want within Jagex rules. I personally don't pk Runecrafters but I think they DESERVE to be pk'ed. --------- As I said and you obviously didn't read, this is supposed to be a debate, I was not ranting, I never said I don't think people should be pk'd while doing those two skills I said I don't particularly like it, but I will not rant because of the fact that it IS the wild and that IS a part of the game. Although as I said I DO see a reason for killing abyss Rcr's but I do not really see a point in killing those training agility, other than to annoy them. And even if it isn't against the rules, there is such thing as common courtesy ie: Polite behavior. A polite gesture or remark. If one sees someone in the wild that is training agility with no weapons and sees someone else not too far away that is actually in the wild TO PK then which would be the better one to kill? The one minding their own business that will give you no reward when they die or the one that is there to fight others that WILL give a reward when they die? Please do not group me with "you people". I am an individual with my own thoughts and feelings. --------- 0ne_time Quote: Who said you had to finish that subquest to gain acces to the arena? You get acces to the arena in the middle of the subquest, which is before the time when you have to use your cooking. ------------ I did not know that, my friend that has finished it neglected to inform me of that. Thank you for the information, I wasn't even going to attempt that subquest without the cooking level. Although someone else said I can't start it without the cooking level hmmm... Guess I will just have to go find out.

Oh yes I am fully aware of that :-) like I said its annoying but I won't go on whining about it due to the fact that its a risk I take. I WOULD use the monkey agility course, but even though I have 88 agility I can not get to it because I do not have the cooking level needed to finish that part of the 100th quest :(

I met my husband online. Mind you not in a game, or a dating service, but we did meet online. I don't think runescape is the best place to "find" a "bf or gf" though. Although not everyone who has a "bf or gf" in runescape only has them online, some know eachother in person too. edit: and some do it just for the fun of adding to the role playing part of the game edit 2: I also know a couple of adults who have met IN runescape and now live together in real life and plan on getting married.

okies just right click it and go to properties to get the url to use, although I am sure you already know that :-P

too slow?

Actually it is 1,2,3 but because it is a continuous frame it can appear to be backwords lemme slow it down more for you.

too fast? too slow?

not sure how fast or slow you want it though

Since this is meant to be a debate.... I personally do not pk unless I am in a clan war or something of the sort. Although, I do not think pking is completely wrong. I say if you are out there to pk, go pk someone else who is out there to pk. I do not really "like" seeing or hearing about the rc's that are pked but I can see a point to people doing it, as some have runes on them and others have glories and some even have armour. What I really dislike is seeing Agility trainers being killed. Obviously I love agility, its my highest stat, and for the most part the agility arena is pretty empty out there in the wild. But it just gets to me when I have been there for a couple hours, am about to finally get another level and someome comes and pks me. Mind you what's even worse is when I go there and get pk'd by OTHER trainers! they won't get food from me, or weapons (I take no weapons only a knife to cut the webs) and I take about 10 lobs AT MOST!! I have plenty of time to eat them while being killed just so the pker doesn't get the satisfaction of getting food from me. But I am not going to actually "whine" or complain and say it is unfair, its fair alright, very fair. If I didn't want to risk being pk'd at all I could easily go to one of the other agility places to train. While it is fair, it is not very nice, mind you I like to practice comon courtesy, which many people on this game seem to lack. Just my two cents... Kat

Only once? :? they didn't say ONLY once, they said At LEAST once a week... some people never exercise when they should. And Once a week is better than not at all, so exercise at least once a week!

Because you can not sell them in notes, and you have to take a diamond every time to get in...

Y does it matter? :? Because if you wear the ammulet you can see what the monkey really says and its quite funny in my opinion, I just don't have a saved copy of it, didn't think to get one at the time.

If you can, show one while wearing the ammulet of monkey speak and one without it please.

No mods cannot remove their crowns. Edit: Anytime this happens you should report them for staff impersonation.

I am only 20, Turn 21 July 3rd *can't wait* I am a married housewife with no kids, I have been playing for a year and a half now. I was introduced to the game by two really good friends ages 33 and 28. Many adults play RS. Keep in mind it is the adults (mid-late 20s and early 30s) that DESIGNED Runescape. And it is those that are even a few years older than that, that started computer games! Does anyone honestly believe that when you get older you all of the sudden lose interest in ALL games? mind you there are many types of games, computer, card, board, console, sports, and more. Adults and older players have free time, and "down time" where they get off work, kids are asleep, days off, etc. just like "kids" do. Some adults spend that time reading, some watching tv, some shopping, some going out to clubs, malls, etc, and others choose to spend that time playing games, online or on a console. Many adults also play with their children. I know most people can say they have played board games and card games with their entire family, well, in that respect, some families have decided instead of playing those types of games together they would rather play an online role playing game. Runescape is the perfect online game for a family due to the fact that its free, and if you want to play members, the entire family can pay to play for the same ammount it would cost for only ONE family member to play one of the other mmorpgs out there. Just my thoughts and opinions... Mrs C

http://www.dafont.com/

I know a 24 year old that collects my little ponies *Rock on old school*!

now you make the frames... and how long you want the delay to be and hide any levels you don't want showing in each frame...

make different layers with what you want each layer to look like (text wise) and jump to imageready

http://forum.tip.it/viewtopic.php?t=224005&highlight= http://forum.tip.it/viewtopic.php?t=225754&highlight= look at the dates on those, I THINK the regulars here know what they are talking about

I'd love the instructions on how to make one!

Characteristics of art: Requires creative perception both by the artist and by the audience Elusive (as in "tending to evade cut-and-dried definitions or being fixedly grasped") Communicates on many levels and is open to many interpretations Connotes a sense of ability Interplay between the conscious and unconscious part of our being, between what is real and what is an illusion Any human creation which contains an idea other than its utilitarian purpose. That which is created with intention to be experienced as art Search of different forms of beauty The word art is also used to apply judgments of value, as in such expressions as "that meal was a work of art" (the cook is an artist), or "the art of deception," (the highly attained level of skill of the deceiver is praised). It is this use of the word as a measure of high quality and high value that gives the term its flavor of subjectivity. Making judgments of value requires a basis for criticism: a way to determine whether the impact of the object on the senses meets the criteria to be considered art, whether it is perceived to be ugly or beautiful. Perception is always colored by experience, so a reaction to art as 'ugly' or 'beautiful' is necessarily subjective. Because of its elusive nature, "good" art is not always, or even regularly, appealing. In other words, it does not have to be "nice-looking", and often depicts terrible images made for social, moral, or thought-provoking reasons. Countless schools have proposed their own ways to define quality, yet they all seem to agree in at least one point: once their aesthetic choices are accepted, the value of the work of art is determined by its capacity to transcend the limits of its chosen medium in order to strike some universal chord (which, oddly enough, tends to be the most personal one). Many people's opinions of what art is would fall inside a relatively small range of accepted standards, or "institutional definition of art" (George [bleep]ie 1974). This derives from education and other social factors. Most people did not consider the depiction of a Brillo Box or a store-bought urinal to be art until Andy Warhol and Marcel Duchamp (respectively) placed them in the context of art (i.e., the art gallery), which then provided the association of these objects with the values that define art. Most viewers of these objects initially rejected such associations, because the objects did not, themselves, meet the accepted criteria. The objects needed to be absorbed into the general consensus of what art is before they achieved the near-universal acceptance as art in the contemporary era. Once accepted and viewed with a fresh eye, the smooth, white surfaces of Duchamp's urinal are strikingly similar to classical marble sculptural forms, whether the artist intended it or not. This type of recontextualizing provides the same spark of connection expected from any "good" art.... see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art for the full "ARTicle"