l0l0lpur34

Why not? Pakistan is far more of a nuclear threat than Iran, and they already have nuclear weapons. I don't support a nuclear Iran, but I don't support a nuclear United States, either. Second, there's no evidence that they're enriching uranium for weapons. Israel has nuclear weapons and won't even admit to it. Talk about hypocrisy. And last: What if Iran Acted like the United States Government Please tell me you're not really THAT naive. Honestly, that's a situation where you say "No [cabbage], Sherlock." Just like this one. I support nuclear countries. All except Iran and Pakistan. Pakistan's a whole other matter though, and in all honesty I know very little about it. who is the USA to dictate who is "allowed" nuclear power and who isn't?

all the people saying to use violence - grow up. also it's very rare that anyone can "beat anyone to a pulp" without any sort of injuries themself. violence would solve absolutely nothing ignore all the childish people's advice (which they probably wouldn't follow themself in the same situation) and just ignore them.

this thread helps remind me why I HATED school and what is so much better about college ignore them, they are just an immature attention seeker

Yes, I am Canadian. I'm not a child, though. Swing and a miss. And no, I don't understand the United States constitution very well. I believe I even said so in the "4th Amendment" thread. you sure act like one

that was a called for and inventive way to attack the US for no reason. Lol, i don't mean to side track the topic by bringing this up, but dude I wasn't attacking the US, I live in Wisconsin. I was just referring to the point that no democracy has every declared war on another democracy, ever. This international rule of thumb line kinda got blurred when the US attacked Iraq while Iraq claimed to be a democracy. Hence, to sidestep getting in this very argument #-o I put a "lets ignore the US for sake of argument" into my post since I was trying to stay focused on India. It wasn't a slight to the US. Anyway... Lol wut The US isn't a democracy anyway; it's a constitutional republic. I bet you don't even know what a "constititional republic" means

Bolded the statement that is obviously correct. Why do you care if the government is watching you? As long as you've done nothing wrong, what on earth could they do with that information? why does the government need to watch me if I'm doing nothing wrong? sounds like you want a police state where everyone is guilty until proven innocent

Poor go [bleep] yourself Its called a capitalist society for a reason. People who are poor generals screwed up somewhere and they have to live with that. Why should I have to work for someone else to have health care. They want good health care? They can work. If they don't want to be "poor" enroll in the Armed Forces, they will take care of you. And for those of you who are undoubtedly going to say, "You need money to go to college and to make lots of money you need a good education." My step dad has never spent a single day in college, and makes more than $200,000 a year. He has had no further education that high school. have you ever worked a day in your life? or is everything you own given to you by your parents?

As much as a lot of people seem to believe, the government doesn't just pick people up off the street and say "I think you-- and you-- and you are terrorists. Come with us." When someone is suspected of terrorism, it's for a good reason. Yes. Oops. "oops"? thankyou for confirming you are an immature prepubescent kid who thinks it's a funny to torture people based on that they might be a "terrorist".

I suffered from depression for basically around 6 years (extremely severe for the last 2 years of it) and I can tell you there is light at the end of the tunnel, however pointless things may feel.

The last time the monarch refused to grant royal assent to a new law was 300 years ago - if she tried to do it today then there would be a revolution

You "Mossiah" is already doing that. Now anyone under the age of 13 can't buy a dirt bike because they are afraid they might lick the gear box. That is defiantly not controlling my life! When they became a terrorist they gave up their human rights. They can step all over every other persons but when they get caught they go and hide behind the rights they just so blatantly blew up. You say that the torture encourages terrorism... Who did what first? They attacked us, we retaliated. Point Blank. Robert keep on fighting. Who do you mean by "they"? muslims? and lol @ the statement I highlighted.

You don't care about anyone but yourself, and you openly support "authoritiarianism". e.g: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=789797

By the look at some of your other posts on here you spit at all forms of human rights, freedom and democracy

Less than 60p - a tiny amount.

Suicide is a permanent solution to a (most of the time) temporary problem.

I'm not convinced on the money argument after seeing some of the recent scandals with MP expenses!

I bet you can't even find Israel on a map My point was that this whole "every country in the world except america are all subhuman terrorists" attitude is disgusting to say the least.

Imagine another country sent in thousands of it's soldiers with guns and tanks and bombs and blew up your city... then tell me you wouldn't be annoyed at that country.

So your saying that 20 American soldiers lives are not worth some pin [puncture]'s emotions who would most likely run into the group of the marines with a bomb strapped to him, given the opportunity? If so then you are one screwed up person.. What happened to support the troops? If the US had to kill 20 terrorists to save 15 American lives, they got my 110% support. The terrorists belong in hell, were just giving them a one way ticket. Gitmo is not as bad as they put it, the guard there watching the damn hodgies got worse treatment then them. They got 3 square meals a day, prayer time, and what do the guards get? Crap thrown at them, they sometimes go without food for a day or 2, they have to put up with the losers. In retrospect, they are barely hurt. You may not know this but torture is a reliable way, they squeal, they get sent back to their cell, the info is confirmed or denied, if it is denied the hodgie gets another visit from the conductor. This happens until the info is received. If you think peace with someone will solve the problems, tell me, I will buy you a ticket there and you can talk it out. Tell me how it goes. How do you know they are "terrorists" who will "run into the group of the marines with a bomb strapped to him, given the opportunity?" if they are being locked up without charge and waterboarded?

All I can say is wow, I can't take any of your posts seriously anymore.

If a civillian showed up while your house was burning and saved you, would you ask them "Who made you fireman?" Read that post again... then edit it so it isn't as ridiculous. Oh, really? Without the United States, a man named Sadaam Hussein (sp?) would be gallivanting about the Middle East, creating unrest wherever possible. Without the United States, a little country called North Korea would run rampant over the world with its new nuclear weapons. A world without the USA is a world with terror. LMFAO, how old are you? 14? Typical wannabe tinpot dictator

If a civillian showed up while your house was burning and saved you, would you ask them "Who made you fireman?" Read that post again... then edit it so it isn't as ridiculous.

The only comment I'll make on this thread is that the "nothing to hide, so don't care if privacy is invaded" attitude a lot of people have is a slippery slope.

I feel physically sick reading some of the warmongering posts on this topic - who made the USA the world's policeman?

I tried to write a proper response to this but instead I'll just reply with: ignorant [bleep]. also what evidence do you have for the ridiculous statement I have highlighted?