l0l0lpur34

The BNP is a racist, nazi party who wants to deport anyone who isn't white, ban homosexuality, and isolate us from the rest of the world. Their apologists will claim "the BNP has changed now" but they really haven't.

the conservatives basically want to slash spending on public services to be able to make tax cuts for the rich to help "Dave's" mates, and at the same time send us back into recession and ruin the lives of people who weren't born with a silver spoon in their mouth by making them lose their jobs. I'm not sure who I'll vote for, I live in a very safe labour seat so it probably won't make a difference anyway due to our anti-democratic electoral system.

From what I've read, the population is actually declining in some European countries. Yep, and without immigration to increase the size of the working population you're looking at massive tax rises to make up for the massive increase in spending on pensions and healthcare which will be neccasary due to the baby boomers retiring.

KFC is an American company, yes. Now that I think about it, they're also struggling to survive in the United States; many branches have closed down. I have only seen a KFC franchise operating inside another franchise such as Taco Bell in the past few years, although there are some independent branches still operating. They probably just assume that if they cater to Muslims in pockets around England, they can get more customers. It's still ridiculous, though. As for the BNP comment, I do not support them nor do I believe that they should be voted for due to their shady past. Although I do think that English Nationalism is the only thing that will save England at this point in time. The UK needs to immediately withdraw from the EUSSR (as it is jokingly called) and focus on taking care of its problems. Otherwise, England is doomed (which would make the entire UK doomed since England is the most influential nation). I was trying to grasp just how crowded England is, so I compared it to the size of my home state and got a pretty close match. England has about 40-50 million people, and my home state (Arkansas) only has about 3 million people. It's hard for me to imagine 50 million people living here! "EUSSR"? Lmfao how is the EU communist at all. Leaving the EU would be disastrous for the UK. I'm assuming Arkansas has vast areas of unpopulated land? The UK is really not as "overcrowded" as "nationalists" (i.e. racist scaremongerers) would like to have you believe.

Dude, I've been down a very simiar road. I think all of the "gurus" of this thread have. But I still have faith in the unconditional love, friend -> boyf4riend transition. I still believe its possible. It worked out for me (atleast for a while) and I see that you and l0l0l have both been through similiar. Oneitis sucks. But only when it doesn't work out. If it works, it's the most blissful experience tin the world. All you need is faith and the confinedsne that it won't be the end of the world if things don't go your way. How can you expect to have a romantic relationship without hope? You even admit to being emotionally numb. Some girl screwed you up. Bad. We all (or will) have a girl like that. Its who we come out as at the end of the road that matters. Don't spread the cynaicism - Inspire Hope! How many times does oneitus "work" ? Women don't have sex with people they see as friends, simple as that. You watch too many films

I've suffered from oneitus twice, once when I was like 9 and once about a year ago (both ended up hating me - and the repurcussions (her being fairly popular means she can turn people against me fairly easily...) from the one about a year ago will probably keep affecting me until I move away from my hometown and go to university) and I now often get paranoid that I'm becoming too close to people even as friends, causing me to end up acting cold with people for no rational reason (the people I'm close friends understand though thankfully). Just really really glad I discovered certain things I did a few months ago or I'd probably still be obsessing over the girl/ would probably end up making the same mistakes again and again.

It doesn't sound like you've really changed. You lost some weight and have some girls after you. She knew you before you were depressed and she passed you up for this guy who's known as a jerk. It doesn't sound like you've had some metamorphosis. She decided to date the jerk over the pudgier, less popular you. She wants a relationship now. Ask yourself what's really changed? If she wants a relationship she passed up on a year ago with you now because you lost weight and got popular, that's no basis for a healthy relationship. Ask yourself why all your friends think she's a flirt? If you think about it objectively for a moment, you might realize she's just the flirt who chose the jerk over you when she had the chance. The mix of advice you are getting is rather comical. While she may be this terrible person that the last two posts have illustrated, it is possible she made a mistake. You probably shouldn't take advice from me, but what I would do, is take a step back and look at it. Make sure you notice all of your other options, and don't act fall into this "oneitis" thing. If you can date her without being obsessed, it could be fun. Just be wary - they aren't wrong when they say she could mold you like silly putty then discard you like store-brand playdough. He ALREADY HAS oneitis and the girl knows it. She will cause drama/ withhold sex from him/use him as an emotional tampon while shagging "jerk guys" behind his back. I'm sorry l0l0l, but I had to facepalm after reading your post. Do you really have no faith in humanity or human relationships? I understand the whole teenage mentality thing (actually I don't, no one does, not even the girl if we're really going to get into it) but don't you think you're over reacting with the "Cut off all contact with her" bit? You know what that will do? Drive her away from him. She's a flirt. It's not like there aren't 1000 other guys she can use to fill the void with. Strike now or forever hold your peace, fruitdisc. Yes, she does have other guys to "fill the void" - just like if he snapped out of his obsession, he would have other girls to "fill the void" with. The sooner contact is cut, the sooner the obsession will be cured and the sooner he will be able to find a girl who doesn't see him as just one of their girlfriends. It's suprisingly common how often people get obsessed with one person they have no chance with, and are willing to ignore everything to try and get them, and also scary the way it sometimes ends up.

It's not about "wanting nothing more than sex from guys", it's about that she sees you as one of her girlfriends and nothing more, and never will. I got the idea that you are obsessed from that you "unconditionally love" someone you aren't even with, and that you seem to be ignoring your friends/all other females in order to chase after one girl.

Are you asexual or just a very young child? I'm not sure how to put it, but the 2 bits of your posts I highlighted sound, umm childish to put it simply 1) Grave-Digger 2) according to his profile, he's 16 not a child. 3) although I personally disagree with "no sex outside marriage part", a marriage based on sex isn't a marriage at all like he said. 4) I had similar beliefs before a few one-nighters changed my opinion and for me to stop being so uptight over things. 5) ....5 is a number. He sounds like a child, perhaps he's just very sheltered? The whole "no sex outside marriage" thing is something a few people have being indoctrinated into by religion. You do know the reason marriage was invented was so women could be treated as property? It's only in the past couple of hundred years (if even that) marriage has being linked to "being in love". The difference between a relationship and a friendship is pretty much, sex. Are you asexual or just a very young child? I'm not sure how to put it, but the 2 bits of your posts I highlighted sound, umm childish to put it simply Well he's got a point. A relationship purely off sex isn't marriage. It's a one-night stand. OK, they key "word" in the phrase one-night stand is one-night - so by definition, a marriage cannot be a one-night stand.

really close FRIENDS That's because to you, she is another friend she has no sexual interest in - whereas "jerkguy" didn't cover up his true intentions with a "nice guy" act. Were you ever diagonosed with anything? Attempting to replace being obsessed with one girl with being obsessed with another helps nothing. There's probably something really wrong with the way you treat women if you are having this "instant friendzone" problem. Why not go after some of them rather than continuing your obsession with this one girl? Really? She tried to control him by causing drama but he was having none of it. Stop it with this "love" stuff, you are OBSESSED. She hasn't "fallen for you", your oneitus is reframing the reality (that she wants to use you as an emotional tampon for a bit) as "falling for you". She just wants to take advantage of your oneitus for a bit then leave you. You need to overcome this They recognise your oneitus (obsession) and realise how dangerous it is. Also, never pick girls over your mates. You don't "love" her, you're OBSESSED with her, and she knows you are! WHAT is so special about this girl apart from that you've projected the image of this perfect woman onto her, when she clearly thinks of you as one of her girl mates? Start talking to other girls, and try to get over this obsession ASAP rather than wasting your time on this one person, you're better than that - really what is special about this girl to that you're willing to let her disrespect you so much yet still go crawling back to her? Do you really think she finds you being obsessed with her to the point you're willing to ignore your mates, and ignore the existance of other girls attractive?

It doesn't sound like you've really changed. You lost some weight and have some girls after you. She knew you before you were depressed and she passed you up for this guy who's known as a jerk. It doesn't sound like you've had some metamorphosis. She decided to date the jerk over the pudgier, less popular you. She wants a relationship now. Ask yourself what's really changed? If she wants a relationship she passed up on a year ago with you now because you lost weight and got popular, that's no basis for a healthy relationship. Ask yourself why all your friends think she's a flirt? If you think about it objectively for a moment, you might realize she's just the flirt who chose the jerk over you when she had the chance. The mix of advice you are getting is rather comical. While she may be this terrible person that the last two posts have illustrated, it is possible she made a mistake. You probably shouldn't take advice from me, but what I would do, is take a step back and look at it. Make sure you notice all of your other options, and don't act fall into this "oneitis" thing. If you can date her without being obsessed, it could be fun. Just be wary - they aren't wrong when they say she could mold you like silly putty then discard you like store-brand playdough. He ALREADY HAS oneitis and the girl knows it. She will cause drama/ withhold sex from him/use him as an emotional tampon while shagging "jerk guys" behind his back.

Cut ALL contact with the girl NOW, she knows you're obsessed with her so you'll be like putty in her hands so she can mess you around for a bit then leave you for another "jerk". Oneitis is a difficult disease to recover from but if you recongise it you can overcome it. (It's an extremely dangerous one too). The second you became "best friends" with her, your chance of having a proper relationship with her evaporated. Don't listen to these people saying you'll have a great happy relationship with her and should go for it - women can detect oneitis, and they both 1) find it very unattractive, 2) find it funny to take advantage of it when possible.

Are you asexual or just a very young child? I'm not sure how to put it, but the 2 bits of your posts I highlighted sound, umm childish to put it simply

Good, the ban was brought in through a combination of scaremongering and homophobia - glad it's now being overturned.

This whole "you'll never need to do x in a job, so it's pointless to learn it" arguments are stupid, sure you might not need to do the stuff again but it's transferable skills - e.g. say you study History. It's unlikely you'll ever use any of the knowledge from it ever again, but it teaches you how to write an essay, analyse sources etc.

I'm not familiar with what an "open liquor ticket" is - is it basically a ticket for drinking on the streets? It's probably not worth the time and effort of fighting it, probably best to just take it on the chin :\ Why, exactly? Because Hex is 8 years old and thinks its offensive that people drink alchohol. Yeh, Because mummy says alchohol is naughty (No, Basically whats the hype over alcohol, why drink it if you get into trouble: i know it may give off some good effects but seriously... How does it help you in the long run?) It's fun.

You're obviously missing some pretty vital points then. The government has business in some aspects of society, but personal safety - which is their intentions for making seat belts and helmets mandatory - is the business of the individual. That's like making it illegal to eat to many hamburgers. I pity a person who cannot see the beauty of exercising their own rights and freedoms. I'm not saying that people shouldn't wear seat belts. Hell, I even wear mine. I just think it's ridiculous to force it upon someone. It's your body and your property. And in the case of human projectiles, that is a rare exception, much like what you made of my arguments about being trapped in a car. Personally I've never seen or heard about someone killing another person because they didn't wear a seat belt, so I highly doubt it's a common occurrence. It's not just "personal safety"!! Other people use the road! Other people have to clean up the dead bodies! Also "human projectiles" isn't "rare" at all, if someone hits the side or back of your car when you have a belt on, the belt will stop you from moving very far - if you are just sitting there there's NOTHING to stop you being flung in the other direction either through the windscreen, into the other passengers or even being crushed into the little space beneath the seats.

What good link? :huh: The one Zierro posted in the OP.

Btw, that "good link" looks like a pathetic conspiracy theory/libertarian nutcase website, I can't believe anyone takes it seriously.

Even in countries without universal healthcare like the US, doesn't the state usually answer emergency calls like car accidents and the like? Yep, and it's their emergency services who have to indentify the dead bodies of ignorant [bleep]s who end up going through their windscreen when they could've spent a couple of seconds putting a belt on and ended up escaping with minor injuries.

Ofcourse seatbelts should be compulsory, the whole "need to escape if you are in water" argument is completely stupid, it takes what 5 seconds to press the button to undo it? and situations like that are very rare. Whereas rear ended shunts, side collisions and head on collisions are much much more common, i.e. situations where with no seatbelt there is NOTHING to stop you being flung around the car into other passengers/ through the window if you have no belt on. I remember seeing something about how in a crash the people in the back had no belts on and their bodies ended up being sucked under the front seats, absolutely horrific. dont even bring in the whole "freedom" argument - what about other passengers, other road users, your family and the poor person who has to scrape your body from the inside of the windscreen because you were too [bleep]ing lazy to put a belt on?

To cure other diseases? Ridiculous conspiracy theory

I'm sure scientists with PhDs know much much more than some kid on a runescape forum. Don't flame down his argument when you can't prove anything yourself kiddo. He knows more than you do. My point is the scientists working on combating HIV know 1000x more than anyone here so that massive essay about how he figured out how to cure HIV was pointless.

I'm sure scientists with PhDs know much much more than some kid on a runescape forum.

You can put on/ lose weight eating either healthy food or junk food you know... its the quantity, if calories in > calories out then you gain weight, if calories out > calories in you lose weight. It's not the weight which is the reason they took a lot of the crap out, it's how unhealthy it is for you.