rudes7

Bottom line is woox16 is good at what he does, getting recognition for that isnt a bad thing.

Wonder if water Sold his phat to afford prayer, kinda hefty price tag for f2p standards

What Would Suomi's Rc gains at crawlers be like roughly??

The Value of 91+ RC has reduced as a result, was wondering why i didn't see any graahk runecrafters at castle wars. *facepalm*

Can someone tell me the new tradeable items released with this quest

I've Told you already but Gratz again on rank 1 mr suomi, gonna be on top a long time >.<

How can you compare maging in bandos to playing basketball in soccer shoes? You seem to forget that Rs is a game, NOT to be compared with real life...

Our database hasn't been leaked Some hackers may have admin access on tip.it, believe it or not idc.

You sir have pretty much summed it all up, 3hitu if you have been registered on other runescape forums (even tip.it in some cases) hackers could have access to private info like email, isp, previous passwords...e.t.c Also the fact that you are a fairly FAMOUS player and also INACTIVE and also! Wealthy makes you and obvious target. Quite unfortunate tbh :/

Lol'd :P Jagex's focus this year seemed to be about money tbh. Free trade/wildy returning, refer a friend, 15% cheaper mems,loyalty programme... Well could be fair to say, they are a company and a company needs to make money :/

Lol'd :D

@isthatok Where would be a better place to find out about botting than from the makers themselves? >.>

For those who are interested in jagex's bot detection techniques: Our actual detection system monitors player behavior autonomously. As most bot programmers have unfortunately and conveniently guessed, it works on a comparison of expected human behavior to the observed behavior. Thus, macros that follow a set series of commands would be incredibly easy to catch, if they would even be operational. Random camera shifts usually thwart these, and finding them is a very rare occurrence. We regularly dismantle macros, and the most common approach taken is object recognition with a series of programmed responses. One of our very first attempts to counter this was random color changes, usually not very noticeable. This turned out to be a failure as object recognition technology proved to be far ahead of this eventuality." "Unless the appearance of the interface was changed sufficiently enough to make it unusable to even a regular player, it was not practical to make the game not recognizable to a macro program. All that we could do was analyze rather than inhibit, so to speak. By determining sets of behaviors that are not characteristically human, in "criteria", we would get the alarm from the system if all were met. The first criteria is quite a bit similar to that of most first person shooter (FPS) games who take steps to detect "aimbots." This would be simple movement. Inhumanly fast cursor movements are highly suspicious, and consistent patterns of such movements (to discern from some player who gets bored and plays with the mouse .) I don't know the actual numbers involved, sorry. Some exceptionally skilled players frequently do trigger this, which is why multiple criteria exist. The second criteria is the "accuracy" of the clicks. The interface determines exactly here any specific click was made, and is further divided into the actual buttons such as the inventory, worn equipment, etc... Primitive programs typically recognize the object, but click the same spot (often the same pixel.) This immediately raises the alarm if it is done consistently. Most programs do not do this, though, but rather have an "area of uncertainty" where the click will randomly fall in. This is still easy to detect. There is accuracy, and precision. These programs do not replicate human precision. Consider the dartboard as an example: The goal is to simply "hit it." A human will still aim for the bullseye, to increase the chance of hitting the dartboard. Thus hits will be concentrated towards the bullseye, but there will still be hits nowhere close, and some misses too. A macro does not have human flaws, and can always hit the dartboard. However, if randomized in the "area of uncertainty" there is no such pattern." This will also raise the alarm. More advanced yet, some macros will actually form concentric regions of where the clicks will land. Still, we're always ahead of rulebreakers. Our final line of defense in this criteria is to analyze the regions most commonly clicked. A macro tends to click in a perfect square, circle, or sometimes the shape of an interface icon. Sometimes even the region is randomized. Human behavior is not truly random however. The region most commonly clicked is related to placement, which is all I know about this. Highly advanced bots have made an attempt to replicate even this, but we have not seen anything convincing yet. Admittedly, we're disadvantaged in this aspect, so we cannot fully rely on simple movement and accuracy to detect a macro program. The next criteria is the actual sequence of actions. A player that decides to cut some trees for logs, and sell them for profit actually has a longer list of actions to perform than you'd think. The efficiency of which this is completed can be analyzed, and much more easily compared to the behavior of a macro programs' attempt to replicate it. If each step is merely randomized with the same bounds of uncertainty like virtually all bots seem to do today, the actual time it takes to execute the actions in all converges to a specific value! It's similar to flipping a fair coin multiple times, and converging to a frequency of outcomes (namely 50%.) Humans are generally much less consistent, and once the consistency falls within a certain range, the alarm is raised. One more of many criteria is the effect of total gameplay time. As expected, exhaustion will set in for most players and slow down their actions. This is not a completely reliable method, since some players have been able to keep up their concentration for remarkably long periods of time." "The last criteria I really know of is probably the most obscure and advanced. Human players tend to have much better object recognition capabilities than a macro program, and the limitations of the procedure can be exploited. While a human may be able to recognize a tree at a very unusual and discrete angle, many macros lack this capability, and thus keep the camera angle within a certain range. Some fail to change it entirely. Macros tend to locate objects that are far out of reach by going close to the area in question, and then finding it. Normal players tend to look ahead first. There are probably many more techniques employed, and the genius and innovative capability of my coworkers is simply amazing. I am very confident in their ability to enforce the rules, and keep RS a fair, and equal environment. The detection system is definitely conducive to such, but that is not our only method. The next is abuse reports. There are many new and better bots, just written, that can avoid at a few of the criteria, and not be flagged. The intuition of a human being can never be surpassed, and abuse reports give us an all seeing eye that brought many rule breakers to justice. Abuse reports are also helpful for locating the archives, and comparing the new behavior of the new macro that was previously able to avoid detection. We can update accordingly. We highly encourage abuse reporting, and we will not punish players who send in reports with a reasonable cause to suspect the player in question is using a macro. Circumstances (such as the usual range of playing time) is taken into account as well.

Argh patched before I could try it

The past experiences I had with him aren't any less precious but its sad to know that he's account is no longer valid,I've always known him as someone who worked hard to get his stats, what happens beneath the surface is unknown I guess..

Omg sete's banned ?! I've known him for a long time, didn't think he would ever go against the rules especially him being a pmod, I wondered why he had his private off for almost 2 weeks :(

@Isthatok for a f35 large is it not worth it to do the bonus rooms?, also what rooms do you skip, I'm not pure ftp anymore so I don't know this, although I do dg on W61 occasionally. Thanks :D

In my opinion the reason jagex took away his dg ranks was to use him as an example to everyone, proving that they do punish rule breakers, but why they don't deal with other important issues like botting remains a mystery to me, well I guess bots make them money, take frost dragon bots. As an example, people buy membership just to bot, unfortunately for legit players. (of which there are very that can say they have never used a bot)

He would probably buy more membership to regain the xp he lost, money gain to jagex :)

Suomi I've got three 30 day gamecards (which I got for free Lolol), if u want a 10% boost, message me :P

saw dapledo mining concentrated gold ealier

Boredom persuaded me to right this :P Some stuff about Galaxyg ( I think some people might find interesting) : Galaxyg's real name is Penelope, yes she was a girl not a boy,she was one of the first 2000 accounts to be created. she never spoke to anyone or traded,which mean't she got all her supplies herself. she was around level 120 cb just before Rs2 was released, hence being one of the highest leveled players in classic. She actually attempted to create a forum back in 2002 but that didn't work out, -.- lol. i've got two pics of her in RSC but i can upload them on here so Gf me. :smile:

Hey guys, i just recently learned that mendark 9, was hacked and tbh it make me sad that a player who inspired others to be pure f2p is ruined, Anyway my advice to you guys is to make sure your account is well protected, I know more than a handful of people with somewhat "extraordinary" recovery skills, I know the hackers of chessy018, winallday, fir3g0d,Zach,Tks(number1 in RSC for a while)amongst TONS of rich/famous accountsThe reason why mendark was hacked was due to him being on the RSC highscores, Which made him an instant target (his hackers expected to get rares,but got a. Empty bank instead). The purpose of me writing this is to show that a anyone can be a victim of hackers. So protect your account and pixels guys :). ~Ex f2per IFFL/Rudes7

Sorry that this is off-topic but,I plan at camping cave crawlers to get from 90-9c rc,what would be a armour/weapon setup and inventory (including a cannon ofcourse). Btw goodluck suomi on your goal. :)

He is almost certainly either previously been p2p or a bot. I have no idea how someone could stay under the radar for as long as he has. At any rate, Rie---Xie--X is still probably just as close to maxing (also Mss Klercken). Hes just got 99 crafting yesterday, hes got dungeoneering to go then hes the first maxed lvl 3 skiller, would interesting to see how hes going to achieve that considering he has been under the radar for so long. :D