muggiwhplar

None of the above.

Full vid's done processing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTm9IGQVnwA

Doesnt sound like it's worth it :\ wish it gave like +15 range/magic att

What's a Tokkul-Zo? Is that the combat ring thing?

People wouldn't be bothered by this update if training skills the "normal" way was actually FUN.

Any chance you could create a separate thread to talk about effigies?

Some goals aren't all fun. Just like going to college/university. School isn't fun. Exams and homework aren't fun either, but it gets you one step closer to your goal of having a fulfilling life. Achieving those goals will not make you any happier. Real job > McDonalds Happiness is relative. And in my relative spectra, working at McDonalds is pure HELL. Youll probably end up in hell if you end up working a 9-5 like everybody else too, regardless of how much you earn. After you have enough money to pay for your basic needs, the extra money will not make you happier. It's just how your brain is wired.

Some goals aren't all fun. Just like going to college/university. School isn't fun. Exams and homework aren't fun either, but it gets you one step closer to your goal of having a fulfilling life. Achieving those goals will not make you any happier. Real job > McDonalds You dont need to go to college to get a well-paying or enjoyable career.

Some goals aren't all fun. Just like going to college/university. School isn't fun. Exams and homework aren't fun either, but it gets you one step closer to your goal of having a fulfilling life. Achieving those goals will not make you any happier.

Dont complain ti jagex about effigies. Complain about how boring and mindless rc/agility are.

If people aren't having fun when working towards their goal then they should change their goal.

The fact that this whole thread is [bleep]ing about effigies instead of discussing the TzHaar provides further evidence that most people don't have fun when playing RS because it's so boring and tedious.

Got my champion scroll within the first 2 hours there. Done with that now :D

Hell yeah. :lol: I'll reply more specifically to your posts and stuff tomorrow probably-- busy day today :\

Just think about men like Harrison Ford and George Clooney. They're old but I'm sure a lot of young women would drop their panties for them w/o hesitation :P

I thought you said you were done arguing with me yesterday :P Just out of interest; what do you expect when you're 60+? Also, what do you expect poly amorous women to do once they hit 60? For 60+ I haven't really thought that far ahead... I'm not too worried about it, I've got a lot of hope for the future. If you really want me to I can try to put together a day in the life of 60-year-old muggi lol. But I don't have time tonight :P I have thought a little about what women "should" do as far as polyamory and aging goes, though. Honestly, I feel bad for women. The older they get, the less attractive they become. They've got the odds against them when it comes to that kind of thing :( Without giving this too much thought, I'd say that by that age women should be doing more "motherly" things rather than sexual/romantic things. Basically I think the male and female "agendas" aren't very compatible.

Where did I say I'd be picking up girls when I'm 60? :huh: Regardless... RPG, I thought you understood that confidence is the most attractive trait in a man. So why would age matter? As far as the manhood thing goes, remind me and I'll post something later this week-- I don't have time for that one tonight, sorry. I thought you said you were done arguing with me yesterday :P

I think my odds of having sex with 24-year-olds when I'm 60 are a lot higher than having sex with my 60-year-old wife. The sex would probably be better too.

Men's sex drive stays more or less the same while women's sex drives decline as they age. It's much easier for an older man to be sexy than it is for an older woman.

Well of course the more time you spend with someone the more often you'll notice little things about them that annoy you. Depending on what the problem is, compromising isn't a loss of freedom. If anything a person should be happy to make some changes for the person they love because it lets them know they're being a better partner for it. But still, that compromise should never be one sided and the changes shouldn't have to be anything drastic. Compromising sex is usually what marks the beginning of the end. And considering as women get older, they become less physically attractive and their sex drive diminishes, that doesn't look too good for their partners.

Like I've said in the past-- I'm glad you feel that way, and I honestly hope you feel that way forever. I just don't believe that you will. Only time will tell.

If/when you move in with your boyfriend, you'll probably start to feel some of the negative changes I talk about. Same goes for sharing property. And getting married. And having kids. Those things entail compromise. Compromise entails loss of freedom.

I've been in love before and know exactly what you're talking about. My first relationship lasted for 3 years and it was awesome... and then things fell apart :P The same way your previous one did, I'd imagine. Monogamy isn't designed to facilitate the feelings you described above, and monogamy isn't necessary to experience what you described. EDIT: I'd also like to point out that the feelings you're describing are basically the honeymoon feelings.

I don't think it's possible to become bored with sex unless you're only having sex with the same person(s) every time. It's also hard to get lonely when I have so many loving friends and family members. More importantly, my favorite person to spend time with is... me. I enjoy solitude-- it's peaceful, relaxing, and full of freedom. I think many people enter relationships out of fear of being alone, and that's not good. Being with someone else, raising a child, drinking coffee with them in the morning, etc. sounds like fun and everything but I don't need to be in a monogamous relationship to experience that. Additionally, the negatives outweigh the positives that are included in that arrangement. Happiness at its full potential is a state I've only achieved twice in my life, and it was difficult to maintain for more than 24 hours-- that in itself is a whole 'nother topic. Regardless, other people had nothing to do with entering and maintaining that state. It all came from within. Think of it this way: Your happiness always has a certain "baseline." When you achieve a goal or eat food or exercise, you'll get a spike in dopamine to make you feel happy. But it's just a temporary happiness boost-- it doesn't last very long and before you know it, you're back to your baseline level of happiness. So basically people go through their lives, doing things to spike up their happiness as much as they can, but at the end of the day they really aren't any happier than they were to begin with. Negative things in your life do the opposite-- except the negativity affects you more severely and for longer periods of time. Your goal shouldn't be to experience as many positive spikes as you can-- it should be to boost the happiness baseline. Once your happiness baseline gets up to a certain level, your life will just be full of bliss and happiness, without any worries. You'll start to realize that you really don't need to have more money to be happy. You don't need to lose weight. You don't need a boyfriend/girlfriend. You already have everything. People get married because they think it'll make them feel happy, loved, complete, etc. But why get married if you can do all of those things on your own without marriage? Why sacrifice your freedom for something that you don't need?

I'm not sure if that's even possible... at least not until I'm like 60 years old lol. What do you think would cause such a thing to happen? I'd remain single, though probably. I value my freedom too much to go monogamous; there wouldn't really be any "need" for me to go monogamous either.