SoulWars
-
Posts
402 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by SoulWars
-
-
it is not tested and proven after 2 hits, for example
runescape = dice roll system = game of luck
repetition
+ measurement
you got a runescape calculator, maybe?
and you can say with confidence that i drew those conclusions after 2 hits?
no
it was an example of repetition
lol
-
do you know what assumption means?
it has multiple meanings
in this case, however, the meaning would be:
a fact which is assumed to be correct + which you're able to draw a conclusion from
e.g.
as said, "easily lost" = assumption (because of low alchemy value) = "impractical"
alors on danse
-
I can see that you're trying to argue semantics. FYI, you're doing it wrong.
there's no such thing as wrong unless there's a logical explanation to it
see what I just did there? :D
-
tested and proven: rapier gives higher slayer xp/h on every task except wyverns and waterfiends
tested and proven: you are hit less often by graardor's ranged attack while wearing high ranged defence armor than while wearing high magic defence armor.
edit: none of those things you quoted are assumption.
yes, they are
and
it is not tested and proven after 2 hits, for example
runescape = dice roll system = game of luck
repetition
+ measurement
you got a runescape calculator, maybe?
"1 BSS for forever = 3M you can always get back"
= assumption
"impractical for pvm cause theyre easily lost"
- for reasons stated previously
repeat 'none of those things u quoted are "assumption"' lol.
-
Again, what's your point? Bladewing presented proven, testable facts, and you decided to argue with him because . . . ?
proven = how is that proven? proof would be dps calculations blah blah
testable = tested* and no.
why? why not
It's been proven several times over. We've had three years to figure it out. :rolleyes:
I used the word 'testable' because it is testable. :rolleyes:
"Why not" -- Well, I dunno, maybe because he hasn't posted anything that can be challenged? :rolleyes:
Here's a few more of these:
:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
3 years is not evidence, but knowing our community, it's more LIKELY to be true
again, this is not about facts
it's not proven if it's testable
it is, however, proven if it is TESTED (and explained, but i wont go into that)
:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
^ ride of happiness
-
It's about you wanting to find somebody better than you to argue with, looks like.
We know for a fact that Graardor's attacks respond to ranged defense and NOT magic. You're the one who came in here ranting about assumptions when no assumptions had been made.
"ccbow won't make a significant difference against prime since cannon does most the work." assumption
"also rex i guess." assumption, especially when he didn't state what he was looking for e.g. cost-efficiency, price and damage
"spectral might be better than cks for bandos since his ranged attack's accuracy is based on your magic defense, not your ranged defense. citation: rswiki" assumption, but please ignore cuz that'll create another argument lol
"if you can't afford a BSS you shouldn't even consider using chaotic weaponry."
"1 BSS for forever = 3M you can always get back"
"negative mage def, better off with DFS/D defender."
"FKS/CKS are impractical for pvm cause theyre easily lost and have high degrade cost" easily lost? assuming u suck and have bad internet connection mhm
want me to continue with assumptions? please, sir, repeat, 'when no assumptions had been made'
-
Again, what's your point? Bladewing presented proven, testable facts, and you decided to argue with him because . . . ?
proven = how is that proven? proof would be dps calculations blah blah
testable = tested* and no.
why? why not
-
i never said that longsword was best for wyverns
thank you for showing me the error of my ways. from now on when i give advice, i will just tell people that "i can't help you because i wouldn't want to make any assumptions". for example i wouldn't want to assume that a person asking what the best gear to use is actually interested in what is the best gear. he may ACTUALLY be interested in what sword and shield combination looks the coolest.
nothing's an assumption if it has been proven
what's your point with the looks thingy? lol
for the record, looks = opinion
feel free to relate that to advice-giving, etc.
-
you need 80 attack to use any of the 3 melee chaotic weapons. if you have 80 attack, rapier is the best chaotic weapon on every task but wfs and wyverns.
the assumption was that people considering chaotic weapons can actually use chaotic weapons. i guess that's too much to assume.
btw, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwDfsBcojIQ
according to zarfot, the ultimate efficiency prod, maul>ls>rapier>whip for wyverns
conclusion:
assumptions and luck of evidence/testing
What in the world are you going on about? :huh: Bladewing is correct when he says that rapier > all other weapons on all slayer tasks with the exceptions of WFS and wyverns. He's also correct when he says that Graar's ranged attack is ranged based. What are you trying to argue? What's your point for arguing?
it's not about facts e.g. Graardor's attacks
it's about the factors determining conclusions and making assumptions
-
you need 80 attack to use any of the 3 melee chaotic weapons. if you have 80 attack, rapier is the best chaotic weapon on every task but wfs and wyverns.
the assumption was that people considering chaotic weapons can actually use chaotic weapons. i guess that's too much to assume.
btw, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwDfsBcojIQ
according to zarfot, the ultimate efficiency prod, maul>ls>rapier>whip for wyverns
conclusion:
assumptions and luck of evidence/testing
-
where is that assumption? and yeah you got me on the waterfiends, therefore everything i said has been made null.
you said that rapier is better on every task but wyverns (and wfs now).. but it could differ as twists were made to gear/stats/etc.
edit: let me give you an example. if u use rag gear and you had to choose between the rapier or maul, u'd rely more on the maul cuz u had bad gear, yeah? whereas with the rapier, u'd rely more on other things. mhm?
-
by saying, 'no need, we know it's ranged based.', you're assuming everybody (we) knows (obvious) that. tell that to those people who edited rswiki
where did i say that i thought you know that? where did i say it was obvious? - what?
by verifying it, people would stop arguing. therefore, 'no need' = invalid argument
there is no need for me to verify it because i have already done so. but for your sake i will do it.
i hereby verify that bandos uses a melee based melee attack and a ranged based ranged attack - ever heard of something being official or proven?
also rapier as been verified to be superior slayer xp/h on every task but wyverns. yet people still argue about it.
again, you're making an assumption. you're indirectly saying that every person has the same gear, stats, etc. also wfs? lol
-
I never said it was wrong, guys, I just said he shouldn't be talking about unreliable sources when he's making assumptions
where did i make an assumption?
also:
You sound like you've never been to Bandos.
Your stats tell me you've never seen the sun.
mad?
10-year-old troll? dat burger yum
by saying, 'no need, we know it's ranged based.', you're assuming everybody (we) knows (obvious) that. tell that to those people who edited rswiki
by verifying it, people would stop arguing. therefore, 'no need' = invalid argument
-
no need, we know it's ranged based.
no, you don't. it's a ranged attack, but you don't know what it's based on
if you call rsw an unreliable source of info, then you should take a look at yourself
Bandos has been out for more then 3 years....people have had time to test it.
Btw, I edited out the part about it being magic based, therefore, since Wiki is such a reliable source, it's a range based range attack :thumbup:
I never said it was wrong, guys, I just said he shouldn't be talking about unreliable sources when he's making assumptions
btw
fail sarcasm, edit that too :^o :^o :^o :^o :^o :^o
-
Super antifires last 6 minutes.
In those 6 minutes, you can get 60 lifepoints.
Once the boost wears off, equip the shield. Get hit like 50-30. Only get hit once, though, or you might die and I will laugh.
Once hit, quickly drink another sip to be immune to attacks et voilà.
-
...And what do I get from this? Pretty much no-one's going to use it if it doesn't give rewards.
Hybridding practice, for example.
People use the Duel Arena. They get no rewards, but it's fun.
-
why not just go with the good old broad-tipped bolts and rune crossbow? :)
-
Solo hybrid, solo mage or duo tribrid with a cannon.
Verac's skirt + Karil's top is fine for either
If maging, use claws of guthix or fire surge
If hybridding, use cannon/rapier (recharge it, god damnit :P)
Tribrid, idk, look at some guides
might wanna look into 2.5 cannoning
gl
-
For some door requirements, you may have to boost your stats using the various potions that can be made within Daemonheim. E.g., to boost agility, make and drink a survivalist's potion. There's a list of the potions you can make in the 'Dungeoneering'-section of the in-game herblore guide. Hope this answers your question.
-
no need, we know it's ranged based.
no, you don't. it's a ranged attack, but you don't know what it's based on
if you call rsw an unreliable source of info, then you should take a look at yourself
-
This is just a small, possible suggestion.
Wouldn't it be cool to have fist of Guthix mixed with the Duel Arena?
Let's look at the features, advantages and disadvantages of both.
Fist of Guthix:
*You cannot choose who you want to fight
*People hide because it's a competition (for tokens)
*You get free runes
*You get XP
Duel Arena:
*You don't get any runes
*You choose the rules
My suggestion - fighting arena:
*You get no XP
*You choose who you want to fight
*You get supplies (runes, food, potion, summoning - pre-made settings)
*You can choose your own spellbook
Basically, a fun way of fighting eachother. Like hybridding, but without risking. Just fun.
Feedback is, as always, appreciated :)
-
I would like to add that augury SUCKS. Leeches are better for magic, turmoil is better for melee, and soul split is invaluable. For any hybrid/tribrid, rigour isn't much use.
Also, it's such a hassle to change from curses to regular prayers and I don't range that much, anyway. Magic - like never. Except when I use vengeance in PvP, but that's another point, lol^^
-
No need, it's been tested to death.
I can't believe we're still having this conversation this many years after GWD was released. I could see it if the boss was a few weeks old, but we've known for a LONG time now that ranged defense is what matters at Bandos.
This.
RS-wiki isn't reliable.
Someone should've asked the question about general Graardor's secondary attack at RuneFest, lol. >_<
-
In my opinion, the shields are crap... and they cost to recharge (obviously). However, you should wait until they release the new soaking update.
Crossbow or staff - I really don't know where you'd use staff. There's only a 5% damage difference between SoL and CS. Furthermore, SoL saves runes, especially if wearing battle robes. If at dagannoth rex, for example, you wouldn't save runes, the recharging would cost and it'd be a higher risk. :thumbdown:
If you choose the crossbow, you could use it against dagannoth prime, at Armadyl, at tormented demons, etc. :thumbup:
:)
assist cc?
in Help and Advice
Posted
assistclan
or
assistchat
cant remember