NoHopeLeft

they're not mutually exclusive, I think you've misunderstood

Not really sure how this could possibly be relevant

"That effort you just put in for no return isn't good enough, go spend several more hours of your life on it" Way to be ungrateful

just lock this thread tbh

not sure you said 'insane gainz' enough times tbh

And also what is the point of that screenshot?

If you assume everyone has no bonus xp and will not gain it, you overestimate the time of players with bonus xp even more than otherwise. So actually assuming everyone has none and will get enough for 200m in each skill brings their time closer to their real time to max. Think about it.

Fair warning about Roger Al, he's only going to be at 100m-ish farming xp when he maxes every other skill. Edit: here are the xp rates I use in my calculator. I'm sure a lot of them are outdated so please leave feedback. Also it looks like I hacked together a solution for curly roots. It seems pretty accurate but it made everything a little messy. I'll have to make a newer, cleaner version at some point. skill xp rate daily xp rate daily xp attack 440000 0 0 defense 600000 0 0 strength 440000 0 0 ranged 400000 0 0 prayer 1100000 0 0 magic 600000 0 0 cooking 804000 0 0 woodcutting 170000 240000 40000 fletching 700000 0 0 fishing 140000 0 0 firemaking 350000 2418461.5 1310000 crafting 700000 0 0 mining 110000 1400000 363862.5 smithing 246000 1400000 363863.5 herblore 740000 1400000 363864.5 agility 200000000 0 0 thieving 300000 0 0 slayer 130000 0 0 farming 64000 1400000 363864.5 runecrafting 130000 0 0 hunter 350000 0 0 construction 850000 1400000 363864.5 summoning 5000000 0 0 dungeoneering 600000 2400000 200000 divination 95000 0 0 unless something changed since I did con in august last year, it's at least 880k xp/h without any bonuses not that it'll actually affect times much at all

So Forsberg finally hit a 3b year after being annoyingly close for ages

Shut up Jebrim

What's with Forsberg's sudden mining gains?

You don't have to be in the top 50 to be able to comment on who you think can get 200m all. If you didn't this thread wouldn't exist. This is a bad argument/zinger/whatever to make.

Are you Em?

Perhaps he just doesn't want to only have farming left to do so he's leaving some agility to actually train I dunno though

probably so you can once again make a post that is in no way about you or tmoa about you or tmoa maybe OT: Forsberg is now on a 2.8b year

It's kind of a slap in the face that this item that makes agility afkable was only obtainable for one weekend, given how overpowered its effect actually is like if I suddenly decided I want to go for 200m all skills, I'd have to play for 1000+ more hours because I didn't buy me some spins on one random weekend

is drumgun now closer to 200m all skills than suomi in terms of time? (this isn't just for gemeos to answer)

I use a fc, which is not 2400+. No 30min wait beforehand, just a gear check while looting. Very easy to get 75/75 mine/smith. But I heard that a certain fc crashes if they don't get 75/75 mining. Bonfires are less efficient than rocktails. Never do them. How can you commet on Bonfires when you don't do wbs? Not doing warbands is 3x as inefficent as bonfires. A bit hypocritical imo. Just an fyi for when you next decide to be dumb on the internet: Being a hypocrite (or perceived as one) doesn't make you wrong See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque Did I say that they were wrong? Learn to read, it's not that hard. Okay perhaps you didn't call him wrong, but you implied he can't or shouldn't comment on bonfires because of something else

Bonfires are less efficient than rocktails. Never do them. How can you commet on Bonfires when you don't do wbs? Not doing warbands is 3x as inefficent as bonfires. A bit hypocritical imo. Just an fyi for when you next decide to be dumb on the internet: Being a hypocrite (or perceived as one) doesn't make you wrong See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque

It appears legitimate, although the correct link is: http://www.thesistools.com/web/?id=383013 The one in the OP is copied directly from an email so it's a redirect that asks you to login

From GPLv2 The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it. Minified source code packed into a binary isn't the preferred form of DGSweeper source for making modifications. You're required under the license AHK is released under to release with DGSweeper both the un-minified code and whatever environment you use to build your binaries. An example from here says this: For a typical C program, this translates into all the source code (.c files) plus header files (.h files) plus the scripts used to control compilation and installation. Read that page for more info, you're violating the license.

I just downloaded DGSweeper and it is a standalone executable. Where's the source? It's not a requirement under GPLv2 to distribute the source with the executable but it must be available on request.

How did this happen? Don't you have backups and a git repo?

Translation: After a couple of pages of being told my secret xp rates are clearly wrong but being a stubborn ass, I finally realised I was wrong but instead of accepting it in a civil manner I decided to still be a dick about it

"Your mouse is bound to move at least 1 pixel during clicking, even if it's a touchpad button or mousekeys" - An actual JMod, 2013