Jump to content
Due to the significant updates that have taken place, you now need to login with your display name or e-mail address, NOT your login name. ×
Due to posts that are 5+ years old being rebuilt, some of the older BBCodes may not have converted properly but still be in the post. Most posts are unaffected but some using what was our custom BBCode (like [spoiler]) will be a bit broken. ×

GoldTatze

Members
  • Content Count

    165
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by GoldTatze

  1. Well he cant stake for money when he has nothing to stake, can he? :thumbup: His dignity must be worth...oh wait, never mind.
  2. This. The article i skimmed(first one) quoted a lot of scripture, and yet despite that who ever wrote it forgot the fact that it's written that no man nor angel knows the date of judgement day. Realistically it would be possible to make any day seem like judgement day with the math they used of adding and multiplying random numbers of significance together. It saddens me to see things like this, really :roll: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
  3. Or 2060 as Isaac Newton predicted. Honestly, I don't see why God (depending on your Religion I guess) would want to destroy the Earth. I mean...why? Either way, it won't be Oct 2011, and the Rapture most likely won't be May 21st just because some numbers add up. I trust the book of the Lord more than a random radio host.
  4. We've got a pretty good track record for surviving the unsurvivable, amirite? Booya.
  5. "Camping previously claimed that the world would end in September, 1994." This guy likes to guess. [EDIT] Ahh people seem to like to be right, this guy just found the one mathmatical equation to prove his theory. It just seems to me to be ridiculous that someone would sit around for years and try to find numbers to add up to what? another number. Weren't we supposed to die in 1999, 2000, 2002? Wasn't 9/11 the day of reckoning for all American people...alright then... :rolleyes:
  6. GoldTatze

    "L"

    (we'll pretend there is an L there)
  7. Except on slash weak monsters.
  8. Technically just a "fun" way to train instead of just using a Rune Scim...
  9. what's that sword next to your cr? Profound decorative sword. 800 Castle Wars tickets. :) what about those beige shorts?
  10. Well pures are douches because they think they can wreck everyone even though they are low leveled. It is a status symbol to some of them. I PvM and rarely PvP but I am not a douche, but Im not nice to people at TDS or in GWD if they try to crash me.
  11. First off, you were wrong because Zerker Ring = +6 Hit, not +18. Secondly, most people can afford Zerker, but ROW is better if they are looking to spend 2 minutes more finishing their task in hopes of making a quick 20M.
  12. Bet Jagex won't even do anything about it. The level 3 is probably just a mule anyway, so it won't matter. But the guy buying the gold is probably screwed. Ye he is screwed no doubt.
  13. Uber fail. The guy next to him in the in the helm of nezzy/orange clan cloak was literally talking to this guy about his gold purchase lol. At least 20 people reported both of them.
  14. This is alright. Don't get me wrong, it isn't bad, but Runewiki has up to date Calculators that show this exact formula in action for every item of every skill.
  15. Cool, thanks. I might give it a try after all this time.
  16. Is the EXP cut in half or whatever like PC is? Or is it if I kill a pyrefiend I get the same xp in the minigame as I would if I were to in the Fremmy Slayer Dung.
  17. No offense but wtf are you talking about? Tree Bug? lol. Anyways, it is because Choking Ivy is much faster in terms of Xp.
  18. wow 2 months...well i guess its still worth it haha :P

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.